31stPzGren
|
|
« on: June 11, 2009, 04:40:06 am » |
|
Rather than give BARs to AB, why not make all allied infantry paradroppable instead with the Airborne T4 doctrine? Will encourage a whole new dimension of gameplay.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18378
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2009, 04:54:48 am » |
|
Way ahead of you, we've already made some substantial changes to a lot of the doctrines, especially the higher tiers. So expect to see those documented soon  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Guderian
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2009, 04:59:28 am » |
|
How the hell can you guys manage doing this epic winners all the time?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Eir customer support staff.
|
|
|
Akranadas
Honoured Member
 Posts: 6906
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2009, 05:00:19 am » |
|
Dedication.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Duckordie
Community Mapper
 Posts: 1687
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2009, 05:05:17 am » |
|
You see that in 2.0
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
^<-- Duck ™ and ©
We need more axis players!:
|
|
|
| pernik
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2009, 05:23:13 am » |
|
Pfffff, I want those BARs on my Airborne!  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2009, 05:25:40 am » |
|
Not particularly useful, and only there for the 'cool' factor - what makes airborne good is not how they enter the field, but their high HP per man, and fire-up. Along with one of the best manpack AT sources in the game.
I'd rather go for implementing the M1A3 carbine - automatic version of their standard carbine, rather than the BARs, but it would give the weapon to every soldier using the M1A1 version of the carbine. A 1-1.5 second 5-6 ROF burst with 10 percent lower damage and accuracy at all ranges compared to the standard carbine. 1.5-2 second cooldown, 3 bursts per clip, standard reload. Should be fun, original to the airborne, and not OP, as it would be rather inferior to the BAR, and without suppresion fire. It would also buff rifles by a very small ammount - the leader uses a Carbine.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Akranadas
Honoured Member
Posts: 6906
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 11, 2009, 05:27:11 am » |
|
Airborne Sticky bombs aren't useful?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 31stPzGren
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 11, 2009, 05:40:13 am » |
|
I was thinking the concept of an entire para-droppable force allows you to set up ANYWHERE on the map, executing a flank ANYTIME when needed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2009, 05:42:32 am » |
|
Airborne Sticky bombs aren't useful?
Good luck paradropping straight on a mobile tank with a 30 second drop timer. No, it is not useful, in the least. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Akranadas
Honoured Member
Posts: 6906
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 11, 2009, 05:43:21 am » |
|
Get the 10 second drop timer doctrine ability.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 11, 2009, 05:49:19 am » |
|
And yet, 10 seconds is a timescale in which a tank is very likely to move, and the tank user will definately notice the green smoke to gtfo from the sticky. Even more fun if it's a puma/ostwind... You're just better off paradropping an RR - a proper airborne company will not have stickies in it anyways.
It's not at all useful, or even considerable as a T4. Paradropping rangers could be fun, but still, meh.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18378
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 11, 2009, 05:50:26 am » |
|
Hence why its not a T4.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 11, 2009, 06:24:15 am » |
|
MY plan for AB was to get the Support teams the Early drop and the 10 second fall. That way i could deploy earlier in R mode and actually have time to setup a delay with support weapons before the other guy hit the field. With the changes we're looking at it really makes me have to choose.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted!  the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom  |
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
 Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 11, 2009, 06:45:33 am » |
|
So soon we will see Crocs and M10 dropping from the sky to finish of the crippled heavy tanks?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18378
|
|
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2009, 06:46:27 am » |
|
No, you will see jeeps getting paradropped though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
|
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2009, 07:17:03 am » |
|
So soon we will see Crocs and M10 dropping from the sky to finish of the crippled heavy tanks? I'd love if my Crocs did any damage to heavy tanks! lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 31stPzGren
|
|
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2009, 07:18:21 am » |
|
No, you will see jeeps getting paradropped though.
8 jeeps to hunt the sniper? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
 Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2009, 07:20:06 am » |
|
yay, pzgren and mystalin deploy behind you ALL THE TIME! yea this is gonna be fun
[/sarcasm]
bad idea. what an uber t4
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nugnugx
Donator
Posts: 4051
|
|
« Reply #19 on: June 11, 2009, 07:20:23 am » |
|
can luft paradrop 88 lolz
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
