*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 05:19:36 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[Today at 01:28:23 pm]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]

[December 14, 2022, 12:10:06 am]

[September 22, 2022, 06:57:30 am]

[August 22, 2022, 05:10:35 pm]

[May 26, 2022, 10:13:22 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Reasons why rangerspam is OP (not me :P)  (Read 3557 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ranger_Spam Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 40


« on: January 20, 2008, 04:04:41 pm »

Well i played a game tordajo+brad anderson+tharulerme vs aldog+pink tiger+me
Basicly 3 inf player we got owned and we couldn't do anything abut it. battle 1902 replay should be here soon
Logged
CaperPuts Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 42


« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2008, 04:13:36 pm »

Yeah, here's the replay. Somethnig has to be done. Infantry-Lol smgs, emplacements-lol fireup nades tanks- lol bazookas.

[attachment deleted by admin]
Logged

CommanderNewbie Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1240


« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2008, 04:46:39 pm »

There were a number of mistakes committed in the battle, but I won't dispute that 3 ranger companies (looked like at least 2 of them had tier 4s) is difficult to deal with.

What I really want to know is how much they had besides that.
Logged

CommanderNewbie - Allied
Prydefalcn - Axis
BradAnderson Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1233



« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2008, 05:03:10 pm »

hi, obv i took part in that battle and no only 1 of us had a tier 4 tharuleme.. also i did have quite alot obv because i put most of my RBs into manpower and munitions  but none fuel therefore i have the ability 2 buy rangers as a replacement for riflemen which suck against everything also i had 4 shermans 18 rangers 3hmgs 2 engineers and 6 rifles in my company i like it that way as i know if i loose units... all i'm saying is if u nerf rangers or completly phase them out i guarentee nobody well except a few will still play allied as aliied tanks r paper thina nd can barely beat a puma also rifles cant beat volks let alone grens no matter what vet yes i know allied have pershings but how exspensive r they hmmmmmm? exactly a lot so nerfing rangers wont solve anything except from making a few whining axis happy for about 10mins until they find something else 2 moan about like mayb airbourne or any other decent unit in allies all i mean is allies run on elite units so by phasing them out would b big mistake.
Logged
RangerSpam Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 80


« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2008, 05:14:32 pm »

hi, obv i took part in that battle and no only 1 of us had a tier 4 tharuleme.. also i did have quite alot obv because i put most of my RBs into manpower and munitions  but none fuel therefore i have the ability 2 buy rangers as a replacement for riflemen which suck against everything also i had 4 shermans 18 rangers 3hmgs 2 engineers and 6 rifles in my company i like it that way as i know if i loose units... all i'm saying is if u nerf rangers or completly phase them out i guarentee nobody well except a few will still play allied as aliied tanks r paper thina nd can barely beat a puma also rifles cant beat volks let alone grens no matter what vet yes i know allied have pershings but how exspensive r they hmmmmmm? exactly a lot so nerfing rangers wont solve anything except from making a few whining axis happy for about 10mins until they find something else 2 moan about like mayb airbourne or any other decent unit in allies all i mean is allies run on elite units so by phasing them out would b big mistake.
airborne arent that gd considering they dont have smgs
Logged
CommanderNewbie Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1240


« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2008, 05:25:15 pm »

my god, punctuation is your friend.  I can't even process that.
Logged
|-|Cozmo|-| Offline
Lieutenant General of all Ninja's.
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4950


« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2008, 06:29:43 pm »

something about if you make rangers any weaker then they are (lolz?) then nobody will play as allies...

well thats complete Bullshit, rangers are not ment to be the main stay of an army, they are the elite.
and riflemen can be effective. if they have BAR's and stickies they can beat back most things.

And allied armour is not THAT bad, yes shermans loose to a PIV head to head, but that is not what tank battles are ment to be about, the allies have sticky bombs use them THEN throw the sherman in(duh).

Even with the fire up *nerf* its still HMG: lolz, fire up, nade or Axis inf: lolz, Vet 3 smg's or axis armour: lolz, fireup, zook to the ass.
Logged
acker Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053


« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2008, 09:23:35 pm »

If you can't kite the Rifles...*sigh*. And, of course, the name "RangerSpam" really isn't biased at all.

See the thread that's three below this one.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2008, 09:24:59 pm »

Rangers are great, when used to enhance other infantry and your vehicles. They are not great as the only infantry unit in your army.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
acker Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2053


« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2008, 09:32:37 pm »

Also, for some reason or other, this replay doesn't work. Can someone verify this?
Logged
fldash Offline
Founder
*
Posts: 9755


« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2008, 09:33:34 pm »

I might have made a new release since this...
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 36 queries.