Home
Forum
Search
Login
Register
Account
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
November 05, 2024, 09:24:59 am
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Resources
Leaderboards
Unit Price Lists
Map List
Launcher status:
Players in chat: 1
Battles in progress:
Battles waiting:
Download the mod from Steam
Join our Discord server
Recent posts
Please don’t open this th...
by
Olazaika1
[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]
Required age ratings for ...
by
Unkn0wn
[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]
50 minutes cap victory
by
Olazaika1
[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]
Feedback
by
Olazaika1
[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]
Anyone here still alive?
by
Olazaika1
[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]
very glad to be signing u...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]
EiR:R ACA (Art Credits Ar...
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]
Hello, New guy in the mod
by
Olazaika1
[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]
CoH 3 Old Guard
by
chefarzt
[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]
KT got buffs, Rug stop hi...
by
LittleJoe
[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Awards
2007
Mod of the Year
Editor's Choice
2008
Most Innovative Multiplayer
Nominee
Want to help promote Europe In Ruins? It's as easy as clicking here once a day!
Why?
COH: Europe In Ruins
>
Forum
>
EIR Main Forums
>
Balance & Design
>
An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree? (Read 5281 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
on:
May 15, 2012, 11:48:03 pm »
Look at Luft bottom T4.
The buff is tied to UPGRADES, so you have to buy these for doc bonuses to take affect. (Sprint, Overdrive.) They are also more expensive on better units and free on some others? Imagine also being able to buy overdrive on stuff like: wirbel, 50mm, scout car, mortar ht and vampire ht. (vehicles as noted by the buff)
Price of the sprint upgrade varies between 60 and 40. This is kinda expensive to begin with for just the sprint imo, but clearly more than fair for the passive sprint.
Now if sprint perhaps was cut down to 50 (FSJ)- 25 and then when you got the T4, increased in price, 70 - 50 you would possibly have the upgrade/unit balanced for both the doctrine buff and without it.
Who honestly dont think EIRR would be more enjoyable if doctrine buffs were upgrades you paid for on your units? Let's say that T3 to T4 would have purchasable upgrades, and T1-T2s would not.
«
Last Edit: May 16, 2012, 12:08:09 am by Smokaz
»
Logged
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #1 on:
May 15, 2012, 11:59:57 pm »
Why would you buy things that make your company equally as powerful as if you didn't have them?
Just get passive buffs and offmaps, and trololol.
Logged
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #2 on:
May 16, 2012, 12:03:59 am »
Explain to me how it's equally powerful to have much more survivability (say, fatherland defense) utility (Fast Response) or dps (Fantacism) for population than not having these for the same population. I really think you can't, you've been trolling this proposal with the same comment every time, but the criticism lacks merit. Historic example: Double weapons for wehr being removed by EIRRMOD cause he didnt like people stacking their opening callins, now how can you think being able to make stronger populations of units is equally strong to weaker populations of units based on that? I mean are people unlocking stuff that makes their units stronger for pop for no reason?
If your take on this were right, you'd see people respect diminishing returns a lot more. Why get another 2 squads of elite armor grens with grenades if 2 mg42 or a 81mm (that the guy doesn't get a doctrine buff for ) would be more helpful to add on top of your already 16 elite armor grens? There are better examples of diminishing returns but the point still stands, and people tend to maximize the amount of doctrine-affected units in their company.
Adding costs to the significant doctrine buffs is TRUE specialization and choice because you are giving up resources for A so you become better at A possibly at the detriment of your B and C capabilities, while currently A (doctrine affected unit) is just straight up improved in value.
Also this would allow you to CONTROL buffs for your company. You might not want to upgrade some of those elite armor grens so you could have grens with infantry armor as well as elite.
There's a clear imbalance between having a calliope that shoots and moves at 12 pop and a 88 that arties and shoots at 8 pop, and their vanilla versions and price needs to reflect how much better this unit is on the field.
«
Last Edit: May 16, 2012, 01:15:08 am by Smokaz
»
Logged
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
Posts: 5006
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #3 on:
May 16, 2012, 01:19:24 am »
So, are you proposing that the units without buffs should be cheaper, and with buffs at the current price, or with the buffs more expensive and standard units at current price?
Logged
Quote from: xez0 on August 29, 2014, 10:57:01 am
and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
Quote from: Smokaz on November 22, 2011, 09:01:38 am
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #4 on:
May 16, 2012, 01:21:50 am »
I propose that the T3s and T4s should have a cost with them that reflects the unit that is being upgraded and the upgrade itself
Logged
Audemed
Donator
Posts: 644
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #5 on:
May 16, 2012, 02:04:40 am »
That would only work if the buffs were made more powerful. As it stands, most doctrine buffs are relatively insignificant, bar a few such as battle hardened or HVAP.
Logged
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #6 on:
May 16, 2012, 02:13:31 am »
HVAP is nice. i enjoy it on m10s, currently though i kinda gave up on HVAP due to them taking 1 pack shot or 1 panther shot and losing 45% of its effectiveness.
Logged
Quote from: Hicks58 on January 08, 2016, 05:47:37 pm
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
Nug
EIR Veteran
Posts: 394
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #7 on:
May 16, 2012, 05:20:24 am »
There should be consistency. Either you have to pay for them in all doctrines or non at all, it's better for balance.
Logged
EIRRMod
Administrator / Lead Developer
Posts: 11009
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #8 on:
May 16, 2012, 06:18:38 am »
Quote from: Smokaz on May 16, 2012, 01:21:50 am
I propose that the T3s and T4s should have a cost with them that reflects the unit that is being upgraded and the upgrade itself
I think you have spies everywhere Smokaz.
FOR THE LAST TIME!
