UndeathWrath
|
« on: July 01, 2010, 04:07:54 pm » |
|
I think it's a little weak for 50mu. Compared to the stug (the other low cost axis tank) it isn't as good.
I think it's cost should be lowered a little or it should be made slightly more effective (perhaps on par with the stug's mg)
|
|
|
Logged
|
tank130: oh noessss....I can't counter your big, unmovable anti tank gun with my much smaller, mobile, and cheaper anti tank gun....... WTF... the horrors of imbalance.......
|
|
|
MittinsKittens
Donator
Posts: 916
|
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2010, 04:09:21 pm » |
|
I think the idea is so it has a slight way to defend itself, I don't think you're meant to be using it as an AI tank, It is a AT gun on wheels after all. Get some proper AI around it and then you won't have much of a problem
|
|
|
Logged
|
EiRNames:- MittinsKittens & FlutterShyPegasus
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
|
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2010, 04:13:06 pm » |
|
I think it's a little weak for 50mu. Compared to the stug (the other low cost axis tank) it isn't as good.
I think it's cost should be lowered a little or it should be made slightly more effective (perhaps on par with the stug's mg)
You know, threads like this makes me laugh so hard. The geschutzwagon MG is identical in every single way to the stug MG.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2010, 04:15:28 pm » |
|
even though his thread fails, the stug can at least survive a bit better than the geschutz, so that should be seen back in the price.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
|
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2010, 04:18:49 pm » |
|
The geschutz shouldn't even have an MG. It's a mobile AT gun. 57mms and paks don't get a mounted HMG now do they?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MittinsKittens
Donator
Posts: 916
|
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2010, 04:19:44 pm » |
|
even though his thread fails, the stug can at least survive a bit better than the geschutz, so that should be seen back in the price.
But...the Range is bigger then the StuG afaik, Might even be bigger then Shermans if I seen it right, If so, Then the weakness of the unit makes sense. You're trading Range for Durability
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UndeathWrath
|
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2010, 04:19:52 pm » |
|
good for you it doesn't seeem that way
maybe cuz i don't have all the statics right in from of me like you do?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
Posts: 2238
|
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2010, 04:20:30 pm » |
|
even though his thread fails, the stug can at least survive a bit better than the geschutz, so that should be seen back in the price.
But...the Range is bigger then the StuG afaik, Might even be bigger then Shermans if I seen it right, If so, Then the weakness of the unit makes sense. You're trading Range for Durability Geschutz has the marder gun. Range is 60 IIRC.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UndeathWrath
|
« Reply #8 on: July 01, 2010, 04:20:38 pm » |
|
just delete this thread since its so fail
|
|
« Last Edit: July 01, 2010, 04:22:51 pm by UndeathWrath »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MittinsKittens
Donator
Posts: 916
|
« Reply #9 on: July 01, 2010, 04:25:31 pm » |
|
Geschutz has the marder gun. Range is 60 IIRC.
*Bows*. I know I might not have the complete statistic knowledge about the units like numbers but I've got a rough idea about it Undeath, Which seems to be a bit more then you :<
|
|
« Last Edit: July 01, 2010, 04:27:45 pm by MittinsKittens »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
UndeathWrath
|
« Reply #10 on: July 01, 2010, 04:33:07 pm » |
|
I wasn't talking to you. I was talking to gamesguy. He think i'm an idiot because I didn't know the geeschutzwagon MG is the same as the stug one cuz I don't have the statistics either.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Flashpoint Gold
|
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2010, 10:48:50 pm » |
|
The geschutz shouldn't even have an MG. It's a mobile AT gun. 57mms and paks don't get a mounted HMG now do they?
Oh gawd yes! I want a pak with a mounted mg42.
|
|
|
Logged
|
This is my signature, this is where I put all these little tidbits that show my character or just random things I found funny. Well you know what? EFF YOU!!!!1
|
|
|
Silverstone
|
« Reply #12 on: July 01, 2010, 11:12:53 pm » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lionel23
Donator
Posts: 1854
|
« Reply #13 on: July 02, 2010, 12:24:58 am » |
|
Its a good defensive upgrade to rushing infantry, I know as a ranger player I HATE fighting them if they got a stug MG on top of them. Not like rushing a hellcat with a .50cal which does crap.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations, dear sir...I must say, never before have I seen such precise gunnery displayed. - CrazyWR (on Leaderboard Howitzers)
|
|
|
Computer991
Donator
Posts: 1219
|
« Reply #14 on: July 02, 2010, 12:33:20 am » |
|
The geschutz shouldn't even have an MG. It's a mobile AT gun. 57mms and paks don't get a mounted HMG now do they?
PAKS GET LUGERS I WANT FREE LUGERS FOR MY GECHUTZ!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Uunderfire
|
« Reply #15 on: July 02, 2010, 03:31:32 am » |
|
The geschutz shouldn't even have an MG. It's a mobile AT gun. 57mms and paks don't get a mounted HMG now do they?
PAKS GET LUGERS I WANT FREE LUGERS FOR MY GECHUTZ! Yeaah mounted lugers roxxx
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #16 on: July 02, 2010, 03:33:05 am » |
|
The 1 luger on the pak crew isn't really all that good...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Uunderfire
|
« Reply #17 on: July 02, 2010, 03:42:40 am » |
|
The 1 luger on the pak crew isn't really all that good...
Yes but on an officer luger roxx
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rifle87654
|
« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2010, 05:59:52 am » |
|
The geschutz shouldn't even have an MG. It's a mobile AT gun. 57mms and paks don't get a mounted HMG now do they? Choices for Devs: 1)reskin that "geschutz" shopping cart. Remove that gunner if you can't use that mg. It's weird seeing a timid gunner crouching inside a tank. And putting his hands on his head. 2)Give the 3rd Pak crew lmg 42, and give the 3rd 57mm crew Bar with supress button. Don't forget the 6 pounder, it's 3rd crew should get a bren that can button. So the shopping cart gets it's mg back.
|
|
|
Logged
|
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha hahahahah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahaha hahahahah
Does he have a problem? Anyway he's hilarious.
|
|
|
sheffer
|
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2010, 01:51:03 pm » |
|
I choose red\second.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Senseless and ruthless.
|
|
|
|