Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2012, 01:06:20 am » |
|
+1 nikomas
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #21 on: February 19, 2012, 02:49:11 am » |
|
you should have been around when they had phosporus round,so they could stun tanks...every one had them
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
« Reply #22 on: February 19, 2012, 03:24:02 am » |
|
you should have been around when they had phosporus round,so they could stun tanks...every one had them i was around for that. WHY THEY NURF ALL THE FUN STUFF
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #23 on: February 19, 2012, 03:26:41 am » |
|
because it raped everything? you send counter for t17 - tank,he stunns it and atg just kills it....if you dont see nothing wrong with that,your view on balance is strange.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #24 on: February 19, 2012, 03:31:18 am » |
|
Phos Rounds were soo funny
|
|
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
Computer991
Donator
Posts: 1219
|
« Reply #25 on: February 19, 2012, 04:09:39 am » |
|
Before I go to bed I need to say 1 thing..
Staghounds suck major fucking dick, because they are incredibly overpriced for what they do they are priced the way they are because people can't deal with them.
Staghound > T17
3 Staghounds can beat a p4....3 t17's can't even tickle a p4.
That is all.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CrazyWR
|
« Reply #26 on: February 19, 2012, 04:09:58 am » |
|
they made t17s fun. T17s now are just another vehicle.
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
« Reply #27 on: February 19, 2012, 04:58:01 am » |
|
because it raped everything? you send counter for t17 - tank,he stunns it and atg just kills it....if you dont see nothing wrong with that,your view on balance is strange. i didnt say it was balanced i just asked why they nurf fun stuff. most stuff thats fun isnt balanced. roo carries assault nades AB tank reapers old.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #28 on: February 19, 2012, 05:06:20 am » |
|
so who is using assualt nades after the fix or AW? DIdnt see a single coy using it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
« Reply #29 on: February 19, 2012, 05:49:37 am » |
|
so who is using assualt nades after the fix or AW? DIdnt see a single coy using it.
i use AW other then that no one.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
|
« Reply #30 on: February 19, 2012, 06:30:02 am » |
|
Why the living crap are you peoople discounting the T17 because of the lackluster AT ability? That's not it's role to begin with, if you want to take out a P4 get an atg or a hellcat or something.
Also, you say you need "3" stags to take out a P4... Well, that's the thing, you can deploy T17's on their own and they will sweep infartry just fine.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else." The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #31 on: February 19, 2012, 06:44:22 am » |
|
Probably because its an unlock.
Also, flammenwerfers are bad because they dont kill light vehicles! Hello.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smurfORnot
|
« Reply #32 on: February 19, 2012, 06:55:49 am » |
|
can we add that flame crit affects tanks? Like you hit fuel tank or something,and tank goes boom,or engine gets blown!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
Posts: 1447
|
« Reply #33 on: February 19, 2012, 07:56:40 am » |
|
can we add that flame crit affects tanks? Like you hit fuel tank or something,and tank goes boom,or engine gets blown!
+1. When this get implemented we will see more trollol charges with Cromwell/Sherman -Crocodile. Just driving through the enemie lines and dealing damaged engines as if they are a special offer at this day.
|
|
|
Logged
|
9th Armoured Engineers
|
|
|
nikomas
Shameless Perv
Posts: 4286
|
« Reply #34 on: February 19, 2012, 08:50:24 am » |
|
Only engines? There was a reason crews from a certain nation were only allowed to abandon a tank if it was "on fire"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
Posts: 1447
|
« Reply #35 on: February 19, 2012, 09:31:02 am » |
|
Only engines? There was a reason crews from a certain nation were only allowed to abandon a tank if it was "on fire" Your right, too. There should be critical that the tank crew open the turret while there in flames trying to escape from the burning tank and retreating off map! (Like ATGs for example). And the enemie can recrew the tank...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Poppi
|
« Reply #36 on: February 19, 2012, 06:11:49 pm » |
|
Why the living crap are you peoople discounting the T17 because of the lackluster AT ability?
their main focus on anti inf is also lackluster. A lot of missing or just not enough damage to units with high HP. IM kind of a fan of t17 but at times it can be super pathetic. And i have had teammates yell at me for bring them on the field. i guess long distance inf sniping is the only way to play it. they wont scare off a inf charge or even put a dent in it
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
3rdCondor
Donator
Posts: 1536
|
« Reply #37 on: February 19, 2012, 08:34:10 pm » |
|
why the fudge does this thing cost as much pool as a sherman and more then a staghound ffs. the t17 cant even penetrate rear armor HT. on another note what is a stuart tank good for? it doesnt seem very good ai compared to the staghound.
Once upon a time the T17 raped the living snot out of everything in EIR. It was nerfed to oblivion, lost its phosphorous round ability, and pool cost increased. Justifiable? Up for debate.
|
|
|
Logged
|
No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #38 on: February 19, 2012, 10:11:56 pm » |
|
Maybe if its gun was reverted to vCoH stats, yes? It was changed, right?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #39 on: February 20, 2012, 12:46:01 am » |
|
Maybe if its gun was reverted to vCoH stats, yes? It was changed, right?
It was changed to old vcoh stats. New VCoH stats is superlame.
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
|
|
|
|