*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 30, 2024, 04:58:15 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Tank Destroyers panthers  (Read 7657 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Shabtajus Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2564


The very best player of one of the four factions.

« on: May 09, 2012, 07:49:38 am »

ok so, i would like to ask what is wrong here?

as we all know m10 is dedicated to be TD. I agree that having 6 or 7 of them its just stupid and hard for axis armour. We got price increase, also endless QQ about about m10 sniping infantry, it does not matter that it takes few shots to kill 1 poor guy. Than allies got this - Main gun accuracy of M10/18 versus infantry reduced to 0.15. I know guys u will be talking about m10 krush ability, it awesome but its so risky (thx to stomrs). Penetration increasing is not so noticable, most of the time shots are bounced (exept hvap, but its other long story).

and here are panthers... correct me if i am wrong, but panthers are TD like m10s? They cost 3x times more but its 3x time harder to kill than m10s. So why panthers can kill inf so effectively? Panther can krush inf as good as m10, i just dont get it why they are not nerfed as m10s vs inf or atgs? Panther can circle atg and kill all crew in 2 shots since m10.....

i am playing both sides so its not allied player BS, just looks like these days its so damn hard to play allies, i would compare playing allies like anal sex for guys who are in jail, still sex but aint fun at all.

My point would be here to reduce at least damn acc vs atgs, cuz its aint coll when tank can kill atgs so fast
Logged


I feel like if Smokaz and Shab met up it would be a 50/50 tossup to see which one of them robbed the other first.
Tries to convince people he's a good guy,says things like this. Scumbag Shab.
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2012, 07:52:06 am »

Panther's have a lovely 0.6 accuracy against infantry.

Start throwing in doctrine unlocks such as Panzer Aces and things become even more fun.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2012, 08:08:07 am »

imo panther accuracy vs inf could be looked at
Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
smurfORnot Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4715



« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2012, 08:09:04 am »

2 m10's came and killed my vet 2 panther  Cry there was even pak behind which managed to get shot or 2.
it's more risky to crush with panther ,cuz of stickies,than it's with m10.
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2012, 08:13:23 am »

Panthers are medium tanks
Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
Shabtajus Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2564


The very best player of one of the four factions.

« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2012, 08:15:03 am »

Damage engine < dead tank

so we can talk what is more risky, and u dont need to krush with panthers u can just shoot inf lol
Logged
NightRain Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3908



« Reply #6 on: May 09, 2012, 08:39:08 am »

The panther itself is fine to be fair. The metagame surely loves them at this point and even if they are annoying with their sniping abilities its not as life threatning as people make it out. The best thing to do however is currently try to prevent their mobility with Mines and ATGs, should they charge, sticky bombs. Anything that can combat a long range vehicle with range is welcome to shoot at them whenever possible. Result: 14 pop doing nothing but staring at a wall. Similar counters apply to any heavy class vehicle.
Logged

Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #7 on: May 09, 2012, 09:37:05 am »

The Panther is a Medium Tank not a Tank Destroyer
« Last Edit: May 09, 2012, 09:40:03 am by Spartan_Marine88 » Logged

Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #8 on: May 09, 2012, 09:39:20 am »

It's because of the pricing, the FU cost needs to be adjusted upwards. They are as or more effective than a Tiger and you can take 3 of them. That is wrong.

Adjust FU cost to 510 and leave skirts at 40. Solved.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #9 on: May 09, 2012, 09:40:39 am »

Not a bad idea AMPM
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2012, 09:43:33 am »

Yeah, price increase. I think they got a 100 fu decrease last time right, might've been too much.
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Shabtajus Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2564


The very best player of one of the four factions.

« Reply #11 on: May 09, 2012, 10:52:04 am »

The Panther is a Medium Tank not a Tank Destroyer

yea its medium, and mediums deals with heavies like pershings without problems haha, yea its medium tank
Logged
Nug Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 394



« Reply #12 on: May 09, 2012, 10:57:07 am »

In real life panther was a medium tank but in CoH it's a heavy tank.
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #13 on: May 09, 2012, 12:08:24 pm »

It's a heavy medium tank destroyer, with the benefits of all and none of their weaknesses.

OMG, the Panther is Blade

tankedit: unrelated pics removed
« Last Edit: May 09, 2012, 04:36:16 pm by tank130 » Logged
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #14 on: May 09, 2012, 12:39:45 pm »

Isnt the panther and later war tanks like those more akin to modern MBT's?
Anyway, the panther is a Medium-Heavy Tank
Logged

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else."

Quote from: PonySlaystation
The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #15 on: May 09, 2012, 01:20:47 pm »

The panther was designated a medium tank, and was the next evolution of the P4.

Its concept was what alot of modern MBT's were designed after. Shab unfortunately doesn't realize how stupid he sounds, and is.

So let me spell it out for him.

The Pershing was also a medium tank. OH MAH GOD!

Guess what it was designed to do? Do everything a tank was supposed to do (this includes killing infantry) as well as be able to pop heavies like the Tiger.
Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #16 on: May 09, 2012, 02:53:36 pm »

Whats this dumb shit about classification.

In EiR, A panther is a for the most part a tank destroyer. How can that NOT be agreed upon? Sure it has .6 acc vs infantry, but you must remember it also has .5 modifier against moving infantry. It also has a near irrelevant splash.

It is quite obviously meant to KILL TANKS. Who fucking cares about what it could do in the real war? Do we see jagdpanthers running around gibbing riflemen with HE rounds? Do we see 76mm shermans with the same high explosive capabilities as the lower velocity gun?
Logged

two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
*waiting* 4 DarkSoldierNoobiX pops up to prove how much shit the T17 is penetrating KTs back and Jagd front and how much better the ac/puma is penetrating m10 rear  Cool Cool Cool
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #17 on: May 09, 2012, 02:54:33 pm »

Actually, Jadg's gib infantry pretty good....as do 76mm Shermans.

Logged
DarkSoldierX Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3015



« Reply #18 on: May 09, 2012, 02:57:56 pm »

Actually, Jadg's gib infantry pretty good....as do 76mm Shermans.


Do you not get the fucking point?

76 sherman has less splash than a 75. Its optimized towards killing tanks rather than infantry compared to the 75mm.

Jagd, he has a 88mm gun, why can't he take on infantry with a REAL HE round if he needs to just like in the real war?
Logged
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #19 on: May 09, 2012, 02:59:43 pm »

lmao.  this argument is ridiculous, it's all about semantics. Who cares about it's classification.

for what it does, does anything need to be changed especially with the new medium and tank destroyer changes.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 36 queries.