Baine
Steven Spielberg
 Posts: 3713
|
|
« on: March 08, 2010, 07:06:30 am » |
|
Hey, so i just thought of some things that i would like/have liked to see in the Defensive doctrine. I thought about a buff to MGbunkers. Can you guys make them have the same line of fire the american MG bunker has? That could be an additional buff to the "Defensive Positions" T3. Another idea, to give Paks back one more cloaked shot or maybe even all 3. Addition to the T4 "Camouflage Equipment". And something groovy, a new unit that would probably never happen unless someone has a model for this. Some kind of mobile bofors, to move around like a pak. That thing would come in handy as light vehicle counter. And it would definately look cool  Movable like the nebelwerfer for example. Tell me what you think. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lionel23
Donator
 Posts: 1854
|
|
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2010, 07:13:36 am » |
|
Explain what you mean by the one more cloaked shot? As in let it rapidfire and never leave cloak or something?
And I'll have to disagree on the moving bofors as the British one can't move, and it would seem weird that a defensive player could move theirs while the engineer equivalent (if ever implemented) could not move theirs...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations, dear sir...I must say, never before have I seen such precise gunnery displayed. - CrazyWR (on Leaderboard Howitzers)  |
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2010, 07:16:41 am » |
|
No i mean let the Pak shoot twice before it gets revealed.
And i don't know, there could probably be an equivalent unit for the engineer doctrine aswell. It doesn't have to be restricted to Defensive.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Griffith
|
|
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2010, 07:19:14 am » |
|
Thats not a bad idea for the Pak, would make Camo equip a bit nicer, doesn't seem like anyone i've talked to wants it so far.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Deutschland Uber Alles In Der Welt!
|
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2010, 12:15:09 pm » |
|
and while we're at it, make the british bofors movable as well lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2010, 12:17:27 pm » |
|
and while we're at it, make the british bofors movable as well lol.
brits already have Brens and ATGs they don' need a moveable bofors Axis could use some sort of a vehicle stopper so that LV spam finally begins to shrink The tiny PAK 37 could be useful for Anti infantry and light vehicle purposes. If it has similar stats to LATH it could carry treadbreaker and focus fire as a upgrades |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 08, 2010, 12:19:09 pm by NightRain »
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
| Sixpack
|
|
« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2010, 03:04:24 pm » |
|
and while we're at it, make the british bofors movable as well lol.
brits already have Brens and ATGs they don' need a moveable bofors Axis could use some sort of a vehicle stopper so that LV spam finally begins to shrink The tiny PAK 37 could be useful for Anti infantry and light vehicle purposes. If it has similar stats to LATH it could carry treadbreaker and focus fire as a upgrades What PAK 37??? Do you mean the PAK 36? ^.^ |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2010, 03:22:27 pm » |
|
I know you guys are busy with the other doctrines but any comment on this? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2010, 03:24:14 pm » |
|
and while we're at it, make the british bofors movable as well lol.
brits already have Brens and ATGs they don' need a moveable bofors Axis could use some sort of a vehicle stopper so that LV spam finally begins to shrink The tiny PAK 37 could be useful for Anti infantry and light vehicle purposes. If it has similar stats to LATH it could carry treadbreaker and focus fire as a upgrades 50mm puma? pak? schrecks? fausts? mines? goliaths? uhhhh TANKS? why do i seem to be one of the few axis players who whine about LV spam? I have no issues with it tbh. and most axis players seem to kick my light vehicles butt. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbsmith
The Brain and Muscle
 Posts: 2778
|
|
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2010, 03:25:06 pm » |
|
No i mean let the Pak shoot twice before it gets revealed.
And i don't know, there could probably be an equivalent unit for the engineer doctrine aswell. It doesn't have to be restricted to Defensive.
That allows an exploit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
prove it and you'll win
I win.
k u win.
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2010, 03:27:08 pm » |
|
No i mean let the Pak shoot twice before it gets revealed.
And i don't know, there could probably be an equivalent unit for the engineer doctrine aswell. It doesn't have to be restricted to Defensive.
That allows an exploit. Not on the pak or does it? Shouldnt it be just a reverse like moving paks? The second sentence was referring to the comment made about how unfair it would be to have a moving bofors on axis side but not on allies. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbsmith
The Brain and Muscle
Posts: 2778
|
|
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2010, 03:28:22 pm » |
|
It would allow you to take a shot at an at gun then hold fire for like 2 seconds then take another shot and never get revealed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
