*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 17, 2024, 09:33:39 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: xp gain?  (Read 4697 times)
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
gungunx Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 137


« on: March 26, 2008, 06:18:30 am »

Isn't it to high? Allies got vets 3 and 2 already after a few days. What's the point if you can gain a vet 2 after a few battles. Shouldn't you gain vets on a longer basis , like vet 1 after 4-5 battles.  Vet 3 should be rare , you see one and "oh wow a vet3" right now it's " vet 3 spam gogogogo"
Logged
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18379


« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2008, 06:20:59 am »

What are you on about?
Only allied infantry got 2x slower veterancy gain, the majority of the allied players right now have vet 1, vet 2 riflemen at most.

Are you referring to my vet 3 sniper? Tongue
Mind you, it played 5 games in which it killed an average of 30 infantry...

I would agree though overall, the vet 2 & 3 requirements for some units should be higher.
(I'm thinking certain tanks, elite infantry, etc)
Logged
gungunx Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 137


« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2008, 06:25:51 am »

i'm talking about axis also not only allies


it would give a more real like battle type where you get a few vets3 and you know that they had to fight 20 battles in order to get that vet 3 so you are like" ok im not gonna rush them because i will loose my vet3" right now you can just spam vet 2 and 3 and you are not afraid even if you loose them because you know you can spam some more in the next 5 battles. People would have to care about their troops = less zomgwtfrush . Instead there would be a more tactical game. it would be better for the new players also because those with vets would had to think twice to go with their troops against vet 0 because vets 0 don't loose anything and those with vets would
« Last Edit: March 26, 2008, 06:29:36 am by gungunx » Logged
Avalanche Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 389


« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2008, 06:28:14 am »

also allies needs to get their vet 1 slower
or remove the 0.8 received accuracy from their vet1

my sniper missed 3 times at long range vs allies sniper when counter sniping

sniper should have perfect accuracy at long range, except short range which it has 0.75 accuracy
Logged
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18379


« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2008, 06:34:10 am »

They're not touching vCoH stats.
Logged
Avalanche Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 389


« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2008, 07:18:40 am »

i mean sniper were design to have perfect accuracy, they have 1 accuracy for long and medium distance by default, and 0.75 for short.

but allies vet1 completly screws this rule, making axis sniper 0.8 accuracy for long and medium, and 0.6 for short
Logged
Prydefalcn Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 164


« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2008, 10:32:02 am »

My allied snipers have missed a ranged countersnipe before.
Logged

Prydefalcn - Axis
CommanderNewbie - Allied
salan
Guest
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2008, 10:37:59 am »

My allied snipers have missed a ranged countersnipe before.

i missed two in a row yesterday, sucked to be me after the second one missed Sad
Logged
Avalanche Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 389


« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2008, 11:31:20 am »

sniper will miss another 50% if the other sniper is moving
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.089 seconds with 36 queries.