*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 09, 2025, 02:29:27 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[Today at 01:41:15 pm]

[Today at 01:40:51 pm]

[Today at 11:41:52 am]

[Today at 09:46:18 am]

[Today at 07:51:21 am]

[Today at 06:00:42 am]

[Today at 04:11:37 am]

[Today at 12:25:35 am]

[Yesterday at 10:35:26 pm]

[September 06, 2025, 04:22:48 pm]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Should the 2inch Mortar be changed?  (Read 1775 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Mukip Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 450



« on: February 27, 2010, 09:16:14 pm »

Why do the Commonwealth have the worst mortar in the game?  It's not in-keeping with the rest of the faction's units, which are typically good but expensive.  They often excel at one role.  The 2inch Mortar Team bucks the trend by being cheap and shit.  Even the Vickers MG is has the suppression boosting ability to make it stand out.

Is it because the Brits do not have a mobile mortar in vCoH, and so they are punished with a poor mortar as a replacement for the static mortar pit?  To make the Commando Mortar relatively attractive?  To take into account supercharged rounds?

This is not a balance thread, it's more a question of the intent behind the 2inch mortar.  I think it would be in-keeping with the faction design to have a good but expensive mortar instead.  Perhaps the range could be inbetween the American and Wehr mortar. 

It might be necessary to restrict supercharged rounds to the mortar pit or reduce the benefit of supercharged rounds, but I think a unit should do it's job properly before buffs not afterwards.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.052 seconds with 35 queries.