3rdCondor
Donator
 Posts: 1536
|
|
« on: October 21, 2010, 11:28:20 am » |
|
I represent the "Pool Cost is Too Damn High" Party.
-EIR players can't afford to build their desired companies because of pool cost
-Allies can't buy at guns, snipers, and calliopes without risking pp loss
-LISTEN! Someone's sherman is getting blown up CAN YOU HEAR IT? You gotta listen like me. Sherman ain't got no support cuz the pool cost is too damn high.
-My job is to put PPs the on the table and desired companies in the launcher
-Let's talk about issue!
-Pool cost is too damn high
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2010, 11:35:59 am » |
|
You got my vote sir!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
 Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2010, 11:53:49 am » |
|
Haha, bravo +1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Killer344
The Inquisitor
 Posts: 6904
|
|
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2010, 11:54:43 am » |
|
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
|
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2010, 01:33:26 pm » |
|
WIN
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
Illegal_Carrot
Global Moderator
Posts: 1068
|
|
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2010, 08:20:48 pm » |
|
Revert to the old In Supply/In Reserve system.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Rifle87654: Give me reward points.
Brn4meplz: I'm drunk. |
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
 Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2010, 08:21:45 pm » |
|
This is a good post. Does the Calliope pull from Support?
Shit so it does...
well Given it's Fuel cost it's rare you'll hit he Armour pool limit. I can change that.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 21, 2010, 08:23:22 pm by brn4meplz »
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom  |
|
|
salan
Synergies TL2 mod!
Posts: 6290
|
|
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2010, 08:42:44 pm » |
|
Uh its a support vehicle... why shouldn't it be support, or do priests/hummels cost vehicle pool ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2010, 09:18:43 pm » |
|
All Artillery that I know of is Support.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2010, 09:42:25 pm » |
|
It's also a Tank, and More of a Tank with NGV then a Support option.
The fact that it eats all your Fuel but doesn;t pull from Armour doesn't seem odd to you?
Hummel and Priest can pull from those aswell if it benefits the Doctrine.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| rifle87654
|
|
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2010, 04:20:57 am » |
|
There shouldn't be pool. Spam as a way of life. +1 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha hahahahah
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha hahahahah
Does he have a problem? Anyway he's hilarious. |
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18377
|
|
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2010, 04:24:49 am » |
|
Rifle, stop trolling the balance forum or I'm going to remove your access.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2010, 04:37:40 am » |
|
I agree with the rest. The calliope, even with NGV - is still relied on as artilery more than it is relied upon as a tank.
It should remain within it's support pool.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2010, 09:10:03 am » |
|
I agree with the rest. The calliope, even with NGV - is still relied on as artilery more than it is relied upon as a tank.
No, it really shouldn't as it makes it too difficult to get at guns. And its a Sherman, which is armor, so armor pool it should be. *note, only ones disagreeing atm are heavily axis biased |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 22, 2010, 09:23:13 am by Spartan_Marine88 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2010, 09:24:57 am » |
|
No, it really shouldn't as it makes it too difficult to get at guns.
And its a Sherman, which is armor, so armor pool it should be.
*note, only ones disagreeing atm are heavily axis biased
Consider it as a trade off RCA Companies that have a lot of arty has no tanks. Trade off |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #15 on: October 22, 2010, 09:27:05 am » |
|
Consider it as a trade off
RCA Companies that have a lot of arty has no tanks. Trade off
I would, but the fact is, that with it being in the Support pool, it destroys your capabilities for support weapons, and as the fuel is so HIGH it destroys your armor capabilities also |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2010, 09:29:43 am » |
|
so the solution is make armor pool cost high too? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2010, 09:32:44 am » |
|
It is still a trade off mate. You get the best artillery piece in game that becomes an actual tank with a tier 3 unlock. Its fast arty piece, its STRONG too due to its armor and gets smoke all what the other arty pieces lack of. Its cost is high for a reason if it was any lower people would more or less have 2 of them in their coy and few tanks ontop of that. Now if you take 2 of those you'll end up with nothing to defend 'em. Same thing with Any other doctorine. Example: PE with 2 hummels, they got very little for everything else fuelwise. RCA is whatsoever as they get the button and PIATs that work together like a dream so they don't need ATGs in that matter. PE with no vehicle stopping cabilities (other than LATHT which is only engine damage, temporary or perma)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2010, 09:37:07 am » |
|
PE gets 50 mm Hts which destroy any Allied armor
LATHT is more of a sniper, then a at weapon another thing that your can't buy with a cally
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2010, 09:47:01 am » |
|
PE gets 50 mm Hts which destroy any Allied armor
LATHT is more of a sniper, then a at weapon another thing that your can't buy with a cally
It is nothing but a mobile PAK38 everyone knows this yet people still tend to disagree with it and say its awfully better. It indeed has its advantage which is no deployment time and rapid movement to enable it to scoot and shoot. However this pak indeed eats a lot of support pool, if you got 2 hummels I must say to you you ain't got anything left to buy these things. Not many at least say 2 of them at max and maybe that is too much as well. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
