*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 19, 2024, 04:57:10 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]

[December 14, 2022, 12:10:06 am]

[September 22, 2022, 06:57:30 am]

[August 22, 2022, 05:10:35 pm]

[May 26, 2022, 10:13:22 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Standardizing naming conventions  (Read 5757 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Kolath Offline
Commander, 2nd Infantry Division
*
Posts: 2382



« on: August 10, 2007, 10:34:55 am »

This is mainly directed at Unkn0wn and the rest of the mapping team.  It think it might be a good idea to  publish some standards for how we want threads and files named.  Standardized conventions would make it easier to find things and keep track of things.  So here are my proposals...

Thread Naming Convention: [Prefix] #p Mapname (e.g. "[Beta] 8p French Countryside")

Prefix denotes what the thread is about and would be...

[WIP] - For any stage of a map before beta from initial idea to almost done.
[Beta] - Maps in beta release, used for discussion of gameplay, replays, etc.
[Final] - Announces definitive release of a map.  Used for praise, suggestions, bugs, etc.

Other topics would obviously have regular names, but having a standard for map threads would make it really easy to know what a thread is about just from the title.  As maps move through the process, I think they should make a new thread (or at least remember to rename).  Also, the first post should always contain the most up-to-date version of any map.

File Naming Convenion: #p_Map_Name_version (e.g. "4p_Crossroads_b2")

The first part is based off the relic convention.  The version suffix is debatable.  I think it is good so it is obvious whether you have the latest version or not, but I can also see arguments against it.  But there should definitely be at least a "beta" suffix for beta maps to distinguish them from finished approved maps.  Also, authors should be sure to update their scenario description with a version number every time they release a new version.

So, what do you guys think?
Logged

Kolath's Quote Commandments:
1. Thou shalt not quote the entirety of a post 3 or less posts above you
2. Thou shalt not quote more than 2 nested levels
3. Thou shalt not quote large blocks of text when one sentence would do
4. Thou shalt not quote images!
fldash Offline
Founder
*
Posts: 9755


« Reply #1 on: August 10, 2007, 10:39:01 am »

Agree...
Logged
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18377


« Reply #2 on: August 10, 2007, 10:40:48 am »

Same system as Relic News and it works there... I was hoping people would already do it themselves Tongue.
I'll be sure to enforce this.
Logged
Days of War Offline
Official Axis Propoganda Minister
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1164


« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2007, 10:42:29 am »

Hows about a TS format to? Enforce the

Axis | Name or Axis_Name or something.
Logged

Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18377


« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2007, 10:45:51 am »

What?
Logged
Kolath Offline
Commander, 2nd Infantry Division
*
Posts: 2382



« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2007, 10:58:37 am »

That would be good.  I like "Axis | Name" or "Axis/Allies | Name" for people with both teams.  We could put that in the TS welcome message.  Since we now use the slick new battle system, we only need one of the team names rather than both.
Logged
Kolath Offline
Commander, 2nd Infantry Division
*
Posts: 2382



« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2007, 12:59:01 pm »

I recommend adding the thread and file naming conventions to one of the stickies.
Logged
GsT Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 12


« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2007, 02:38:26 am »

Nice idea for the map Kolath!
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #8 on: August 11, 2007, 01:07:17 pm »

I refuse your conventions.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Kolath Offline
Commander, 2nd Infantry Division
*
Posts: 2382



« Reply #9 on: August 11, 2007, 02:53:23 pm »

I refuse your conventions.

Lol!
Logged
Kolath Offline
Commander, 2nd Infantry Division
*
Posts: 2382



« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2007, 02:16:56 pm »

Unkn0wn, can you add something like this to the posting guidelines?

"Authors should post their map dimensions (both playable and OOB) in the first post."
Logged
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18377


« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2007, 02:28:01 pm »

Why's that so important?
Logged
Kolath Offline
Commander, 2nd Infantry Division
*
Posts: 2382



« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2007, 06:28:38 pm »

Well It's not essential, but is useful to get a sense of size and for other mappers to compare sizes without having to extract the .sga and look at the info file. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.063 seconds with 35 queries.