*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 30, 2024, 12:56:57 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Poll
Question: PE Man Packed Weapons
Fine where they are - 10 (58.8%)
Give 'em all to Luft - 0 (0%)
Get rid of all of them - 2 (11.8%)
Fix the Pak36 and keep - 3 (17.6%)
Give them to the WM Doctrines. - 2 (11.8%)
Total Voters: 17

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [PE] Man-Packed Weapon Unlocks  (Read 4427 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« on: May 08, 2012, 09:47:51 am »

It's my opinion that PE shouldn't have man-packed weapons at all but if there are any, they only fit luft. So the 4 man mg42 in SE and the Pak36 in TH should be taken away or put in with the Luft since they're infantry based.

I don't say this because I think it's an issue, but I say it because it's out of place and not with the doctrine's theme.

Anybody agree with me?
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
PrinceOfScotland Offline
EIR Launcher Demigod
*
Posts: 183



« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2012, 09:49:42 am »

it would likely make luft more often played if they have some foot at they can ambush veichles with. sounds like a good idea to me and hopefully we would see diffrent PE than just SE and TH
Logged

Fixing the launcher, one mistake at a time.
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2012, 10:01:24 am »

now why would I take that shitty pak with luft,when I dont even wanna take it with TD?
Luft already has mg,why put another mg in?
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2012, 12:51:59 pm »

I think Brits should have the kangaroo - but who cares?

Pak 36 needs a buff
« Last Edit: May 08, 2012, 12:55:03 pm by Smokaz » Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2012, 01:37:06 pm »

Kangaroo doesnt serve a pourpose currently with not being able to shoot inside.
Logged

You are welcome to your opinion.

You are also welcome to be wrong.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #5 on: May 08, 2012, 01:53:36 pm »

now why would I take that shitty pak with luft,when I dont even wanna take it with TD?
Luft already has mg,why put another mg in?

well, i'd think you'd get rid of the mg42, the mg36 is imo more useful cuz of its cloak.

The pak36 can always be fixed of course. Make it the t-17 gun with lower infantry accuracy. Could be fun, it was called the door knocker it was so bad at penetrating, much like the t-17.

then it can have an ammo upgrade that allows it to penetrate and break treads
Logged
Jodomar Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 734


« Reply #6 on: May 08, 2012, 02:21:37 pm »

I think they should give the full array of man packed support weapons to PE since the brits have them and really shouldn't.
Logged
tank130 Offline
Sugar Daddy
*
Posts: 8889


« Reply #7 on: May 08, 2012, 02:34:04 pm »

I think they should give the full array of man packed support weapons to PE since the brits have them and really shouldn't.

That would completely change the design of PE.
Logged

Quote
Geez, while Wind was banned I forgot that he is, in fact, totally insufferable
I'm not going to lie Tig, 9/10 times you open your mouth, I'm overwhelmed with the urge to put my foot in it.
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #8 on: May 08, 2012, 02:40:47 pm »

That would completely change the design of PE.

Theres nothing wrong with that.

PE design was built for Vcoh game play.

Wher got changed, Brits got changed. Its time for us to finish American and PE
Logged

Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #9 on: May 08, 2012, 02:45:20 pm »

give us Panzer Elite snipers!
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
Nug Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 394



« Reply #10 on: May 08, 2012, 02:45:55 pm »

give us Panzer Elite snipers!

there is pe sniper already...
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #11 on: May 08, 2012, 02:46:49 pm »

lol pe snipers. if they are like the fallschimjaeger sniper its GEGE. i just remember that thing being a whore to take out.
Logged
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #12 on: May 08, 2012, 02:49:56 pm »

there is pe sniper already...

reward units do not count.
Logged
Nug Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 394



« Reply #13 on: May 08, 2012, 03:02:34 pm »

reward units do not count.

He could be in one doctrine like the brit sniper.
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #14 on: May 08, 2012, 04:00:54 pm »

I think they should give the full array of man packed support weapons to PE since the brits have them and really shouldn't.

Brits are a diff design decision as their support weapons were all emplacements and therefore static.

However, PE is highly mobile so having static weapons with a mobile doctrine is counterintuitive imo, however the brits could take their mobile emplacements and get mobile support weapons and it doesn't change much, they're still rather static but aren't stuck in one place.

There used to be a time when if you were brits and you didn't have another US player with you, you would lose (same with PE)

Logged
Audemed Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 644



« Reply #15 on: May 08, 2012, 05:06:07 pm »

PE's mobility from vcoh doesn't translate into EIR. PG's aren't as durable, and you can't be constantly repairing your vehicles. There is no squad reinforcement on the field either, which are the things that make a mobile PE strong.
Logged
8thRifleRegiment Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2210



« Reply #16 on: May 08, 2012, 05:26:07 pm »

God this is such a horrid thread tbh, lets not be retarded, PE manpacked at is just fine where it is, lets not start removing vcoh units. Every faction needs man pakced at, becuase its universally usefull, without it the factions fail miserably. If i know somebody im playing against has no manpakced at, suddenly i have 8 m8s in my company and the game doesnt last more then 20 minutes becuase they cannt handle my 3 m8 start becuase all they have is madrers and paks.  at the exception of the americans who have a multitude of options other then manpakced, allthough, well microed zooks are scary just as much as schrecks  
« Last Edit: May 08, 2012, 05:33:14 pm by 8thRifleRegiment » Logged


I will never forget the rage we enduced together

Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
Uglysori Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 301

The very best player of one of the four factions.

« Reply #17 on: May 08, 2012, 05:27:40 pm »

Couple points on SE and MG42 Support Squads.  Personally I don't use MG42 squads so I wouldn't particularly miss them.  

However, if the argument that only Luft should have man-packed weapons because they are the only infantry based doctrine of the 3 PE docs, I disagree with Tym.  

SE can be played as a viable infantry based doctrine if a player chooses so.  Getting Storm Tactics T4 increases the effectiveness of all infantry units in Scorched Earth and which can additionally be buffed by Muni HTs.  

In turn, SE can be played defensively given that Area Denial allows all your units to build sandbags, tank traps, road blocks, etc. and I imagine MG42 support squads would do well in that aspect as well as being supported by saturation minefields from Muni HTs.  

Lastly removing MG42s would make Support reserves an extremely lackluster T2 since it would now only open up Panzer Pios and would require a rearrangement of the doctrine unlocks.  Not that the doctrine unlocks could do with a rearrangement and looking at anyways.      
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.077 seconds with 38 queries.