PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #40 on: July 13, 2011, 05:57:47 am » |
|
I never found Wehr to require a lot of micro, since they have some of the best support weapons in the game it's a pretty easy and straightforward faction to play 'ok'. Brits is the WM of allies as far as I'm concerned. PE & US are where it's at.
US are notably easier because of M10s, M8s and their fewer and more simplistic units. PE are easier because of their infantry, some builds can of course rely heavily on vehicle micro/kiting but proper vehicle micro is rare. They also don't have many low pop units (well maybe scout cars) meaning significant fewer units to micro. How micro intense PE can be is heavily dependent on your build. CW are notably easier than all the other factions because of their even fewer and even more simplistic units. Current CW is of course a big step in the right direction from vCoH but I still wish they had more units. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 05:59:41 am by PonySlaystation »
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #41 on: July 13, 2011, 05:58:35 am » |
|
Who is the best allies (US) player anyway here in the community?
Can he write some "tactic guide". I would pay for it per paypal.
Yes I play US and Wher now...
You can put $150 in my off shore account please |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
doesnttalkmuch
Donator
 Posts: 113
|
|
« Reply #42 on: July 13, 2011, 06:01:05 am » |
|
write a tactic guide first...
What is CW?
Yes I play US and Wher now...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
now you live [Click] now u r dead
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #43 on: July 13, 2011, 06:01:51 am » |
|
PE are easier because of their infantry what is so great about PE inf I fail to see,each PE inf can be countered by a mere bar... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #44 on: July 13, 2011, 06:02:38 am » |
|
what is so great about PE inf I fail to see,each PE inf can be countered by a mere bar...
Easier to micro when you only have one type of infantry and don't have to rely on support weapons as much. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| smurfORnot
|
|
« Reply #45 on: July 13, 2011, 06:10:27 am » |
|
how is pe inf easier to micro compared to wehr,us and brit one?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #46 on: July 13, 2011, 06:16:12 am » |
|
how is pe inf easier to micro compared to wehr,us and brit one?
Only one type of infantry, fewer upgrades and they don't have to rely on support weapons as much. US and WM have to support their infantry with HMGs, Flamers, Officers etc meaning more units to micro. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #47 on: July 13, 2011, 06:26:59 am » |
|
How do PE not have to rely on support weapons? Seems like you rarely ever play PE.
And a proper PE build is one that uses vehicles, not one that rolls around with pgren blobs.
And if anything, those low cost low survivability make the US faction harder to play than their Wehr or CW counterparts. It takes a better player to make the most out of US units than it does to play WM. Which is why most new players struggle heavily with US and generally do a lot better with WM.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| PonySlaystation
|
|
« Reply #48 on: July 13, 2011, 06:30:59 am » |
|
Easier to micro, not easier to play. All factions are hard to play, I don't think you can measure something like that. Many PE players build less micro intense builds like having many ISTs, Hummels, FJs. Just as I said I rarely see PE players use vehicles well but how much micro required is dependent on your build.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 06:33:33 am by PonySlaystation »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #49 on: July 13, 2011, 06:36:58 am » |
|
i dont know how you can rationlise that ISTs are any less micro intensive then any other unit that PE can hold.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
doesnttalkmuch
Donator
Posts: 113
|
|
« Reply #50 on: July 13, 2011, 06:39:29 am » |
|
What is CW? What are ISTs?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #51 on: July 13, 2011, 06:45:42 am » |
|
What is CW? What are ISTs? Commonwealth, British Infantry Support Tank (Panzer IV IST) And don't troll, demon. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
doesnttalkmuch
Donator
Posts: 113
|
|
« Reply #52 on: July 13, 2011, 06:48:00 am » |
|
ISTs
...ok the P4 with the short cannon which deals a lot of splash damage vs US infantry.
Thx4info
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #53 on: July 13, 2011, 06:53:19 am » |
|
How do PE not have to rely on support weapons? Seems like you rarely ever play PE.
Just because thats what you want it to be, does not make it true. Best PE is infantry spam PE. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18379
|
|
« Reply #54 on: July 13, 2011, 06:56:37 am » |
|
The faction's still designed to resolve around the use of vehicles, even more so in EIR.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kwiatekkek
okultysta, mistyk, szachista i alpinista.
 Posts: 702
|
|
« Reply #55 on: July 13, 2011, 07:15:41 am » |
|
PE is wicked with vehicle based coys imo. i usualy dont get to call on my non mobile inf on my TH before the game ends. i do however have one inf strong SE coy, and its soooo booring to play. its like u play an OMG game  slow and loooong  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
  "L2P" is like a Auswitcz tattoo on your arm, a mark of the survivor.
*cough* Team Lead is Allied bias, just FYI
|
|
|
| BigDick
|
|
« Reply #56 on: July 13, 2011, 07:49:31 am » |
|
Only one type of infantry, fewer upgrades and they don't have to rely on support weapons as much. US and WM have to support their infantry with HMGs, Flamers, Officers etc meaning more units to micro.
i even use hmgs as PE..and i would use much more support vehicles when i did not have to rely on fuel based AT Just as I said I rarely see PE players use vehicles well but how much micro required is dependent on your build.
because the AT its up most fuel (150fuel for each piece of AT except u r tankhunter) but i still have a 24 vehicle and a 21 vehicle tankhunter company |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 13, 2011, 07:51:06 am by BigDick »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #57 on: July 13, 2011, 05:50:02 pm » |
|
He is getting annoying Unknown  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
