*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 11, 2024, 04:25:40 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: A few Pool values  (Read 5667 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« on: September 28, 2011, 06:38:24 pm »

1. Normal Sherman is 12 pool, and jumbo is 14 pool, and we all know jumbo is worth a bit more than that.

I suggest 17 pool jumbo.

2. 3 man KCH is 9 pool. 4 Man KCH is 9 pool.

I suggest 4 man KCH is put to 12 pool.

Just wanted to try to get this in before next patch.

p.s. remember to fix terror ambulance plox
« Last Edit: September 28, 2011, 07:00:16 pm by DarkSoldierX » Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2011, 06:50:04 pm »

1. Lmao...that'd be more than a panther which rapes a Jumbo and also more than a tiger in pool value.
2. I might agree there.
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2011, 07:00:00 pm »

Woops.

Ok 17 pool jumbo.

And even it if was 19 pool it would be far below pershing/tiger pool.
Logged
TheVolskinator Offline
Administrator / Lead Developer
*
Posts: 3012



« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2011, 07:13:00 pm »

Ive always thought that 11 or 10 pool for the regular sherman would be fair, seeming as the P4 is *generally* a better tank. I digress.

Jumbo is so expensive you can only field 3 max, and that puts a serious crutch on the amount of infantry you can field. IMO the pool is fine as it is, cuz a stug with pak support will easily floor a jumbo.
Logged

Quote from: tank130
I want to ensure we have a 100% decision on the process before we do the wipe.
If not, then I wipe, then someone gets something they shouldn't, then it gets abused, then the shit hits the fan and then I ban shab.

Getting EiR:R Released on Steam

Forum Rules & Guidelines
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2011, 07:22:13 pm »

Woops.

Ok 17 pool jumbo.

And even it if was 19 pool it would be far below pershing/tiger pool.


you should be banned from balance for suggestions like this.


pool values are fine, although due to its price i think panther should drop to 13-12 pop
Logged

Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2011, 07:32:48 pm »


although due to its price i think panther should drop to 13-12 pop
you should be banned from balance for suggestions like this.

You think a jumbo sherman is only 16.6% better than a normal sherman? No wonder you loose so much lol
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2011, 07:48:14 pm »

totally agree with KCH and oaks leaves, not sure about the jmbo, if it was increased you'd have to bring up panthers/tigers/KT/jagd.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2011, 08:12:01 pm »

Don't let your allied bias get to you.

How about a compromise, 16 pool jumbo.

We all know a jumbo's relative power is nowhere near only 16.6%(how much more pool the jumbo cost compared to sherm) more than a sherman.
Logged
Audemed Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 644



« Reply #8 on: September 28, 2011, 08:18:18 pm »

Does the jumbo's pool cost really matter? It's not like you'll even have any more armor other than 2-3 of them.
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #9 on: September 28, 2011, 08:26:01 pm »

Does the jumbo's pool cost really matter? It's not like you'll even have any more armor other than 2-3 of them.
Yes.
Logged
MorkaandBorka Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1464



« Reply #10 on: September 28, 2011, 08:31:36 pm »

Ive always thought that 11 or 10 pool for the regular sherman would be fair, seeming as the P4 is *generally* a better tank. I digress.

Jumbo is so expensive you can only field 3 max, and that puts a serious crutch on the amount of infantry you can field. IMO the pool is fine as it is, cuz a stug with pak support will easily floor a jumbo.

Actually the sherman is just as good or better than p4.  Me and speedy even tested it out.
Logged

I'm really bad  - Smokaz
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #11 on: September 28, 2011, 08:57:50 pm »

you should be banned from balance for suggestions like this.

You think a jumbo sherman is only 16.6% better than a normal sherman? No wonder you loose so much lol

Keep dragging my win/loss ratio in to this eh? I know for a fact that i am alot better of a player then you.

well why dont you face me then, oh yeah its a team game. I win you say its because of my team, you win you say its all you.

Pool is only 1/4 of the cost. To properly look at the unit state its manpower, munitions, fuel and pool cost.
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2011, 09:07:38 pm »

Wrong assumptions, pool represents units overall power, as it is meant to reduce spam, and you cannot compare it directly to normal resources, its impossible.

And if pool is only 16.6% more, that assumes it is only 16.6% better than a normal sherman, which it clearly isn't.
Logged
Audemed Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 644



« Reply #13 on: September 28, 2011, 09:53:21 pm »

Are un-upgraded rangers really 2 1/3 better than riflemen? I think not, but the pool cost demands that they be!

In conclusion:

Buff rangers.
Logged
Malgoroth Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 960


« Reply #14 on: September 28, 2011, 10:22:38 pm »

This topic is fail. 12 pool for 4 man KCH? You must be high. 3 man KCH pool should drop 1 or 2 points. 4 man pool shouldn't jump 3. That's ludicrous.

But pools values aren't the mods problem atm.
Logged
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2011, 01:06:10 am »

You also forgot to take into consideration that the Jumbo also is 13 pop, while this may not seem like much its enough of a difference.
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2011, 04:47:28 am »

Blarg.

With the connections you people are making, we can make jumbo 20 pool, but reduce cost by 40%, and it would be fine.

Alright 3 man kch should be 8 points, but no way 4 man should be 9 , it should be like 11 or something.
Logged
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2011, 07:09:36 am »

Blarg.

With the connections you people are making, we can make jumbo 20 pool, but reduce cost by 40%, and it would be fine.

Alright 3 man kch should be 8 points, but no way 4 man should be 9 , it should be like 11 or something.


No that is not fine. What i am saying is that you have to look at EVERYTHING in the cost before changing ANYTHING.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 36 queries.