Title: Australian lulz Post by: nugnugx on October 29, 2010, 09:22:48 am A 25-year-old Australian found himself the victim of the worst kind of prank -- one conducted by a tattoo artist with a particularly raunchy sense of humor.
Despite having requested some fairly harmless ink -- a yin-yang symbol and some dragons -- the man returned home to discover a 16-inch penis and an obscene, albeit misspelled, slogan "implying that he was gay" inscribed on his back, the Ipswich Queensland Times reports. "When he got home he showed it to the person he lives with and she said: 'I don't think it's the tattoo you were after,'" Queensland detective Paul Malcolm told the Times. And as if being permanently marked with a giant phallus on his back wasn't enough, the victim was also allegedly punched and thrown out of the studio by the 21-year-old amateur artist after the tattoo was completed, according to the AFP. Upon discovering the prank, the victim immediately contacted the police. The former friend who allegedly etched the tattoo is due in court Nov. 15, and has been charged with two counts of assault. He potentially faces additional public safety charges as he was not a licensed tattoo artist. On top of the inevitable ridicule, the victim reportedly faces a bill of between $600 to $2,000 to have the tattoo removed. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/27/australian-artist-charged_n_774608.html Title: Re: Australian lulz Post by: Smokaz on October 29, 2010, 12:54:41 pm Seems like a fairly stupid bit of news - no doubt the tatoo guy will have to answer for the cock tattoo it if its taken to court. This quoting of it makes it seem like it was just good fun with no consequence. In reality the tattoo guy probably have to pay for his medical bill - the removal of the tatto - and reimburse the cost of the original tattoo.
When you pay for a agreed item the guy agreeing to it is held responsible for your loss if he doesnt keep his part of the agreement. In this case this item was a tatoo which the buyer had certain expectations about it and the details of probably was discussed beforehand. Assault is a separate issue here, ending with fine/prison for the guy who did it. Title: Re: Australian lulz Post by: 3rdCondor on October 29, 2010, 02:28:17 pm win
Title: Re: Australian lulz Post by: Mysthalin on October 29, 2010, 02:33:17 pm In response to condor's signature :
Why wouldn't you fuck justin - especially for that money? She's a nice enough girl, albeit boobless. Title: Re: Australian lulz Post by: 3rdCondor on October 29, 2010, 02:33:45 pm In response to condor's signature : Why wouldn't you fuck justin - especially for that money? She's a nice enough girl, albeit boobless. ^^ I stand corrected Title: Re: Australian lulz Post by: tank130 on October 29, 2010, 03:07:49 pm I call bullshit!!
|