Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« on: August 19, 2012, 07:26:35 am » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2012, 09:12:46 am » |
|
its like Mount & Blade but better.
I really dont think thats the case at the moment. Although the words "It has the potential to be better than M&B" are more fitting.
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt
|
|
|
PonySlaystation
|
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2012, 09:20:41 am » |
|
Why not just play m&b warband multiplayer?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2012, 09:48:51 am » |
|
Why not just play m&b warband multiplayer?
If thats to me than yeah, thats what im doing until War of the roses improves some more. Am I not aloud to criticize a new game or something? If thats to baine, well he wants to find a better game of the same type. Obviously we all want that. If we didnt we would all be playing ground control and doom right now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2012, 09:57:06 am » |
|
M&B is ok, but this looks more fun.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2012, 09:58:20 am » |
|
M&B is ok, but this looks more fun.
Have you even played War of the roses yet? I am asking because you put "looks"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Spartan_Marine88
|
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2012, 09:59:18 am » |
|
M&B is ok, but this looks more fun.
Sounds like someone didn't actually like M&B. War of the Roses is just shinier, not actually close to being better (yet)
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2012, 11:03:56 am » |
|
I didn't play WotR yet, that's why i put "looks".
I played M&B probably before you even knew about it :-O But as time goes by you want things to develop, and WotR looks like a good mix between M&B and the half life mod Age of Chivalry.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2012, 11:58:51 am » |
|
I didn't play WotR yet, that's why i put "looks".
Then perhaps in the OP you shouldn't state that "its like Mount & Blade but better." I played M&B probably before you even knew about it :-O But as time goes by you want things to develop, and WotR looks like a good mix between M&B and the half life mod Age of Chivalry.
I don't know how you knowing about M&B before I did is relevant, but I did play a bit of M&B in its really early days of pre-release, so I get to claim hipster status too. I too want the game to develop and for War of the roses to be better than M&B, but I wont jump the gun and say its better just because of the hype.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Poppi
|
« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2012, 12:00:58 pm » |
|
but M&b has all those other mechanics outside of combat
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2012, 12:11:43 pm » |
|
Then perhaps in the OP you shouldn't state that "its like Mount & Blade but better."I don't know how you knowing about M&B before I did is relevant, but I did play a bit of M&B in its really early days of pre-release, so I get to claim hipster status too.
I too want the game to develop and for War of the roses to be better than M&B, but I wont jump the gun and say its better just because of the hype.
Darksoldier you have the tendency to feel adressed when people don't adress you.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2012, 12:36:56 pm » |
|
Darksoldier you have the tendency to feel adressed when people don't adress you.
I dont see how thats relevent lol, but please explain.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2012, 01:33:24 pm » |
|
Yes, it was a respone to Spartan.
I always feel big when making dumbass statements, but that was probably not one of them :-O
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DarkSoldierX
|
« Reply #14 on: August 19, 2012, 02:34:06 pm » |
|
Just played a few more games of War of roses, 30 man games still lag far more than 140 man games on M&B. Combat still doesnt feel fluid. You frequently walk through enemies and end up missing because your inside of him. I have yet to understand the armour rating system though. Sometimes I get nice 70+ dmg hits. Sometimes I get shity 10~20 dmg hits against the exact same guy. Sometimes I do absolutely no damage. Not sure if its influenced by speed like M&B, because when I see a enemy running towards me and me towards him and I swing I still sometimes I still do little damage. Blocking apears to be near useless. Blocking is required in M&B and in here it seems you get away with spamming quite easily, and that most people hardly ever block at all.
Although I must praise the customization system. Different fighting styles, different blade materials, different edges for the blade, ect are all pretty nice. Just need the devs to work on that netcode and make the combat much better.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
« Reply #15 on: August 19, 2012, 06:02:03 pm » |
|
Its the COD variant of M&B.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves Nevergetsputonlistguy767
|
|
|
|