*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 09, 2024, 08:43:17 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Poll
Question: PE Sniper?
Yay!
Nay:(

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Poll for PE sniper  (Read 4934 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« on: June 14, 2011, 01:16:01 pm »

Poll for PE sniper thread, let's see how community thinks!
Logged

TheIcelandicManiac Offline
Resident forum troll. Fucked unkn0wns mom
*
Posts: 6294


« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2011, 01:19:52 pm »

Thread and poll Locked in  10...9...8...7...6...5...



OK ok i wont spam this thread or anyother thread for the next month.
« Last Edit: June 14, 2011, 01:25:03 pm by TheIcelandicManiac » Logged

Quote from: Grundwaffe
Soon™
gj icelandic i am proud of u  Smiley
Sometimes its like PQ doesnt carrot all.

Work Harder
nugnugx Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4051



« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2011, 01:20:33 pm »

Thread and poll Locked in  10...9...8...7...6...5...
Not if you won't spam it.
Logged
8thRifleRegiment Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2210



« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2011, 03:21:25 pm »

GerbJaegers ftw -_- the only thing we should take from OMG' the Gerishjaegar
Logged


I will never forget the rage we enduced together

Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2011, 04:04:13 pm »

I say give it a try, my stance is if commando sniper shall stay in its current form then PE should get some sort of sniper unit.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2011, 04:09:10 pm »

hmm,Gerb dudes,why then brits need mando sniper? they already have recon tommies with marksmen shot  Roll Eyes
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2011, 04:11:34 pm »

but not such shit recon snipe shot unit that would be worthless

whenever they should get a normal sniper unit or something like commandosniper
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2011, 04:38:14 pm »

shit I picked wrong option lawl
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #8 on: June 14, 2011, 04:40:09 pm »

I'm surprised that the majority voted yes on this considering most players suffer from delusions such as "x unit is OP because I don't use it" or "I only play x faction/doctrine so I'm voting no on this"
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2011, 11:13:02 pm »

but not such shit recon snipe shot unit that would be worthless

whenever they should get a normal sniper unit or something like commandosniper


Tell it to 8th,for some reason he thinks they would be just awesome  Roll Eyes


It's like when people want pe medium tank with turret,but someone comes and says,here,lets give em Pz2(something with stats of stuart) that would be way much better Roll Eyes
Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #10 on: June 15, 2011, 12:13:17 am »

8thrifle is noob he thinks support grens are great and he thinks 50mm AT HT is better than marder  and that T4 mun HT mg is a real mg42 Roll Eyes

to have a cheap unit just doing recon snipe (like stalin suggested 3 pop 180mp) is worthless except when they are spammed (recon "tommy" spam 2.0) if used like 2 squads in a company it will be worthless

the recon tommies on brit fills a different role than just using its recon element

they are the scouts the detection and the snipercounter (and other than ampm said in other thread...the best snipercounter is recon squad in brencarrier) and a "cheap" recrew unit that still remains with its abilities after recrew 1 weapon....
thats what pe has scoutcars, ketten, schwimmwagen etc. for and such suggested unit does not have the abilities recon tommies have

as sniper you want something that continously annoys the opponent that can take out a specific support weapon in 2 sec that can scout a bit when needed
Logged
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #11 on: June 15, 2011, 12:18:31 am »

you can 'annoy'  enemy every 80sec LOL ...fail...
Logged
Heartmann Offline
Officer of Kindness
*
Posts: 1776



« Reply #12 on: June 15, 2011, 01:44:33 am »

Go sniper!
Logged

In the basement getting drunk.
It's not really creepy until I show up.............

- I've heard of being an animal in bed but...

- The phallic principle of the Navy Wink
spinn72 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1802



« Reply #13 on: June 15, 2011, 02:20:31 am »

I play a solid game on PE without a sniper, and I'm guessing 24 players can't  Grin
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2011, 02:57:11 am »


to have a cheap unit just doing recon snipe (like stalin suggested 3 pop 180mp) is worthless except when they are spammed (recon "tommy" spam 2.0) if used like 2 squads in a company it will be worthless


I wasn't suggesting anything. I was merely expressing my reaction to the possibility of such a squad.

I'd get 40 of them Smiley.
Logged

spinn72 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1802



« Reply #15 on: June 15, 2011, 03:26:56 am »

But then you'd need a new signature to reflect your break up with volks Mysthalin =(
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2011, 03:28:33 am »

Mysthalin doctrine is merely about the use of cheap and plentiful units as opposed to expensive ones, rather than one tied exclusively to volks.

The volks wouldn't really mind.
Logged
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2011, 03:39:34 am »

I play a solid game on PE without a sniper, and I'm guessing 24 players can't  Grin

It's not easy to use a sniper well but if it was added then more interesting strategies and tactics would develop. If you have used a WM sniper together with some PE support then you'd know it works fine, something like this would only give the PE players more options.

Giving the PE a sniper is not the same as giving them a huge buff. It's simply giving them an alternative. The unit would still cost a lot of manpower and munitions like the other snipers. So there's no easy win or huge buff that would somehow break the balance. If that was the case then a WM sniper teamed up with a PE player would be unstoppable, but it's not.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2011, 03:58:06 am by PonySlaystation » Logged
BigDick
Guest
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2011, 03:56:23 am »

I wasn't suggesting anything. I was merely expressing my reaction to the possibility of such a squad.

I'd get 40 of them Smiley.

thats what i meant if such unit is spamed and a whole company is build out of it they will probably rock otherwise they will just suck and its not noticeable to snipe 1 guy every 1.5 min or something

I play a solid game on PE without a sniper, and I'm guessing 24 players can't  Grin

i played some great wehr/US/brit companies without a sniper and?
that doesn't mean it can't be handy to have one
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 38 queries.