airborne doctrine

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[EliteGren]

What do you mean no one has access to them? I just used them yesterday in my games.

[Demon767]

Most of the time your AB tuck and run from Puma's and AC's, they chew up IHT's and most of the other vehicles listed it's worth their time to sit there and fire at them. so the no bonus thing is rather irrelevant against those. They are still worth it to heft around RR's

That wasn't my point. My point was that the whole "AB armor is uber" statement is flawed.

also Airborne armor have a resistance to Flames. right?

[Mysthalin]

Flamethrowers - no buff at all.

also Airborne armor have a resistance to Flames. right?

Unless flames and flamethrowers are differing weapon entities and I can't find the flames themselves, then no - AB armor is just as succeptible.

What do you mean no one has access to them? I just used them yesterday in my games.

You can't have used them yesterday because they were only implemented today. Wasn't aware of it when I posted that, however.

[Mukip]

How do you get Airborne Rifles?

[EliteGren]

You can't have used them yesterday because they were only implemented today. Wasn't aware of it when I posted that, however.

Wrong.

[fallensoldier7]

About flames, I thought AB armor takes full damage to flames.  I recall Smokaz making a post about the things that are effective vs AB, and among them were grenadier grenades and flames.  PIVISTs do a lot of damage too but only when they hit.

[lionel23]

To my knowledge, flamers do extra damage to elite units (such as Rangers and Airborne) as their armor makes them more resistant to small arms but more vulnerable to specialty weapons.. same goes for Knights Cross... unless I am mistaken?