bristiler
|
|
« on: August 16, 2009, 11:50:30 am » |
|
Could we remove elite inf from Rpackages before anyone unlocks them???
or disable packages till removed?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 16, 2009, 11:52:02 am by bristiler »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2009, 11:52:30 am » |
|
I dont even think the reinforcements packages are available atm. Do they even cost the 50pp?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| Wolster
|
|
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2009, 11:56:08 am » |
|
Suits me, i would usually only get extra Storms, but they are laughably expensive & highly ineffective for cost atm....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2009, 11:57:45 am » |
|
They're not working right now (or shouldn't be)
We're working on a new list, once that's done they'll be coming back. (Without elite infantry)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| bristiler
|
|
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2009, 12:03:21 pm » |
|
ok since it still said lvl 5 next to it I thought they were still availible, at that would send it back to the unhappy spam we had found ourselves in before. Thanks for the heads up and not letting people have more elites.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Groundfire
EIRR community manager
EIR Veteran Posts: 8511
|
|
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2009, 12:03:54 pm » |
|
That could've been done differently. Its silly to get an airbourne package with no airbourne in them. (idk, mabey put airbourne riflemen in the package instead of normal airbourne?)
i think that availability could have been fixed for this stuff. like all elite inf. only in reserve, and you only get 2, oversupply costs a shit ton of PPs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DasNoob
|
|
« Reply #6 on: August 16, 2009, 12:14:57 pm » |
|
Yeah they may not come back at all... it was a fail Salan idea   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DISASTER AVERTED... IM A MOTHER FUCKING GENIUS! You have DasNoob who uses the mod as COHTV
|
|
|
| crimsonrabbit
|
|
« Reply #7 on: August 16, 2009, 12:18:47 pm » |
|
Good, no elite inf in R packages, however you guys should rename the packages something else though since it wouldnt make sense to name a package w/o airborne, airborne package.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I defy all laws of scienceee.
This is Bunny.
Copy and paste bunny into your signature to help him gain world domination
(\__/)
(+'.'+)
(")_(")
|
|
|
RikiRude
Donator
Posts: 4376
|
|
« Reply #8 on: August 16, 2009, 12:24:48 pm » |
|
someone suggested making them like what, support, armor, and infantry packages?
i liked the idea of getting at least one special unit from each doctrine. maybe with something like AB, you could make the availability +2/+2 or even +1/+1
maybe even have the reinforcement packages be 3 different units not 4.
i dont know i thought reinforcements were really cool.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea" ... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid |
|
|
| Armfelt
|
|
« Reply #9 on: August 16, 2009, 12:27:45 pm » |
|
Its silly to get an airbourne package with no airbourne in them.
An easy solution for that is to change the names of the packages. Eg. into: British armour, American support etc. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "Well opinions are like assholes, everybody has one." |
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2009, 12:47:36 pm » |
|
Yeah they may not come back at all... it was a fail Salan idea what about the handheld AT price increase?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Armfelt
|
|
« Reply #11 on: August 16, 2009, 01:00:21 pm » |
|
Yeah they may not come back at all... it was a fail Salan idea what about the handheld AT price increase? I think that the price change is OK. It shouldn´t be a valid tactic to take out anti-infantry vehicles with infantry. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
