stumpster
Honoured Member
 Posts: 2197
|
|
« on: January 08, 2008, 09:33:42 pm » |
|
So I've got a question for all of you. The argument against AT-Centric battles is that tanks are the dominating force, and once the opposing force runs out of AT, they rule the day. Apparently, we still are focusing on AT-Centric battles. However, I would like those who are arguing for yet another decrease to AT costs to watch this replay.
Long story short:
My Sherman is the only tank surviving on the field, yet the opponents still have plenty of AT to bring against it. They brought out six Shrecks and one PaK against my single tank. This was a very good balance of power, at least in my opinion, because while they had plenty of AT to 'get the job done', it was used almost wastefully and my Sherman was able to mop up for a win.
Steinmarder and Apoxian vs. Stumpster and Stannis
Battle #821
[attachment deleted by admin]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Step out of the way. He'll keep going until he hits a wall, that being Akranadas. Let him go unmolested, his journey will take less time. |
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2008, 11:25:29 am » |
|
Is this on the new version?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fldash
Founder
Posts: 9755
|
|
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2008, 11:26:12 am » |
|
No.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2008, 11:31:41 am » |
|
Stumpster should've put this on the dev forums then  . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CommanderNewbie
|
|
« Reply #4 on: January 09, 2008, 11:37:44 am » |
|
We like to learn too, you know |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
CommanderNewbie - Allied
Prydefalcn - Axis
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2008, 11:38:39 am » |
|
Well he doesn't need to "proof" anything to the public  . |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fldash
Founder
Posts: 9755
|
|
« Reply #6 on: January 09, 2008, 11:47:25 am » |
|
Well, Ucross, Akranadas, and stumpster all played a game last night and Ucross told me they were all in agreement that costs needed to be lowered a bit more.
That was after this game...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2008, 11:51:04 am » |
|
So that was before the latest cost changes then? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fldash
Founder
Posts: 9755
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2008, 11:53:42 am » |
|
Exactly. But I re-did my company after this latest round of cost changes and I couldn't even afford any more AT. Although I do have some fausts on 3 Volks that might cause some problems to some light vehicles... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CommanderNewbie
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2008, 11:57:06 am » |
|
Exactly. But I re-did my company after this latest round of cost changes and I couldn't even afford any more AT. Although I do have some fausts on 3 Volks that might cause some problems to some light vehicles... Haven't had a chance, but I've gone with a lot more fausts in my latest axis company. The fact that there are 2 per (even with the 15s reload) is going to be a serious deterrant for harrassment by enemy vehicles. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Kolath
Commander, 2nd Infantry Division
Posts: 2382
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 09, 2008, 12:00:32 pm » |
|
Yeah the 2 use really makes the fausts much more viable. Nothing is better than a croc trying to run down your volks and suddenly blasting it with 3 fausts at point blank!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Kolath's Quote Commandments:
1. Thou shalt not quote the entirety of a post 3 or less posts above you
2. Thou shalt not quote more than 2 nested levels
3. Thou shalt not quote large blocks of text when one sentence would do
4. Thou shalt not quote images!
|
|
|
|
