Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
« on: May 27, 2010, 01:16:00 pm » |
|
It's time for another developer feedback session!
Post your top, number 1, balance gripe with EIR:R. One post per player, don't turn it into a balance discussion. Unit/Upgrade balance only, no doctrine abilities. So only pricing, pop, availability issues.
|
|
« Last Edit: June 14, 2010, 03:46:36 am by Unkn0wn »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2010, 01:44:03 pm » |
|
there is simply no reason not to buy t17 sandbags. i would suggest change t17 health to average of with- and without sandbags. and give the sandbags armoured skirts stats (better defense vs the stuff it kills, infantry. while harldy buff vs tank and pak guns)
|
|
« Last Edit: May 27, 2010, 02:08:02 pm by LeoPhone »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2010, 01:51:44 pm » |
|
Scout car with MG needs to go up both in price and popcap.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sharpshooter824
I <3 Aloha
EIR Veteran Posts: 775
|
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2010, 01:52:49 pm » |
|
Definitely the PE's LATHT, the reason being is it is 3 pop for a vehicle disabler/infantry sniper. I have used this quite a bit, it is extremely cost efficient with focus fire considering it comes with it and is not a munitions upgrade like it used to be (Focus fire needs to be reverted to a purchaseable upgrade, maybe 30-40 munis?) Along with this it should be raised to 4 pop.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Rawr
|
|
|
brn4meplz
Misinformation Officer
Posts: 6952
|
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2010, 01:52:57 pm » |
|
Tigers blow
|
|
|
Logged
|
He thinks Tactics is a breath mint Wow I think that was the nicest thing brn ever posted! the pussy of a prostitute is not tight enough for destroy a condom
|
|
|
SX23
|
« Reply #5 on: May 27, 2010, 01:54:30 pm » |
|
Hotchkiss stukas, having a little fire effect like the nebel would be nice. Right now, it can't do anything or almost against infantry. (1 arty volley kills 1-2 guys while 1 howie volley can easily kill up to 10, not to mention the suppression).
|
|
|
Logged
|
With Courage shall we Rise, With Might shall we Fight, With Glory shall we Stand, With Honor shall we Falter, For the Fatherland shall we Prevail.
|
|
|
wildsolus
Donator
Posts: 807
|
« Reply #6 on: May 27, 2010, 02:00:13 pm » |
|
comparing the hotchkiss stuka and howi is retarded sx23
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rocksitter
|
« Reply #7 on: May 27, 2010, 02:01:54 pm » |
|
Shooting while moving in carriers is just garbage on all sides...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
« Reply #8 on: May 27, 2010, 02:07:40 pm » |
|
50mm PE at ht, overspammed by everyone.
m10 missfiring 50% of the times (well I know that it's relic but...)
On a sidenote noone plays allies.
|
|
« Last Edit: May 27, 2010, 02:10:15 pm by Draken »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CrazyWR
|
« Reply #9 on: May 27, 2010, 02:08:23 pm » |
|
50mm PE ATHT being totally borked in terms of targeting priorities from enemy units...like an m10 targeting a shrek squad over the 50mm...
or carbines. Either one really.
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
|
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2010, 02:10:24 pm » |
|
50mm PE ATHT being totally borked in terms of targeting priorities from enemy units...like an m10 targeting a shrek squad over the 50mm...
50mm ATHT uses pak targetting tables, there is no priority problem with them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2010, 02:12:23 pm » |
|
50mm ATHT uses pak targetting tables, there is no priority problem with them. Actually there is, vehicles and tanks prioritise PzIV ISTs and all kinds of other less dangerous units over 50mm HTs for example.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
|
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2010, 02:14:09 pm » |
|
50mm ATHT uses pak targetting tables, there is no priority problem with them. Actually there is, vehicles and tanks prioritise PzIV ISTs over 50mm HTs for example. Oh I misread it, you were talking about enemy units targetting the 50mm HT, my bad. There is still no problem. The P4 IST has target type Panzer IV, the 50mm HT has target type PE light armored car, which it shares with the vampire HT, mortar HT, etc. Would you rather your sherman shoot the P4 or that vampire half track?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2010, 02:22:33 pm » |
|
His point is that you should just give the 50mm HT a different target type
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Malgoroth
Donator
Posts: 960
|
« Reply #14 on: May 27, 2010, 02:23:33 pm » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spartan_Marine88
|
« Reply #15 on: May 27, 2010, 02:24:52 pm » |
|
Shooting while moving in carriers is just garbage on all sides...
Brens/Roos = Clowncar yes there is some differences but its balanced tbh not like 17pdr to 88mm
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
|
« Reply #16 on: May 27, 2010, 02:27:13 pm » |
|
His point is that you should just give the 50mm HT a different target type There isn't another target type I can use. Each one is used by one unit or another.
|
|
« Last Edit: May 27, 2010, 02:30:00 pm by gamesguy2 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
wildsolus
Donator
Posts: 807
|
« Reply #17 on: May 27, 2010, 02:37:12 pm » |
|
flammens are pointless to purchase when compared to puma and only a 20mp difference
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SX23
|
« Reply #18 on: May 27, 2010, 02:42:38 pm » |
|
comparing the hotchkiss stuka and howi is retarded sx23
I'd just want them to have some little anti infantry capability. Not to mention they only shoot 4 rockets instead of 6 on other axis arty.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CrazyWR
|
« Reply #19 on: May 27, 2010, 02:54:37 pm » |
|
my point is that tanks should not be shooting shrek squads before 50mm HT's. Along with other silly priorities.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|