*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 14, 2024, 06:38:41 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]

[December 14, 2022, 12:10:06 am]

[September 22, 2022, 06:57:30 am]

[August 22, 2022, 05:10:35 pm]

[May 26, 2022, 10:13:22 am]
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [US] Anyone know a good Airborne company build??  (Read 11283 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #40 on: October 12, 2010, 07:59:12 am »

EIRR-historically, a good AB company had mass AB with AB divided into subroles of 1) satchels on stuff in the back 2) RRs 3) grenade airborne to just break up the defence of axis before it became dug in, and it was usually supported by 75mm shermans, quads and Crocs for AI duty.

This stemmed from the more frequent axis defend scenarios this mod used to have back in old EIR and the old repair system where axis would have repair bunkers. And doctrine abilities which made base airborne cheap, behind the line drops effective (raid) and so on.

In modern EIRR the ability to drop in to satchel a repairing tank which is immobile is strangely unpopular, forcing repairing tanks off the field used to be a sign of good play.

Other iterations of good AB play is the RR and flamer company, centered around the use of the 60mm mortar to take advantage of mortar smoke cover which the RR functions under while negating a lot of good counters to them. It was very popular some patches ago in a mortar-smoke metagame.

Airborne Rifle's centric companies seem the weakest concept to me, because they are very poor against PE and take up precious infantry pool and while the bar isn't a bad weapon objectively, it's not super good either. Hit'n run which is the AB armor type strength isn't particulary meaningful with the BAR.

The way I see it there's two main routes to go; tanks for AI/AT and a airborne type doing the other role, or a mix of both AI and AT tanks and both AB rifles and RRs.

If you want a good balanced Airborne company able to fight and win under most circumstances, it should probably contain:

2 x 60mm's --> mortar smoke
RR's -> anti tank, mortarsmoke weapon
Flamers  -> anti inf, building -> mortar smoke
Crocs with bulldozer -> anti tank traps, mortar smoke
Satchel Airborne -> anti 88, anti good defenses, mortar smoke, anti-repairing tanks
Shermans - AI duty from range
Hellcats*
Airborne medic**

*Or similar vehicle good at dealing damage to pumas and AC's
**With all your high health, high number, high cost squads recycling their health is important

Doctrine choices that reduce droptime/reinforce time are good for this type of build, as it allows flexibility in when and where you drop and how much you drop.



« Last Edit: October 12, 2010, 08:08:31 am by Smokaz » Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
rifle87654 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1107


« Reply #41 on: October 15, 2010, 08:08:38 pm »

So AB is more effective than ABR?
Then what to do about my vet ABRs?
« Last Edit: October 16, 2010, 12:20:26 am by rifle87654 » Logged

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha hahahahah
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha hahahahah
Does he have a problem?
Anyway he's hilarious.
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.063 seconds with 36 queries.