*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 16, 2024, 04:51:26 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]

[December 14, 2022, 12:10:06 am]

[September 22, 2022, 06:57:30 am]

[August 22, 2022, 05:10:35 pm]

[May 26, 2022, 10:13:22 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 17 pounder under snip  (Read 3325 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
rai0 Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 42


« on: February 17, 2009, 03:09:04 am »

" - AT guns are 50% less accurate against other AT guns. This will stop cloaked 'Pak sniping' of 57mms. "

  17pounder also affected ?
 will be harder to snip em? Its funny, just bout 3-4 snipin shots, and 17p down   Roll Eyes

 r
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2009, 03:50:59 am »

hmm, good question, depends on what class the 17 pdr is. If it's in the bunker class, then its not effected cuz it's not a "towed gun"

ok, just checked, 17pdr and other emplacements are considered "check points" and paks get 300% acc, and 50% dmg vs them. also 300% penetration
« Last Edit: February 17, 2009, 03:53:51 am by Tymathee » Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
rai0 Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 42


« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2009, 04:06:03 am »

lolek

paks, PE fire morts, morts..    emplacements becomin littl bit uselles. 
r
Logged
Two Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2079


« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2009, 04:09:49 am »

a little bit more useless
Logged




Quote
IplayForKeeps: if we were an equation
IplayForKeeps: it would be
IplayForKeeps: two = keeps
IplayForKeeps: i only have 1 friend
rai0 Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 42


« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2009, 04:11:38 am »

more then more
Logged
puddin Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1701



« Reply #5 on: February 17, 2009, 07:08:14 pm »

Guys... Emplacments have never been and will never be the backjbone of the army for the brits.  They are always very very easily killed even 9in VCOH.  Give me 3 stukas, and emplacements die. 

The 25pounder is increably effective.  And the 17pounder can be a huge advantage.  Pop 1 down and the firing arce is massive compaired to other AT guns plus the dmg. 

Look, they are ment to be used to support ur troops not to have tons of.
Logged

Puddin' spamtm
i cant really blame smokaz i mean playing against puddin is like trying to fight off breast cancer. You might win and do it and be a bad ass but you'll feel sick and mutilated forever.

Puddin' spamtm is soulcrushing... what's hard to understand about that?
MistenTHA Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 122


« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2009, 07:13:20 pm »

If you can use emplacements in EiR:R effectively Puddin, kindly share a replay and some tips with the rest of us. Most people haven't been able to get them to work well.

They are easier to kill here, and lack of quick response mobility makes them die easily to indirect fire and flanking.

In vCoH you can park them on an important sector, denying resources to your enemy while buffing your own. This in turn grants Brits a technology advantage, with better units taking on lower tech units. These 2 bonuses is not present in EiR:R.

For their resource and pop cost at the moment, a .30 cal and a 57mm ATG will beat out the MG nest and 17 pounder in utility and flexibility.
Logged
Khorney Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 221



« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2009, 07:19:36 pm »

i never have more than 4 emplacements in my army, a 17 (+backup one) a bofors, and a vickers (which hardly counts). you should never have more than 2 on at once, but they have thankfully low popcap for their potential. you should always have your max of 2 fireflys for your main anti-tank. they just get mortared into oblivion by any competent player.

that said, the new setup time has made them infinitely more useful, and able to setup in much more controlling arcs, whereas before they would be rushed mid setup by the tank they were supposed to be taking down, or placed too far back to be effective.

the paks are annoying, but most axis players have a tendancy to steer well away, as it can normally take out a PAK if it is revealed. shrecks are much more troublesome to your 17 pndr's
Logged
puddin Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1701



« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2009, 08:55:46 pm »

use emplacments well?  Sure.  heres what u do.  Build 1 at a time, cover your flank with a bofrs and attack up a road, when they truy to flank around and suprise you, boom they die. 

look.  *Use emplacements in 1 maybe 2 at a time and suddenly they work veyr very well.

use 3-4 at a time and u will lose unless your an expert
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 35 queries.