|
Title: Defensive equipment Post by: Smokaz on April 11, 2012, 02:03:20 am can we add so that you can buy the lmgs on your normal ab riflemen as well? it would be nice
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: aeroblade56 on April 11, 2012, 08:15:28 am Wait thats like a T4 unlock?? AB with garands. No but LMGS i dont see them working very well they seem to have a short burst and seem weak compared to any other LMGS it has a longer range?!? we should have Hicks come over.
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: Groundfire on April 11, 2012, 08:17:43 am Airborne's a fuckin mess..
what would be the point of that? BARs are statistically quite better than that LMG. Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: aeroblade56 on April 11, 2012, 08:26:15 am So, any news on how that new AB doctrine that was soupposed to be worked on. whats the ETA???. we haz no toyz.
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: Smokaz on April 11, 2012, 08:40:55 am I thought the allied lmg was better vs soldier armor and heroic armor than the bar, is this wrong?
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: aeroblade56 on April 11, 2012, 08:47:43 am idk seems pretty useless to me
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: Groundfire on April 11, 2012, 08:47:55 am That is true, with 2 reservations:
1. There are no axis units left in the game that have soldier armor 2. Heroic armor is great vs. everything but flames and nades, the difference is very small and only 2 axis units have this armor. KCH and the Wehr officer. The advanatages are pretty much not there to warrant the LMG over the BAR. Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: AmPM on April 11, 2012, 08:52:04 am That is true, with 2 reservations: 1. There are no axis units left in the game that have soldier armor 2. Heroic armor is great vs. everything but flames and nades, the difference is very small and only 2 axis units have this armor. KCH and the Wehr officer. The advanatages are pretty much not there to warrant the LMG over the BAR. On to of that, the lmg eliminates your airborne armor advantage while in use. Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: aeroblade56 on April 11, 2012, 08:59:38 am So, i got a Question here. Idk how long the LMG has been in Airborne doctrine but Why was it bought in to begin with, i mean surely not every said lets implement a immobile weapon on a mobile armor system and platform?. I dont know just seems odd.
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: deadbolt on April 11, 2012, 09:00:44 am Tankedit: Enjoy your vacation
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: 3rdCondor on April 11, 2012, 09:02:25 am give airborne grease guns
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: aeroblade56 on April 11, 2012, 09:04:29 am tankedit:
Fixed. Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: Groundfire on April 11, 2012, 09:06:28 am So, i got a Question here. Idk how long the LMG has been in Airborne doctrine but Why was it bought in to begin with, i mean surely not every said lets implement a immobile weapon on a mobile armor system and platform?. I dont know just seems odd. Firesparks... It was a change made when only one person was capable of working and updating the mod. No separation of powers = someone can do whatever the hell he wants and we get changes like this. :P Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: aeroblade56 on April 11, 2012, 09:14:01 am Hmm, and it hasnt been modified since then to change the stats on it? or something since then?, hasnt the Airborne doctrine been worked on forever now.
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: Smokaz on April 11, 2012, 09:15:07 am God forbid firesparks was here to make a patch
Title: Re: Defensive equipment Post by: Groundfire on April 11, 2012, 09:20:10 am Hmm, and it hasnt been modified since then to change the stats on it? or something since then?, hasnt the Airborne doctrine been worked on forever now. If you had any comprehension of the magnitude of work it takes to get a doctrine draft agreed upon by all 3 development teams and coded then implemented, I think you would have alittle more sympathy. Current AB drafts do not have the LMG in them. God forbid firesparks was here to make a patch Just cause firesparks has the scripts and the shiney button to "make a patch" did not give him the authority to be Designer, coder and balance team all at the same time. Anyone on the dev team can make a patch now, I can almost make a patch, its not the button that's the issue. Anywho, enough of that, its water under the bridge. |