*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 28, 2024, 03:47:25 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]

[December 14, 2022, 12:10:06 am]

[September 22, 2022, 06:57:30 am]

[August 22, 2022, 05:10:35 pm]
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: British armored jeep(BC)  (Read 8305 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Halfling Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 70



« Reply #20 on: July 04, 2009, 10:39:46 am »

Some of my friends used the carriers long before the buff.
Logged

just Halfwhining sometimes Wink
Baine Offline
Steven Spielberg
*
Posts: 3713


« Reply #21 on: July 04, 2009, 10:41:39 am »

I saw one get hit by panther shell and then a schrek, it was still driving  Smiley

Yeah i saw one get hit by 2 V1s and two KingTigers once, and not taking any damage. That's what a friend of a friend of a someone i know well told me.
Logged

Bubz Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 726



« Reply #22 on: July 04, 2009, 10:42:24 am »

lol
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #23 on: July 04, 2009, 12:02:41 pm »

In my opinion, this change only made the bren carrier be more up to par with the IHT - they now have the same HP and armor, with the IHT having a much better gun and more slots to carry units in.
Logged

Piotrskivich Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 542



« Reply #24 on: July 04, 2009, 12:04:11 pm »

And the Bren carrier has an extra fighting slot. Can it still button?
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #25 on: July 04, 2009, 12:12:25 pm »

No it can not.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #26 on: July 04, 2009, 12:14:42 pm »

Has anyone actually looked at the old and new armor type for the BC and found out how less/more dodgier this change has made it?
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #27 on: July 04, 2009, 12:38:48 pm »

Made bren carriers 60 percent easier to hit by paks on the move. No change if stationary.
Same for Panzerschreck.

Made bren carriers harder to hit by P4s when on the move.

Logged
Atlanton Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 66


« Reply #28 on: July 04, 2009, 01:51:30 pm »

I run with tons of bren carriers with flame engineers in my infantry/commando company, and I will admit that they are kind of ridiculous.

A flame bren carrier can waltz around pak 38's, take out MGs with no damage taken, can take out all infantry that don't have panzershrecks or fausts, and can get out of dodge before panzershrecks, panzer 4's, etc can respond to it. I recently played a game where a bren carrier with a flame engineer squad took on two mp40 volksgrenadier squads and won with no damage. Granted, the player probably didn't know that volksgrenadiers don't do much damage to a bren carrier.
Logged
gamesguy2 Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 2238


« Reply #29 on: July 04, 2009, 01:54:55 pm »

I run with tons of bren carriers with flame engineers in my infantry/commando company, and I will admit that they are kind of ridiculous.

A flame bren carrier can waltz around pak 38's, take out MGs with no damage taken, can take out all infantry that don't have panzershrecks or fausts, and can get out of dodge before panzershrecks, panzer 4's, etc can respond to it. I recently played a game where a bren carrier with a flame engineer squad took on two mp40 volksgrenadier squads and won with no damage. Granted, the player probably didn't know that volksgrenadiers don't do much damage to a bren carrier.

This is different from an IHT how?
Logged
brn4meplz Offline
Misinformation Officer
*
Posts: 6952


« Reply #30 on: July 04, 2009, 02:05:07 pm »

It's not, he just hasn't used IHT's w/ Flame pio's which perform much much better witht he IHT's suppression values kicking in
Logged

He thinks Tactics is a breath mint

Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  Tongue

the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom Wink
Atlanton Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 66


« Reply #31 on: July 04, 2009, 02:37:00 pm »

It's not, he just hasn't used IHT's w/ Flame pio's which perform much much better witht he IHT's suppression values kicking in

I have used an infantry halftrack with flame pioneers. And maybe it's just the way I've used the IHTs, but honestly, the Allies can deal with a fast moving vehicle much better than the Axis can.

And I didn't realize when I made my initial post, that IHTs are now more resistant to small arms fire than they are in vCOH.
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #32 on: July 05, 2009, 12:23:53 am »

Actualy, the pak has a vertical speed 25 percent higher than the 57 mm. The panzershreck is more accurate than the bazooka at medium range. The RR phases through all light vehicles if it rolls a miss against them, not just the puma(staghounds ftw yay!).
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 36 queries.