wildsolus
Donator
 Posts: 807
|
|
« on: July 02, 2009, 12:21:25 pm » |
|
Could we please get a hold fire option for the 57 at gun? It's available on the mortar and would love to see it on the AT gun.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DuckOfDoom
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2009, 12:52:51 pm » |
|
This has been around ever since people were accusing paks of being OP, so yes, about time this got implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wildsolus
Donator
Posts: 807
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2009, 01:36:29 pm » |
|
Reason why I want this implemented is because so many axis players throw their volks way in front of their tanks so that the basic infantry gets shot at first instead of the tanks...which doesn't work for the americans at all.
It's just aggravating that the at guns shoot at the infantry because there is no way to stop them from firing (besides constantly moving them).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| velocity78
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2009, 01:54:33 pm » |
|
Reason why I want this implemented is because so many axis players throw their volks way in front of their tanks so that the basic infantry gets shot at first instead of the tanks...which doesn't work for the americans at all.
It's just aggravating that the at guns shoot at the infantry because there is no way to stop them from firing (besides constantly moving them).
+1 make it for brits also |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
3rdCondor- just hand out reward points and ppl will shut up tank130-How about people shut up and we hand out reward points... just a thought Velocity, why you no let us do public lynching?  Smurf has a serious fucking problem.. |
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
 Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 02, 2009, 02:48:59 pm » |
|
brits don't need it - they got fall cloak for their ATGs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2009, 04:49:49 pm » |
|
well you can still have the hold fire for the brit at gun and even the wehr at gun if it's uncloaked. Brit atg auto holds fire again infantry targets when cloaked, which is nice
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
Osprey
Maj. Osprey, Royal Lincolnshire Regiment
Posts: 375
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2009, 05:12:28 pm » |
|
To be honest, this is something that should be on all AT guns, it makes sense you would have the crew hold their fire until vehicles or armoured targets enter line of fire, mainly to conserve ammo against important targets, let alone prevent infantry/volks revealing the AT gun in the fog of war by it firing at them, to then be counter shot by an enemy AT gun or Marder.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Aggamemnon
Donator
Posts: 418
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2009, 05:50:55 pm » |
|
Isn't there any way to simply not have ATG's fire at anything but tanks/apc's unless specifically ordered too?
Either way, do one or the other please.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Success on D-Day, depended entirely on these men"
|
|
|
| spinn72
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2009, 07:54:01 pm » |
|
Ok if the Brit ATG is fully cloaked (all 3 men + gun), then the Hold Fire option will be there, and it will not Target Infantry while cloaked unless it gets revealed.
I think this is a fantastic logic.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2009, 03:36:03 am » |
|
The brit atg just needs it's gun clokaed to "be cloaked" and for it to not shoot at infantry(except the rifle guy, who doesn't uncloak the gun when firing).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
