*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 27, 2024, 02:12:27 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: M-18 Balance  (Read 11690 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« on: August 09, 2012, 01:04:36 pm »

Yeah, don't see too many m10s anymore, so clearly the new m18 is better and the m10 is outclassed even with 100 more fual.

I feel like the m18 should still be faster but should have poor acceleration and deceleration much like the Marder for PE.

While the M10 is slower but can get going quicker, making it more of a skirmisher and taking that role away from the M-18

Thoughts?

AmPm?
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Ahnungsloser Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1447



« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2012, 01:11:30 pm »

I don't see any problem. Maybe the +0.3Penetration in the target table was to high, but overall it just changed the fact that the axis can't roll around with unsupported armour.

It has paper armour (lol even the Upgun Puma has a 160% chance to penetrate it - And it's one of the lower caliber guns) and when a US player
is dumb enough to charge into your frontline you anhilate 320FU.

Nobody uses the M10 because the M10 is less reliable compored to the higher cost of a M18. Why should you buy a tank which costs ~ -33%FU and ~ -25% MP when it bounces to often on thicker armour. I'd rather invest some bucks more into a unit to get a insurance for a reliable tank destroyer.
Logged

9th Armoured Engineers
8thRifleRegiment Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2210



« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2012, 01:14:41 pm »

with vet 2 the m18 is faster then a jeep, significantly faster, the m10 is once against heavily outclassed. The issue is that the price increase we gave the m18 doesnt mean a fucking thing when you get enough fuel for 5 in a company, which is the same amount as you could get before warmap retardo bonuses.
Logged


I will never forget the rage we enduced together

Ohh Good, AmPm can pay in Doubloons.
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2012, 01:18:01 pm »

yeah i saw like 2 m10s last game and it's the only m10s ive seen since the patch.
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2012, 01:29:25 pm »

I still don't know why it was changed in the first place.

M10 should have turned into basically a turreted Marder with a slow rotation rate.

Instead, the M18 turned into a Panther light.
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ahnungsloser Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1447



« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2012, 01:31:32 pm »

with vet 2 the m18 is faster then a jeep, significantly faster, the m10 is once against heavily outclassed. The issue is that the price increase we gave the m18 doesnt mean a fucking thing when you get enough fuel for 5 in a company, which is the same amount as you could get before warmap retardo bonuses.

Then fix the source of the cause instead of tweaking the symptom. And I'm sure it would fix other "problems" too.
Logged
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2012, 01:32:18 pm »

I would say that the M10 could just use a price reduction so that you have one cheap and one expensive tank destroyer. Also if we did like Tyminator wants to, m18 would be gobbled up by anything it ambushed with worse acceleration and speed.

Better yet, give the m18 100 more health and increase the price to something between the current price and 400.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 01:36:40 pm by Smokaz » Logged

SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma
SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits
SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Smokaz Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 11418



« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2012, 01:32:53 pm »

with vet 2 the m18 is faster then a jeep, significantly faster, the m10 is once against heavily outclassed. The issue is that the price increase we gave the m18 doesnt mean a fucking thing when you get enough fuel for 5 in a company, which is the same amount as you could get before warmap retardo bonuses.

you can't run 5 in your company normally, also I dont care what doctrine choices yiy are. this is not a good build. both infantry and armor have other vehicles they want other than pure hellcat spam.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 01:51:55 pm by Smokaz » Logged
Hicks58 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 5343



« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2012, 02:26:32 pm »

I would say that the M10 could just use a price reduction so that you have one cheap and one expensive tank destroyer. Also if we did like Tyminator wants to, m18 would be gobbled up by anything it ambushed with worse acceleration and speed.

Better yet, give the m18 100 more health and increase the price to something between the current price and 400.

