Its great that you are, but it leaves infantry doctrine in a pretty sorry state--they get none of the (honestly great) buffs that youre suggesting for AB. Infantry is supposed to be inf centric (derp), but it has no ingenious buffs such as these
.
If inf and armor were re vamped with equally power buffs, or some of what you suggesting going to them and new buffs being applied to AB, along with this going in, id be fine.
Kind of agree, but also kind of sad to say "ya i cant make something that makes sense,b/c the crappy docs will become more obvious crap"
i think AB doc should focus on more AB units. Like perhaps lose the glider riflemen. Focus on AB only, give more options to beef them up. Grease Guns, grenades, RR buffs, cloaking. Stuff that makes you want to use AB. Maybe lose AB sniper. Ya AWESOME unit. But why AB snipers?
Looking at the current AB doc some stuff is almost laughable. Some T3s belong as T1, and a bad T1 at that. If AB is tough or fine as is, i guess its b/c of troops themselves not the doc. If you getting your ass kicked by a AB player, willing to bet you will still get your ass kicked by a AB player who has no advantages bought.
I think Inf doc should focus on main force. Add better buffs to LV vehicles like Half track and quad. Why does armor get HT buff to inf recharge rate?
I argued before the only true unique benefit to Inf is the +1 to bar. If you dont choose that i can still choose any doc, like armor, roll with HVAP tanks, and still have tons of inf w/bars b/c for some reason vehicles dont eat up enough resources as they should be. So i can run inf tactics with any doc. I think Inf too needs to be relooked at so it can get some individuality.
