Reniforcemnets

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Mr Hat 93]

The whole idea of being able to bring in units from the friendly fracyion was good.

ex Pe will beable to get weapon crews
Americans were be abled to use lt's and capitans
Brits can used the Elite ameriacn inf squads  (Eagles ,Rangers)


Burt currenty the allied inf renforecmest are unhlepful

Rifleman
Rangers
57
Gretohund

The rifleman offer nothing much more than than tommy slections besdie stickies and the rfilegrandes can be used as long as you keep the sqaud alive no rechrage time making them bettr than rilfeman's handgrandes.

Rnagers Well, there fine

57 Is not much better than 6 pounder and it can't cloath

Greyhound is competely fucking worhtless i have alerdy 2 stoughound's ion my company why would i want another ac.

I woulds suggest to repalce the M 8 With a 1/2 track
and/ or switch 57  with eng.
That way it offers a triage center flamethrowthrother and mine also
a faster troop transport and  with quad a validable weapon to use agiants fachlizlangers

[Tymathee]

well you wouldn't be able to b uild triage so that doesn't matter.

but yeah, maybe changing greyhound with the halftrack would be more helpful for the British than the m8. Otherwise, having riflemen and rangers are two infantry staples so thats why they're there. If you're an allied copany, having more rifles is very useful and for british, you get stickies, grenades a wan that suppression with bars, how could you not want that?

[DasNoob]

Mr. Hat,

Please proof read your post with a spell checker in the future for ease of read by the community.


Everyone, lets keep on topic of this thread or I will lock it.

[AmPM]

Epic thread

[spinn72]

it needs a sniper i think.  In Supply Sniper however.

Riflemen and Rangers are okay, Riflemen have bars so you have something which can supress.  Rangers are proper AT as well and also good at killing inf.

Instead of the Greyhound, 1 Quad would be cool as well, make it 1/1/1 availability.

[Unkn0wn]

Yea we might give them the quad and give the armour one a T17.
Maybe.

[BigDick]

Yea we might give them the quad and give the armour one a T17.
Maybe.

omg a brit blob with quad support it will be feel like hell on earth

the only thing a true brit blob can be stopped is at least 2 hmgs with infantry and flamer support...

with a quad its GG

[brn4meplz]

BigDick don't be an idiot, all of 005 the Armour reinforcemt had quads and you rarely saw a british quad if they did take it. Hell their cost was only 150 MP then too and you still didn't see many(if any) so it clearly wasn't a problem then

[sururu]

Any news on the possibility of the Quad beeing changed to infantry reeinforcements?

LopesHugo

[Fingertrapped]

Put the mg with a medikit on in a stone building or between green cover and watch the quad fail