Ahnungsloser
Donator
 Posts: 1447
|
|
« on: June 22, 2012, 06:23:48 am » |
|
It says "Airborne Infantry, Airborne Riflemen, Rifleman" can build tank traps, barbed wire and sandbags". Haven't tested it complety, but it did not work on regular Riflemen. (Why is Airborne lagging so behind  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 9th Armoured Engineers |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2012, 07:58:11 am » |
|
cuz theyre op
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
Mister Schmidt
Lawmaker
 Posts: 5006
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2012, 10:19:25 am » |
|
Someone's never seen airborne before
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
"Seeing Bigdick in his full sado mask attire, David couldn't help but feel a tingle in his special place.."
|
|
|
| taco355
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2012, 12:39:27 pm » |
|
Someone's never seen airborne before
It tickles my tummy when i see airborne rushing my stummel, So i just drive backwards killing them until they run away again. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| 8thRifleRegiment
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2012, 02:04:26 pm » |
|
can i raid assault all over your mouth?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I will never forget the rage we enduced together  Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2012, 02:10:58 pm » |
|
they were OP and all allied playersr used to use them and pershing spam.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| MorkaandBorka
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2012, 03:18:27 pm » |
|
can i raid assault all over your mouth?
lol.................................... ..........................hot.....<3 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I'm really bad - Smokaz
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
 Posts: 7978
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2012, 04:23:38 pm » |
|
they were OP and all allied playersr used to use them and pershing spam.
How is this relevant to the doctrine not being complete? Or working. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 . . . . . . . . . . . |
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2012, 05:00:14 pm » |
|
How is this relevant to the doctrine not being complete? Or working.
Okay smart ass. I was merely repplying to someone saying that AB aren't OP and what groundfire said about wht they used to be, which is part of the reason they suck so bad which which btw answers this question (Why is Airborne lagging so behind ) so fucking read |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 22, 2012, 05:02:53 pm » |
|
Airborne isn't lagging behind in implementation because it "used to be OP" - but because a lot of what they have requires Luci to do coding - and as we're all aware he's been fairly busy with something else.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
Posts: 1447
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 23, 2012, 05:08:29 am » |
|
Cho-Cho, nice derail guys.
I just reported a none working doctrine unlock and the most talking about being OP - calm down gents.
There is a shitload of non-working stuff at the I would just like to see a complete Doctrine. With the Warmap and some better doctrine choices
we will see much more airborne player on our battlefield which do something else then recoilles-blobbing.
The Airborne itself can't defend themself against infantry which is better then a Volksgrenadier, and if they carry two recoilles-rifles they lose
much AI capability from their low AI potential. Use Pumas and these guys become fucking useless because the recoilles-rifles tempt to
phase trough a Puma.
Please read, their lagging behind in the doctrine part - This is a non-working doctrine report and I refer to it and nothing else.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 23, 2012, 09:11:12 am » |
|
Airborne isn't lagging behind in implementation because it "used to be OP" - but because a lot of what they have requires Luci to do coding - and as we're all aware he's been fairly busy with something else.
you have to think in long terms. if a doctrine ability was deemed to be OP it was taken out completely, all the t4's are new, some factions dont have that so thus because they were so strong their needed to be new doctrine abilities, it took a long time to make those and in that time Luci didnt have time to add the stuff needed for them tow ork at their max abilities so yes, because they were once too strong did it lead to it being screwed now. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tank130
Sugar Daddy
 Posts: 8889
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 23, 2012, 11:09:26 am » |
|
Completion and patching of Airborne doctrine is scheduled for July 13/14
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Geez, while Wind was banned I forgot that he is, in fact, totally insufferable
I'm not going to lie Tig, 9/10 times you open your mouth, I'm overwhelmed with the urge to put my foot in it.
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
Posts: 1447
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 23, 2012, 11:24:58 am » |
|
Completion and patching of Airborne doctrine is scheduled for July 13/14
Hope to see some fancy implementation from the SDT for this rework.  (Some people in this forum had some awesome ideas in the AB doctrine draft thread and hopefully some of them get implemented) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ahnungsloser
Donator
Posts: 1447
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2012, 04:28:00 pm » |
|
Completion and patching of Airborne doctrine is scheduled for July 13/14
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 08, 2012, 06:09:15 pm » |
|
lawl
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
|
