|
Title: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Katusha on July 21, 2011, 06:10:18 pm go fuck yourselves
sincerely, katusha Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Killer344 on July 21, 2011, 06:16:39 pm u mad bro?
Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Unkn0wn on July 21, 2011, 06:17:41 pm This isn't the balance forum.
Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Katusha on July 21, 2011, 06:18:16 pm Why is there even a balance forum?
Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Unkn0wn on July 21, 2011, 06:20:18 pm So people like yourself could rage post in it after losing a game, obviously.
Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: DarkSoldierX on July 21, 2011, 06:22:35 pm Dude, u bring this wimpy thing
(http://www.thewvsr.com/spamsingles.jpg) And we bring this (http://www.efrem.info/immagini/spam.jpg) guess which 1 winz u nub? Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Killer344 on July 21, 2011, 06:23:04 pm So people like yourself could rage post in it after losing a game, obviously. Not if they get banned from the Balance Forum for rage posting lolz. Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Unkn0wn on July 21, 2011, 06:25:42 pm Not if they get banned from the Balance Forum for rage posting lolz. Shhh Also, everything is better with bacon Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Katusha on July 21, 2011, 06:28:09 pm So people like yourself could rage post in it after losing a game, obviously. Maybe that's why I DIDN'T post it in the balance forum I think the non-doctrine buffed 95 is fine really, only the dual T3s may be a little too much. Great sense of balance, really it is In my opinion, as meaningless as mostly everybody else's here, 95 MM cromwells need to go up to AT LEAST 220 fuel. Everyone is really undervaluing it having a turret. Second, Staghounds to at least 100 fuel. Why am I even posting this, all I'm gonna get is "no it feels good where it is," "its not so much of a problem because they are really easy to counter with tanks," and the best one "hey you started with a rage post, so why should we listen to you?" Title: Re: Whoever made 95mm cromwells 180 FU, and staghounds 80 FU Post by: Unkn0wn on July 21, 2011, 06:33:08 pm Honestly, as someone who has been using them extensively (without dual T3s) long before they became the FOTM I can assure you the base unit is adequately priced at around 180 F. The real and only issue lies in the dual T3 combo (+25% AoE and +20% Damage). Go make a non-doctrine buffed 95mm spam company, then come tell me it's OP.
You lost a game, I get it, it sucks to lose games, even more so when it's against some stupid gimmick. But making these kind of threads about it doesn't give you any real credence. You want to discuss the 95mm? Go discuss it in the balance forum, the proper way. |