SophiaT1991
|
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2012, 12:02:05 pm » |
|
No, the majority of players do not agree with you. You want emplacements? go play Opposing Fronts.
You might not feel the same, but brits are just a modified US right now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #21 on: September 08, 2012, 12:26:23 pm » |
|
Tank is right, no phase armour...
Any time phase armour comes into play, stupid shit happens. see: puma
|
|
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
SophiaT1991
|
« Reply #22 on: September 08, 2012, 01:17:58 pm » |
|
cba making long post, will post ideas:
Better pathing, dont know how you do it, but its so shit it doesnt need explained.
IHT, AC and maybe SC get medium crush, give them more of an assault feeling, and instead of trying to get between chairs and gravestones they just knock them over. Maybe that would also sort out the pathing issues?
Change how they repair. Either let pe have old repair system where pgrens can do it for free, make the inf have repair kits to use on vehicle they want or let vehicles move and shoot like normal while repairing.
Inf to get old armour back and a pop decrease to 4. Buff G43's.
All ideas combined would be pro.
Will maybe make long post with reasoning later.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #23 on: September 08, 2012, 01:24:19 pm » |
|
Having the infantry buy repair kits to then use on vehicles would be pretty nice.
As would medium crush....no more getting stopped by stupid shit.
|
|
|
Logged
|
. . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #24 on: September 08, 2012, 02:39:25 pm » |
|
Having the infantry buy repair kits to then use on vehicles would be pretty nice.
actually, that wouldnt' be a bad idea, would help them retain their original function
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!" "I have proof!" "Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
tank130
Sugar Daddy
Posts: 8889
|
« Reply #25 on: September 08, 2012, 02:47:43 pm » |
|
Medium crush would solve a shit load of problems imo. Great idea......
Should try just that in next patch and see how it plays out. Then make more small changes as needed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Geez, while Wind was banned I forgot that he is, in fact, totally insufferable
I'm not going to lie Tig, 9/10 times you open your mouth, I'm overwhelmed with the urge to put my foot in it.
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #26 on: September 08, 2012, 03:27:21 pm » |
|
Medium crush would solve a shit load of problems imo. Great idea......
Should try just that in next patch and see how it plays out. Then make more small changes as needed.
what crush do other lv's and similar have? (puma, t-17, stag, m8, halftracks)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #27 on: September 08, 2012, 03:28:04 pm » |
|
Light, except for the Stuart.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SophiaT1991
|
« Reply #28 on: September 08, 2012, 03:41:01 pm » |
|
See, I can bring forward good ideas when I want to
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #29 on: September 08, 2012, 09:45:16 pm » |
|
Light, except for the Stuart.
do they have the same pathing issues?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #30 on: September 09, 2012, 12:05:57 am » |
|
Nope.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #31 on: September 09, 2012, 09:14:39 am » |
|
Nope.
then why do PE vehicles have a pathing issue then if they have light crush as well? Giving them med crush may not even fix it then.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SophiaT1991
|
« Reply #32 on: September 09, 2012, 09:35:46 am » |
|
then why do PE vehicles have a pathing issue then if they have light crush as well? Giving them med crush may not even fix it then.
Think he meant stuarts dont have the pathing issues.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Uglysori
EIR Veteran Posts: 301
The very best player of one of the four factions.
|
« Reply #33 on: September 09, 2012, 02:43:10 pm » |
|
Sooo Marders still fail at pathing even with medium crush.... not sure if this is necessarily going to be solving pathing issues for PE HTs.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SophiaT1991
|
« Reply #34 on: September 09, 2012, 03:13:27 pm » |
|
Does each unit have individual pathing files? If so, just replace with a shermans, never have problems with them.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #35 on: September 09, 2012, 03:24:35 pm » |
|
Part of their pathing issues is the fact that they have a rather big speed impediment when driving through light/ heavy cover, it really screws them up as they are all about speed and mobility. However, they most likely will address that.
then it's not the crush but rather their turning, accel and decel since like Ugly said Marders have med crush and still have issues. dont take it that i dont want ot give them med crush but would rather make sure that it really is the issue before going forward and having to figure it all out again
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokaz
Honoured Member
Posts: 11418
|
« Reply #36 on: September 09, 2012, 05:04:24 pm » |
|
Marders are good enough already.
|
|
|
Logged
|
SlippedHerTheBigOne: big penis puma SlippedHerTheBigOne: and i have no repairkits SlippedHerTheBigOne: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
aeroblade56
Development
Posts: 3871
|
« Reply #37 on: September 09, 2012, 09:53:39 pm » |
|
50mm with APCR pack a hell of a punch.
Just dont get them to close
|
|
|
Logged
|
You are welcome to your opinion.
You are also welcome to be wrong.
|
|
|
SophiaT1991
|
« Reply #38 on: September 10, 2012, 12:47:54 am » |
|
Doctrine selections should not be included into any balance discussion based purely on a faction.
And when I think about it, wehr ht, 50mm ht and muni ht don't have as many patching issues.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TheVolskinator
Administrator / Lead Developer
Posts: 3012
|
« Reply #39 on: September 10, 2012, 11:30:05 am » |
|
Muni HT OP!
Ask nikomas.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|