*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 20, 2024, 10:22:57 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [cw]stuart tank  (Read 8722 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #40 on: February 09, 2011, 04:07:51 pm »

all those light vehicles i mentioned have the same thing, I Think the difference is that puma's are longer than all the allied light vehicles, so it looks more likely to miss and go thru but trust, i've seen shots go right thru my LV's many a times.

still think all vehicles should have the homing turned off, would make for much more interesting game play Cheesy
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Firesparks Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 1209



« Reply #41 on: February 09, 2011, 09:12:07 pm »

but it seems Puma is the only one that has 'phase armor' working as Firesparks called it.  Stuart has same armor as m8 but you don't see missed shells going through stuart like you see on puma. (nor on m8 t17 stag ac for that matter)

M8 t17 stag acs - when shell misses , but hits the hull , damage is calculated

puma - shell misses, but goes through the hull without damage like puma would be a ghost

m8, t17, stag, acs, and puma all have ghost armor against tank shell.
the stuart and hotchkiss do not have phase armor.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2011, 09:16:30 pm by Firesparks » Logged


With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC 1925
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.053 seconds with 35 queries.