FYI, M18 has 500 health as it stands.
Logged

I mean I know Obama was the first one in EiR to get a card. and tbfh the Race card is pretty OP. but Romney has the K.K.K., those guys seem to camo anywhere. So OP units from both sides.
At the end of the day, however, stormtroopers finally got the anal invasion with a cactus they have richly deserved for years.
hans Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3497



« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2012, 02:56:36 pm »

well, i use m10s if i want a good td for a low price. So if i decide for 6 m10s, its because the fill the td role good for its price. Personally i think that 6 or maybe 7 m10s are better then 5 m18s. True that m18 turned into beast with new patch. But u still have the options: lower price good td (m10), higher price, very good td (m18). Maybe the lack of m10s will change with the metagame change?

why do u want to change something with m10 price or whatever. Right now its good. If u lower the price, m10 will be maybe more often taken, but just because it has a better price cost ratio then.

PS: also with the looong cloak delay for hellcat, m10 is performing same role like the m18 now. If i remember when i used last time cloak... long ago. SO before i used hellcat like move see tank cloak shoot backup move see tank cloak shoot back. Now its like the m10 already does.
Logged



Also, bad analogy ground, My vegetables never pissed on my ego when I decided they defeated me and gave up on dessert.
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2012, 03:26:46 pm »

yeah i saw like 2 m10s last game and it's the only m10s ive seen since the patch.
*Raises hand* Guilty
Logged

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they've tried everything else."

Quote from: PonySlaystation
The officer is considerably better than a riflemen squad at carrying weapons. Officers have good accuracy so they will hit most targets.
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2012, 05:09:30 pm »

This is what i say.

Why would i choose a M10 when panther still bounce it often and in 3 shots the m10 is almost dead.

When i can get m18s which can take more hits, will penetrate very often. sure i can only afford 3.
Logged

You are welcome to your opinion.

You are also welcome to be wrong.
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #12 on: August 09, 2012, 05:22:06 pm »

i think if m10s cost slightly less it would be good.

but maybe it is just the meta, i rather use more m10s to take out p4s, but if im dealing with panthers or tigers i gotta take m18s.
Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #13 on: August 09, 2012, 06:11:35 pm »

i think if m10s cost slightly less it would be good.

but maybe it is just the meta, i rather use more m10s to take out p4s, but if im dealing with panthers or tigers i gotta take m18s.

Yeah but the m18 can still penetrate  P4s and below. I mean i dont see the whole problem.

I see p4s penetrate Pershings.
Logged
3rdCondor Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1536


« Reply #14 on: August 09, 2012, 06:12:17 pm »

How about implementing bikes with dual panzershreks?
Logged

No tits, but i will bake a cake then eat it in honour of Sir Condor The 3rd
fuck the pgren rifle, fucking dogshit weapon
My beautiful black pussy won
I2ay Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 626



« Reply #15 on: August 09, 2012, 07:30:19 pm »

Yeah but the m18 can still penetrate  P4s and below. I mean i dont see the whole problem.

I see p4s penetrate Pershings.
I've seen cromwells penetrate jagds, doesn't mean it happens a lot.
Logged



Spartan_Marine88 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4838



« Reply #16 on: August 09, 2012, 07:46:40 pm »

I've seen cromwells penetrate jagds, doesn't mean it happens a lot.

I have seen a bike kill a pershing and an pio kill a sherman too.
Logged

Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
nikomas Offline
Shameless Perv
*
Posts: 4286



« Reply #17 on: August 09, 2012, 07:47:16 pm »

I've seen cromwells penetrate jagds, doesn't mean it happens a lot.
I've seen a bike kill a comet, close enough

My favorite is still mp40 volks killing an M10, seen it several times, lol
« Last Edit: August 09, 2012, 07:54:51 pm by nikomas » Logged
aeroblade56 Offline
Development
*
Posts: 3871



« Reply #18 on: August 09, 2012, 11:15:57 pm »

I've seen cromwells penetrate jagds, doesn't mean it happens a lot.

you have a much higher chance of penetrating a pershing with p4 heatrounds

then you do a Cromwell with 25% penetration.

best one is when computer killed a Panther with grenades.
Logged
Scotzmen Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 2035


« Reply #19 on: August 10, 2012, 02:30:16 am »

Nha

MI Flares Killed a Churchill MK6

Beat that.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 36 queries.