*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 16, 2024, 04:50:38 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: British Grit  (Read 3972 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
HansVonLuk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 220


« on: July 23, 2009, 06:58:21 am »

Ok this need alittle clarrity for me, what does basic infantry mean?
Logged
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2009, 06:59:31 am »

Tommies and Sappers.
Logged

i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
HansVonLuk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 220


« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2009, 07:02:21 am »

well that pretty useless in a commado base tree then,  why use saper for piats when you have piat commados and I dont use more than 3 toomies with brens so a t 4 for just 3 squads nice.  So this promotes a non commado base battallion in a commando docterine, go figure.
Logged
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2009, 07:03:54 am »

You should always have more Tommies than commandos, they are not meant to be used as mainline inf.
Logged
HansVonLuk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 220


« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2009, 07:07:18 am »

You should always have more Tommies than commandos, they are not meant to be used as mainline inf.


Really?  I have 4 cammandos and 3 piat comandos, you telling me i should then purchase 8 squads of tommies? oh yeah an that does include the cammanod support weapons.   Have you ever create a Brit Commado commpany? 
Logged
EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2009, 07:10:42 am »

You have less than 8 tommies? What kind of fail company is that
« Last Edit: July 23, 2009, 07:12:26 am by EliteGren » Logged
Baine Offline
Steven Spielberg
*
Posts: 3713


« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2009, 07:16:54 am »

You have less than 8 tommies? What kind of fail company is that

Have you ever create a Brit Commado commpany? 

I have 5 or 6 tommies in my, can't remember.
Logged

EliteGren Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6106


« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2009, 07:19:09 am »

But I agree, seems kind of out of place for commandos, should be moved to RE or RCA.
Logged
CafeMilani Offline
Aloha
*
Posts: 2994



« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2009, 07:20:53 am »

You have less than 8 tommies? What kind of fail company is that

now he begins to understand..
why buy standart inf when u can get enough elite inf through reinforcement packages and doctrines. your very slow elite gren^^
Logged

Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2009, 07:22:51 am »

What people fail to realize is just because the name of your doctrine is "infantry"/"commando" or "airborne" DOESNT MEAN THAT YOUR ENTIRE COMPANY NEED TO CONSIST OF COMMANDOS ONLY, ENDLESS AND ENDLESS WAVES OF AIRBORNE DROPPING LIKE BACTERIA ..*snip*

Hell, companies like this just end up getting super raped by a equally one-dimensional company that happen to be the antimatter to your matter.

Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
CafeMilani Offline
Aloha
*
Posts: 2994



« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2009, 07:24:12 am »

many guys think like this smokaz
i think the best example is sourdiesel  Cheesy
Logged
HansVonLuk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 220


« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2009, 07:27:49 am »

You have less than 8 tommies? What kind of fail company is that

Huh fail company??? It seem to work with only 5 tommies 3 bren , 2 vanilla, what?  "Am I suppossed to have more?

Logged
HansVonLuk Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 220


« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2009, 07:30:35 am »

What people fail to realize is just because the name of your doctrine is "infantry"/"commando" or "airborne" DOESNT MEAN THAT YOUR ENTIRE COMPANY NEED TO CONSIST OF COMMANDOS ONLY, ENDLESS AND ENDLESS WAVES OF AIRBORNE DROPPING LIKE BACTERIA ..*snip*

Hell, companies like this just end up getting super raped by a equally one-dimensional company that happen to be the antimatter to your matter.



LOLz, no i have a mix of units, but not in suffient amounts APPARENTLY!


Commandos can do that, mortor, mgs, piat and mandos that four squads and they can pretty much fill you company up.
« Last Edit: July 23, 2009, 07:34:06 am by HansVonLuk » Logged
Baine Offline
Steven Spielberg
*
Posts: 3713


« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2009, 07:41:08 am »

What people fail to realize is just because the name of your doctrine is "infantry"/"commando" or "airborne" DOESNT MEAN THAT YOUR ENTIRE COMPANY NEED TO CONSIST OF COMMANDOS ONLY, ENDLESS AND ENDLESS WAVES OF AIRBORNE DROPPING LIKE BACTERIA ..*snip*

Hell, companies like this just end up getting super raped by a equally one-dimensional company that happen to be the antimatter to your matter.

It's not that we make commandos only companies, but you want to have some in your company to use them for full effect.

4 Commandos will cost alot, use 2 Piat commandos and a commando sniper and thats half your company.

Your ranger only company didn't do that bad in the past did it Tongue
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #14 on: July 23, 2009, 08:10:46 am »

Then again rangers were cheaper than commandos, and better 0.o

You could gear them up with thompsons/zooks exactly how you needed, and thompson only rangers were the best assault infantry in the game.

+ they came with the best healing in the game

So it wasnt one dimensional, it was part of a logisticly supported infantry tactic.

If the ranger system had survived to date, it would be even more viable as you could pick up "stacked" +4 rangers and reapers for decent zooks.

Piat commandos just arent that awesome against people who know what they are doing, imo sappers are much worse as they can cloak in cover and take 2 members without their at capabilities being affected (compared to 1 piat commando) + now they are getting zeal. I dont even wanna think about how much damage a cloaked 2 man zeal piat squad is gonna do to a p4.. or how fast the volleys are gonna come.

But yeah, I understand your point. I just think that people are not going to try to fight your mandospam with infantry at all, people will learn your ways and youll get flammenwerfers/tanks in the face. Once they stop engaging your spam with the unit type they are intended to counter, you're fucked.
Logged
Mukip Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 450



« Reply #15 on: July 23, 2009, 08:34:27 am »

Zeal only affects Tommy squads btw so Piats won't benefit.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #16 on: July 23, 2009, 08:37:53 am »

Well thats just plain unfair then, if british zeal was implemented (i think its just stealing from terror) it should affect sappers too
Logged
CafeMilani Offline
Aloha
*
Posts: 2994



« Reply #17 on: July 23, 2009, 08:39:27 am »

sappers, but not piats  Roll Eyes
Logged
Baine Offline
Steven Spielberg
*
Posts: 3713


« Reply #18 on: July 23, 2009, 08:40:15 am »

It's just a little weird that commandos get fewer buffs than tommies in the doctrine. If it were either tommies or commandos - so you could choose to buff either tommies or go commando - then it would be more viable imo.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.096 seconds with 36 queries.