[CW] Vickers MG emplacement

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[nugnugx]

It currently is underpriced.

1)

It has the longest range out of all bunkers and mg nests, but the cost is the same of 55mu.

2)

It is in support pool and does not require  pioneers or engies to build which take infantry pool, you can spam it alot because it costs 3 pool value.

[PonySlaystation]

Every faction can build mg nests for a low price. But they still don't. Why?
Because you only need one or two at the same time. A mobile mg is still much better.

The pool value is maybe a little too low.

I think sappers should have mines and mg nest.

[LeoPhone]

vickers is the best mg bunker in the game.

but it is more pop and also costs MP while other bunkers cost only MU on your engineers. not to mention the thing can be decrewed by nades and flames.

[nugnugx]

but it is more pop and also costs MP while other bunkers cost only MU on your engineers. not to mention the thing can be decrewed by nades and flames.

Don't forget you have to pay for engineers , and they take inf pool value, if you want to spam bunkers or amer mgs you have to invest alot of  inf pool neglecting your other inf.

If you want to spam vickers , you use up support pool.

[Unkn0wn]

AFAIK we were going to rework the vickers to become a normal mg nest upgrade for sappers eventually. That or it will be reworked with the emplacement rework (where the vickers mg crew will be able to build the mg nest fortification to garrison)