Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #20 on: July 31, 2009, 03:05:51 pm » |
|
At least you see AB doing more than just pwning things with their winrifles this way
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
SaintPauli
|
« Reply #21 on: July 31, 2009, 03:16:47 pm » |
|
It’s the reason I started playing air again. Something good that doesn’t involve spam/blobbing…
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #22 on: July 31, 2009, 03:18:23 pm » |
|
btw, nothing wrong with heavy support, people would just rather have German Steel and Ferocity.
and the old heavy support was waaaay over powered and could lock down a map.
I bolded that part that tells you something is wrong with the Doctrine Tym, just in case you missed it. Heavy support should be range, health, maybe damage, remove the sight bonus. It makes it better, as well as requiring spotters to gain full advantage forcing teamplay or at least tactical deployment. Is there anyone that uses Heavy Support that wants to chime in?
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!" "I have proof!" "Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
SaintPauli
|
« Reply #23 on: July 31, 2009, 03:19:36 pm » |
|
Is there anyone that uses Heavy Support that wants to chime in?
No because it suck… Now can we all get back to the topic…
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
« Reply #24 on: July 31, 2009, 03:28:12 pm » |
|
i wanted to get it before they changed it but now german steel is much better (5 p4 )
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EliteGren
|
« Reply #25 on: July 31, 2009, 03:37:05 pm » |
|
To quote salan from an old thread: completely agree with you, the range is hte main thing that makes it what it is.
And that is now gone.. It worked wonderful on the sniper and that is exactly what needs to come back.
|
|
|
Logged
|
i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
|
|
|
FailHammer
|
« Reply #26 on: July 31, 2009, 03:41:47 pm » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What, people flocking around to hijack a place on my balls on their ballride to victory and PEEPEES?
Im not pulling this out of my ass, you tinfoil hat prostitute. "Holy shit puddin, you just critted him in the face"-joseph54
|
|
|
Bubz
|
« Reply #27 on: July 31, 2009, 04:16:53 pm » |
|
It’s the reason I started playing air again. Something good that doesn’t involve spam/blobbing…
Looks like you can only play easymodes Pauli
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SaintPauli
|
« Reply #28 on: July 31, 2009, 05:03:06 pm » |
|
It’s the reason I started playing air again. Something good that doesn’t involve spam/blobbing…
Looks like you can only play easymodes Pauli Yes. I waited so long before I started playing airborne again because I simply didn’t think that Mudkips company was powerful enough…
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jazlizard
|
« Reply #29 on: July 31, 2009, 05:04:13 pm » |
|
I have heavy support. I'd trade it away in a flash.
|
|
|
Logged
|
The MOD is over. The war is over. We're too lazy to restart it. You can all go fuck pickles mom, I hear she's easy.
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #30 on: July 31, 2009, 05:16:23 pm » |
|
Is there anyone that uses Heavy Support that wants to chime in?
No because it suck… Now can we all get back to the topic… I'm trying to get on topic by asking someone who has heavy support how it plays, its' so easy to look at the numbers and stats and say "oh, this sux" but in game it could be different, which is wh y i asked.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jazlizard
|
« Reply #31 on: July 31, 2009, 05:57:22 pm » |
|
I hardly even notice I have it, the range advantage is negligible. I sometimes wonder if it's even working on mortars, or at least their barrage ability. The extra damage is ok, the health I don't notice as much, perhaps it takes an extra hit from a barrage, otherwise it dies just as easily as anything else.
I don't use snipers much so, can't really say how good or bad it is from that aspect. For MG42 it just lets em fire a bit further away, not very noticeable.
I'm not sure why ATGs aren't effected anymore, but I guess since there was so much PAK hate a few months back *shrug* Then again I didn't agree with that change either.
I only bought this ability because I know there was going to be a reset, having used the old version (in original EIR) I wanted to see how the new one was, since the ability was nerfed before it was even able to be purchased in EIRR.
Oh well, the only thing I can hope for now is that there is enough data to show that almost no one picks this ability as a T4, I know I don't plan on purchasing it again.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EliteGren
|
« Reply #32 on: August 01, 2009, 11:57:05 am » |
|
Any comment from devs about the current state of heavy support?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
EIRRMod
Administrator / Lead Developer
Posts: 11009
|
« Reply #33 on: August 01, 2009, 02:37:57 pm » |
|
Any comment from devs about the current state of heavy support?
I liek bananas.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shit I'm pretty sure you could offer the guy a cup of coffee and he'd try to kill you with the mug if you forgot sugar.
That's like offering Beer to fuck the fat chick. It will work for a while, but it's not gonna last. Not only that, but there is zero motivation for the Fat chick to loose weight.
Why don't you collect up your love beads and potpourri and find something constructive to do.
|
|
|
LuAn
|
« Reply #34 on: August 01, 2009, 02:43:53 pm » |
|
Almost killed me
|
|
|
Logged
|
aka UckY
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #35 on: August 01, 2009, 03:32:54 pm » |
|
lol
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #36 on: August 01, 2009, 08:52:08 pm » |
|
What tier is Heavy Support again? I forgot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
LuAn
|
« Reply #37 on: August 01, 2009, 08:53:51 pm » |
|
What tier is Heavy Support again? I forgot.
Thats a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #38 on: August 01, 2009, 08:54:53 pm » |
|
No.
(Edit: After reading through the thread I've realized it's a T4)
|
|
« Last Edit: August 01, 2009, 08:59:27 pm by jackmccrack »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #39 on: August 01, 2009, 08:58:31 pm » |
|
Sounds really weak for a T4, beyond weak.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|