acker
|
« Reply #20 on: June 06, 2008, 06:40:47 pm » |
|
The US 60mm mortar mobility sounds like a indirect buff to make up for firepower inadequacies when directly fighting the Axis mortar.
For once, no problems with the patch.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
GamerAndy
|
« Reply #21 on: June 06, 2008, 07:34:46 pm » |
|
I am indeed incorrect - Bazookas got an accuracy nerf and a damage nerf vs light vehicles
Whats up with this?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dr.Nick2
|
« Reply #22 on: June 06, 2008, 07:36:21 pm » |
|
Only thing I can think of is they are trying to discourage Ranger spam still.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
GamerAndy
|
« Reply #23 on: June 06, 2008, 07:42:47 pm » |
|
As far as EiR goes, this goes in and rangers will need a price drop or a stat buff to where it is now - They already have trouble dealing with flammenwerfers and pumas on their own now
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
[AB]RikiRude
|
« Reply #24 on: June 06, 2008, 09:29:30 pm » |
|
That ranger change just doesn't make sense to me, at least for EiR, are they even that OP in vCoH?
|
|
|
Logged
|
My available companies: Allies: *AB company going for raid assault Infantry going for tank reapers Axis: *Defensive going for rocket artillery Blitz going for lightning war And an experimental Terror company going for subversion consisting of all volks and two King Tigers
|
|
|
Bonte
|
« Reply #25 on: June 06, 2008, 09:32:40 pm » |
|
omg the days of completely steamrolling starting platoons with pumas are back...lightning war here i coem!
|
|
|
Logged
|
I'm too candid to hide something like that. Candid - frank; outspoken; open and sincere: a candid critic You must really think im an idoit.
|
|
|
[AB]RikiRude
|
« Reply #26 on: June 06, 2008, 10:34:13 pm » |
|
holy crap, lightning war pumas would be faster then a vet 0 bike wouldn't they!!! good lord.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
stumpster
Honoured Member
Posts: 2197
|
« Reply #27 on: June 07, 2008, 12:11:13 am » |
|
They already were.
6.4 * 1.25 = 8.
Standard bike - 7.2
|
|
|
Logged
|
Step out of the way. He'll keep going until he hits a wall, that being Akranadas. Let him go unmolested, his journey will take less time.
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
« Reply #28 on: June 07, 2008, 02:57:12 am » |
|
That ranger change just doesn't make sense to me, at least for EiR, are they even that OP in vCoH? Hardly, and Wehrmacht T4 really murders Rangers :/. (Especially the Ostwind/KCH combo)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Duvka
|
« Reply #29 on: June 07, 2008, 04:31:47 am » |
|
That ranger change just doesn't make sense to me, at least for EiR, are they even that OP in vCoH?
They murder both vet 3 kch, or tripple defensive vet Pgrens with mp44 and groupzeal hands down, and add veterancy on em they're beasts.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Profile's: Duvka, Razor, KleinInDerHosen, Akvud.
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #30 on: June 07, 2008, 04:50:34 am » |
|
Of course an Allied vet 3 will beat an Axis vet 3.
|
|
« Last Edit: June 07, 2008, 05:44:54 am by jackmccrack »
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
Thirteen
|
« Reply #31 on: June 07, 2008, 06:45:52 am » |
|
You're right, why allow US mortars to go in HTs and not axis mortar Also can anyone change this statement. - British Sten SMGs are less effective (damage from .75 to .6, accuracy from .85 to vs Infantry_heroic target type (Knights Cross Holders) to - British Sten SMGs are less effective (damage from .75 to .6, accuracy from .85 to .8 ) vs Infantry_heroic target type (Knights Cross Holders) It looks silly with the smiley face =) I looked at the official changelog. Stens actually did go from .85 to Badass.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|