CaptainAmerica
|
|
« on: December 07, 2008, 10:21:18 am » |
|
Hey guys, Louis and I were inspired by Akrandas to make a motion to balance the Tier4s out a bit to make the game more playable.
The following changes we came up with are things we personally considered problematic and potentially game ruining for players on both sides.
I know this will kick up a massive s***storm by people who argue "but axis get X OR but Allies get Y". This thread is not about the advantages the one side has and therefore balance overall. This post is PURELY ABOUT TIER 4 BALANCE ISSUES.
It would be nice if people merely posted
A) AGREED
B) DISAGREE
Then we could gather a consensus and NOT A DEBATE.
Allies-
Infantry
T4 Artilley: take off the decreased time (back to 3 seconds)
Tank Reapers: Decrease effects to 25%, extend effect to Bazookas (Stickies maybe?)
Airborne
Air Supririorty: Decrease uses of all 3 offmaps by 1
Raid Assault: Reduce HP bonus
Axis
Terror
Subversion: Reduce sabotage effect to 1
Defensive
Ominscience: Decrease to "Increase sight range by 15%"
Tenacious Faith: Decrease cost to 10%
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| BradAnderson
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2008, 10:23:07 am » |
|
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Stuart750
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2008, 10:29:01 am » |
|
All Axis Companies: Eliminate all doctrine abilities and Resource bonuses, and award stickers and high-fives instead. I agree. Stuart is always right. Listen to him.
As do I. As an Australian fellow, myself, (being Australian) I declare my allegiance to Stuart on behalf of all Oceaniac people, including Akranadas.
All Hail!
Surrender to Stuart, he is our supreme king, who will not lead us into traps and follies alike!
I am very mysterious. I have a cloak. I cast my completely legitimate and unfraudulent vote for Stuart.
Following him is certainly NOT a trap! If you don't listen to him, kill-your-self!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 07, 2008, 10:36:37 am by Stuart750 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
 Posts: 18377
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2008, 10:30:14 am » |
|
Agreed on the concept, disagreed on the actual suggested changes.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CommanderNewbie
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2008, 10:33:06 am » |
|
I disagree, because I don't believe this is how it should be done.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
CommanderNewbie - Allied
Prydefalcn - Axis
|
|
|
| 31stPzGren
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2008, 10:34:43 am » |
|
Agreed on the concept, disagreed on the actual suggested changes.
Agree. Figures require tweaking. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2008, 10:36:03 am » |
|
I share what unknown feels. Let's make a discussion thread.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| donnieDark
|
|
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2008, 10:40:11 am » |
|
This is utter crap. You trying to take away the only thing that makes infantry company useful and adjust axis doctrines that arent that game shattering.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2008, 10:52:04 am » |
|
This is utter crap. You trying to take away the only thing that makes infantry company useful and adjust axis doctrines that arent that game shattering.
i made a discussion thread, respect their wishes. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| UnLimiTeD2
|
|
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2008, 10:53:19 am » |
|
Disagreed along the line.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CaptainAxis
|
|
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2008, 11:10:06 am » |
|
Disagreed Along the Line?
Er? What does that mean?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| minehold
|
|
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2008, 11:12:14 am » |
|
i dont agree with tenacious faith, it is balanced, the allies can get 15% less cost on all infantry at a t3, and the price of cps tenacious faith costs and its a t4 so it should be 35%
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 07, 2008, 11:14:41 am by minehold »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CaptainAxis
|
|
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2008, 11:14:15 am » |
|
Disagree or Agree.
If you want to discuss, go to Discussion.
This post is to acknowledge that the above stated doctrine abilities are in need of change. Figures and details at this point are merely provisional.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Mysthalin_Armor
|
|
« Reply #13 on: December 07, 2008, 01:21:59 pm » |
|
Retardedness unlimited in your proposals.
Epic Disagree
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Killer344
The Inquisitor
 Posts: 6904
|
|
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2008, 03:42:58 pm » |
|
Disagree.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
|
|
|
| winisez
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 07, 2008, 05:00:17 pm » |
|
um...agree on the concepts, numbers need fixing.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| slowzo
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 07, 2008, 06:00:14 pm » |
|
im pretty sure this has already been addressed by a higher power.
disagree
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| winisez
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 07, 2008, 06:51:28 pm » |
|
how so? most of us have heard nothing or this, or seen evidence of it, or am i just ignorant?
i thought the eirmod guy was just helping us keep the website together and such. he has no obligation to do anything, or that's what i thought. its all his/her prerogative.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Unkn0wn
No longer retired
Posts: 18377
|
|
« Reply #18 on: December 07, 2008, 07:16:04 pm » |
|
No, he's already stated the doctrine system will be completely redone.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| mattrin
|
|
« Reply #19 on: December 07, 2008, 07:48:59 pm » |
|
agreedisagree
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