STAY OUT OF THE BATCAVE!
Logged
Quote from: brn4meplz
Shit I'm pretty sure you could offer the guy a cup of coffee and he'd try to kill you with the mug if you forgot sugar.
Quote from: tank130
That's like offering Beer to fuck the fat chick. It will work for a while, but it's not gonna last. Not only that, but there is zero motivation for the Fat chick to loose weight.
Quote from: tank130
Why don't you collect up your love beads and potpourri and find something constructive to do.
tank130
Sugar Daddy
Posts: 8889
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #9 on:
May 16, 2012, 07:58:25 am »
Jesus Christ!!!!
I actually went and checked your permissions to see if you had Dev lobby access.....LOL
Better, stronger doctrine buffs with an associated cost is exactly what we are working towards.
Balancing all Doctrine buffs equally across all factions with out a form of currency is not working well currently. This system requires each doctrine to be balanced against each other PERFECTLY.
For example, a buff that buffs 'All riflemen' and also, for example, a same tiered WM unlock which buffs 'All volksgrenadiers' would require it to be balanced against EACH OTHER *AND* the doctrine it resides in.
No easy task, but doable, but will never be perfect. It gets further complicated when we try to balance all tiers across 4 factions.
Doctrines with passive and upgradable costs for unlocks:
This system requires that the costs for each unlock / upgrade be balanced against similar types depending on its PLATFORM, rather than other doctrines unlocks that are similar or the doctrine unlocks of other doctrines.
This will allow each doctrine to be 'as powerful' as the other doctrines, or more / less powerful - which would happen depending on the players builds. However, it has the additional benefit of having a quantifiable cost to an unlock, which would allow for balance of the variable type unlocks.
Using the example above, the variable cost of benefit (of how many riflemen) now scales in COST (resources) depending on how many riflemen are chosen. This now allows us to balance across one unit AS WELL as across doctrines - because they all have the same constraints. Bear in mind, the benefit / cost would need to be 'cheap' in regards to the relative bonus given;
Example:
Riflemen +15% damage = 15MU per riflemen. (1 MU per 1% per volks for damage)
Volkgrens +15% damage = 10MU per volks (2/3 MU per 1% for volks for damage)
If that equates to too much MU cost per percent - we can easily perform a UNIT WIDE reduction (for example reduce by 50% - 1/2 MU per % for rifles, or 1/3 MU per 1% for volks)
This system also allows for creativity of better (stronger) doctrines without the negative effect of OP. In the same way we balance unit’s strengths with cost, we can balance doctrine strengths with cost.
Logged
Quote
Geez, while Wind was banned I forgot that he is, in fact, totally insufferable
Quote from: Hicks58 on June 05, 2013, 02:14:06 pm
I'm not going to lie Tig, 9/10 times you open your mouth, I'm overwhelmed with the urge to put my foot in it.
Hicks58
Development
Posts: 5343
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #10 on:
May 16, 2012, 09:01:14 am »
I feel sorry for the poor bastards that have to go through every doctrine associating some form of proportional cost to the abilities while maintaining balance.
Logged
Quote from: brn4meplz on November 05, 2012, 10:45:05 am
I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
Quote from: Mysthalin on March 27, 2014, 04:57:09 pm
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #11 on:
May 16, 2012, 12:56:32 pm »
dudebro balance lead 2012.
Logged
tank130
Sugar Daddy
Posts: 8889
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #12 on:
May 16, 2012, 02:25:06 pm »
Quote from: Hicks58 on May 16, 2012, 09:01:14 am
I feel sorry for the poor bastards that have to go through every doctrine associating some form of proportional cost to the abilities while maintaining balance.
Actually, the job of doing that just became 10 times easier by implementing costs. We were going to pass the doctrines to the BT and request that they all be good worth while buffs, balanced across all factions, but with no way to balance them other then just inventing a balanced buff.
The doctrines have been out for about 2 years now and have never been balanced across all 4 factions. Some of the abilities completely suck or have been nerfed into uselessness. Now we can boost them back up or create even better ones, but not be limited by no balance currency.
Not every buff requires a cost. It only requires a cost if the buff is too effective for free. Nerfing the buff to be balanced "free" usually results in it being useless.
Logged
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #13 on:
May 16, 2012, 03:56:33 pm »
I'm glad to continue to be unsurprised that I am your loss you asscave mongering bastards
But ill never be a yes-man
glad to know that this is being thought about
Smokaz - pushing EIR around since 2009, not even honored member
«
Last Edit: May 16, 2012, 03:58:58 pm by Smokaz
»
Logged
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #14 on:
May 16, 2012, 04:18:00 pm »
88s UP needs more buffs.
Logged
EIRRMod
Administrator / Lead Developer
Posts: 11009
Re: An example of EIRR doing things right, agree or disagree?
«
Reply #15 on:
May 16, 2012, 06:21:28 pm »
Quote from: Smokaz on May 16, 2012, 03:56:33 pm
I'm glad to continue to be unsurprised that I am your loss you asscave mongering bastards
But ill never be a yes-man
glad to know that this is being thought about
Huh. I have no idea what you said.
Quote
Smokaz - pushing EIR around since 2009, not even honored member
You need a badge for that sheriff!
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
News & Introductions
-----------------------------
=> Updates & Announcements
=> EIR Boot Camp
===> In Other Languages
=====> In Chinese
=====> In German
=====> In Spanish
=====> In Polish
=====> In French
=====> In Norwegian
=> New Players
-----------------------------
EIR Main Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Tactics & Strategy
=> Balance & Design
=> Broadcasts & Replays
=> Projects & Mapping
=> Technical Support
===> Bug Reporting
-----------------------------
General Forums
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> Other Games
TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 ©
Bloc
Loading...