Title: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on February 04, 2011, 05:57:52 am With every next post in the balance forum the probability chance of unit being op or up rises by a few %.
When a thread reaches over 8+ pages you know that the unit is 100% op and needs ASAP attention for the next patch. Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: skaffa on February 04, 2011, 06:03:53 am With every next post in the balance forum the probability chance of unit being op or up rises by a few %. When a thread reaches over 8+ pages you know that the unit is 100% op and needs ASAP attention for the next patch. Haha, attention for next patch ye maybe, but a 8+ pages topic instantly labelling as 100% OP is pretty lol. Perhaps everyone posting was saying it was not OP. Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on February 04, 2011, 06:08:48 am Haha, attention for next patch ye maybe, but a 8+ pages topic instantly labelling as 100% OP is pretty lol. Perhaps everyone posting was saying it was not OP. even more proof it's OP , reverse psychology. Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: deadbolt on February 04, 2011, 06:22:37 am i could get a topic 8 pages long by saying no u
Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: Unkn0wn on February 04, 2011, 06:40:49 am With every next post in the balance forum the probability chance of unit being op or up rises by a few %. When a thread reaches over 8+ pages you know that the unit is 100% op and needs ASAP attention for the next patch. Is that why you created so many topics all of a sudden? Hoping that one of them is going to generate enough posts for us to consider it OP. Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on February 04, 2011, 06:53:00 am Is that why you created so many topics all of a sudden? Hoping that one of them is going to generate enough posts for us to consider it OP. Balance forum is for balance issues, so if there is a balance issue people post there AFAIK. Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: Unkn0wn on February 04, 2011, 06:53:46 am Fair enough, just odd that you created so many balance threads all of a sudden :p
Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on February 04, 2011, 07:00:05 am Fair enough, just odd that you created so many balance threads all of a sudden :p Those that i could remember Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: TheIcelandicManiac on February 04, 2011, 07:21:05 am Those that i could remember would it not have been smarter just make 1 tread and include all of the "op" units in just that tread?Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on February 04, 2011, 07:23:38 am would it not have been smarter just make 1 tread and include all of the "op" units in just that tread? no because it would be a cluster $!@!@@ everyone talking about something else Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: TheIcelandicManiac on February 04, 2011, 07:29:52 am no because it would be a cluster $!@!@@ everyone talking about something else but you would get 8 pages in a day. Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on February 04, 2011, 07:31:52 am but you would get 8 pages in a day. no worries , i already know which threads will have 8 pages in a few days Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: TheIcelandicManiac on February 04, 2011, 07:33:04 am no worries , i already know which threads will have 8 pages in a few days is that so? Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on February 04, 2011, 07:34:02 am yep
Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: TheIcelandicManiac on February 04, 2011, 07:36:23 am yep dont you think that it could get filled up with nothing but 1 guy asking the same question over and over again but a little diffrent and the other one would just say yes in many diffrent languages and ways and do the same thing over and over again? Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on February 04, 2011, 07:43:03 am dont you think that it could get filled up with nothing but 1 guy asking the same question over and over again but a little diffrent and the other one would just say yes in many diffrent languages and ways and do the same thing over and over again? no, because: a) It haven't been the case so far b) Threads that don't have broken units don't get any attention c) Having a long thread on EIR balance forum is an indication that there is an on-going flame war in the thread usualy with trash-talk from side A) which is protecting it's currently broken unit vs B) which want to fix the broken unit Luckily our balance team knows what they are doing and after some time digging through the pits of sorrow they get down to the nitty gritty core of the thread and after xxxxxx ammount of time (add a number of time which suits you) we get a fix. Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: TheIcelandicManiac on February 04, 2011, 07:46:27 am no, because: a) It haven't been the case so far b) Threads that don't have broken units don't get any attention c) Having a long thread on EIR balance forum is an indication that there is an on-going flame war in the thread usualy with trash-talk from side A) which is protecting it's currently broken unit vs B) which want to fix the broken unit Luckily our balance team knows what they are doing and after some time digging through the pits of sorrow they get down to the nitty gritty core of the thread and after xxxxxx ammount of time (add a number of time which suits you) we get a fix. fair enough , you win this time but next time i will be prepaired Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: Spartan_Marine88 on February 04, 2011, 09:29:03 am the 8 plus pages thing would be a great idea if people werent human. The mere fact that once people start arguing about something, they won't stop no matter whether they are right or wrong.
Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: Falcon333 on February 04, 2011, 09:39:16 am the 8 plus pages thing would be a great idea if people werent human. The mere fact that once people start arguing about something, they won't stop no matter whether they are right or wrong. I disagree. People can be persuaded if proven wrong (and the accept it). Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: nugnugx on April 26, 2011, 12:43:02 pm 9 pages in 1 day
http://forums.europeinruins.com/index.php?topic=18896.0 8) My correlation works exactly as i said and also this applies 100% Quote b) Threads that don't have broken units don't get any attention c) Having a long thread on EIR balance forum is an indication that there is an on-going flame war in the thread usualy with trash-talk from side A) which is protecting it's currently broken unit vs B) which want to fix the broken unit Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: Mister Schmidt on April 26, 2011, 12:45:35 pm 9 pages of Nug fail - Check.
Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: AmPM on April 26, 2011, 12:47:04 pm I already told you Nug, we can change tank repair if you fix the broken infantry retreat at the same time.
Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: NightRain on April 26, 2011, 01:39:59 pm Don't fix something that is not broken plz
Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: smurfORnot on April 26, 2011, 02:20:09 pm Don't fix something that is not broken plz Nug disagrees with you 8) Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: RoyalHants on April 26, 2011, 02:20:18 pm I already told you Nug, we can change tank repair if you fix the broken infantry retreat at the same time. +1Title: Re: EIR correlation Post by: Unkn0wn on April 26, 2011, 03:39:05 pm No need for necromancy.
And we already have a thread about repairs, don't need to start another discussion about that here. |