*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 24, 2024, 04:31:29 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[September 06, 2024, 11:58:09 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]

[December 25, 2022, 11:36:26 am]
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 0.7.9N  (Read 15212 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
PonySlaystation Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 4136



« Reply #40 on: April 24, 2011, 02:55:41 pm »

It's like a turret-less churchill with a FF gun!

Good idea, we should implement a Churchill with 17pdr gun.
Logged

Sharks are not monsters Henley, they are cute, cuddly and misunderstood. They love humans. sometimes they love TOO much. They love people so much that sometimes their kisses separate people into two flailing pieces which are consumed by other sharks in a frenzy of peace and joy.
LeoPhone Offline
Honoured Member
*
Posts: 0


« Reply #41 on: April 24, 2011, 03:03:56 pm »

This needs to be changed, that was absolutely retarded! I sat there and pounded your 17 for a good minute before it actually died, and I was hitting it from behind most of the time, it took so long to kill that I bet you could of rolled a fresh 17 and killed me by the time I killed it.

You just have experienced how worthless the ostwind is vs units in heavy cover. the cover modifiers on the ostwind vs heavy cover is much worse compared to other vehicles.
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #42 on: April 24, 2011, 03:04:36 pm »

Also, 17 is about a million times stronger than an 88, which makes NO sense! Once again T1!!!

Please honor the amount of exaggeration I've put in my posts.

I would totally take a 17 over an 88 at this point, larger crew, harder to kill crew, for less range, AND i still get to field a bunch of churchills?! Fuck I'm getting off my US account and going back to UK  Grin
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
CrazyWR Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 3616


« Reply #43 on: April 24, 2011, 04:03:01 pm »

at ranges you can't do anything about.


THIS.  FFS.
Logged

1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies

RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #44 on: April 24, 2011, 04:39:48 pm »

Calm down guys! Calm down!!

Move it up a tier.
Logged


Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves

Nevergetsputonlistguy767
Tymathee Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 9741



« Reply #45 on: April 24, 2011, 06:35:00 pm »

You were complaining that the 17 is not as good.

Let us compare.

17pdr = better penetration and range with APDS, t1 unlock includes other options

PaK40 = better damage, worse pen, worse range compared to APDS, T3 unlock with LeIG which kinda sucks.

17pdr is also in an EPIC doctrine, that allows you to spam tough armor and flame thrower Sappers all day + the best ATG currently in the game (pak 40 does less DPS than a PaK 38 for better pen, 17pdr counters the one thing axis tanks have going for them, tough armor).

17pdr also has units that allow you to disable tanks (Bren button infantry/carrier) meaning that the enemy cannot rush or flank you without threat, unlike the PaK (lol schreks vs Churchills).

The fact is, the 17pdr is better at it's job, while tying into the doctrine at a much stronger level than the PaK 40 which doesn't do any better than a PaK 38 vs most targets and is significantly worse vs Light Vehicles.

better penetration? they penetrate everything but heavy vehicles in one hit. I"ve never seen a 40 bounce dude, i've seen 'em miss plenty times but bounce lol who cares about penetration and the +5 rage on apds means nothing, it's a click ability if u actually get the chance to use the +5 range when u click it. It's use is not in kiting but when a tank is going away. and the leig is awesome at least to me, maybe u just need to l2pleig.

and i never said teh 17 is completely useles or i've never used it or at all, i just dont like it, and when i've played against it i never had an issue with it, even with my blitz. It fires, i back off and mortar/arty it or rush infantry, or flank ti as it has really slow turn. The vulnerabilities for me outweigh the benefits. Now, i'll keep one or two in my engineer coy just in case a heavy tank shows up and theres not much to kill it on the field, otherwise forget it.
Logged

"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"

Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #46 on: April 24, 2011, 07:23:01 pm »

Why is Tym always in an argument.
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #47 on: April 24, 2011, 09:35:33 pm »

The fun part, is why is it that Tym can never make an argument that holds water?
Logged


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
panzerman Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 689


« Reply #48 on: April 24, 2011, 09:43:49 pm »

Use a bucket that Holds water
Logged
Demon767 Offline
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran
Posts: 6190



« Reply #49 on: April 24, 2011, 09:44:10 pm »

Well, atleast he's got chicken  Grin
Logged
AmPM Offline
Community Mapper
*
Posts: 7978



« Reply #50 on: April 24, 2011, 09:57:09 pm »

He could use a bucket, but its full of KFC.
Logged
RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #51 on: April 24, 2011, 10:07:29 pm »

I do think 17 pounders are missing their "hold water" button.

Sorry couldn't resist.  Grin
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.063 seconds with 37 queries.