What was the argument you guys brought in the 88 thread about the same thing?
Oh yeah right, what about allies defend?
I was commenting on the fact that someone said they need to be vulnerable while being set up and i mearly just said they are.
Well it does more damage, but it's a different gun; the thing is, it has nearly the same annoyance factor
And that's a T4 you are talking about, i would wait before you already start whining in advance, especially since only 4 or 5 PE guys have a 88 and what are the odds that everyone takes that as T4? (No please, no smart ass answer to this rhethorical question)
They both cost the same in mp basically and the 88 just costs more fuel. Also, 88's are great vs everything but infantry, mortar pits only affect other infantry so basically, 88's are a bigger game changer than mortar pits are.
And, omg, did you not notice the /sarcasm on the end of that? God, i pointed out that i was using sarcasm and you completely missed that lol thats just sad.
Funny how when Axis talk about Mortar pits, it is just pissed off people who got pwned by that unit and now want to flame about it in the forum, while when allies come here and do the same with the 88, it must be the real pro guys who know how to balance
The person who created the thread was upset cuz his strategy was being beat by mortar pits. I brought up the 88 thread, even though i won 5 out of the last 6 games i played against 88's, BIG difference. I can beat it, he's having trouble against it. I brought up the 88 because of game-play and the frequency of 88's i've been seeing, this is one guy with a problem against mortar pits because it directly counters HIS mortar strategy. HUGE difference in arguments.
