*

Account

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 27, 2024, 03:39:44 am

Login with username, password and session length

Resources

Recent posts

[November 01, 2024, 12:46:37 pm]

[October 05, 2024, 07:29:20 am]

[September 05, 2024, 01:54:13 pm]

[July 16, 2024, 11:30:34 pm]

[June 22, 2024, 06:49:40 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:13:38 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:12:54 am]

[March 08, 2024, 12:09:37 am]

[December 30, 2023, 08:00:58 pm]

[February 04, 2023, 11:46:41 am]
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Bren carrier  (Read 2470 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
OrdobalticusTLS Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 46


« on: March 20, 2009, 01:28:39 am »

I would like to open discussion on basic (non upgraded) bren carrier.

It has 4 pop cost, while all other transporters have only 3. I doubt anyone will argue that it is the weakest transporter hull-wise, weapon-wise, transport capacity-wise also it provides the least protection for its passengers.

In addition it is way overpriced in recources 220 manpower and 35 fuel. Definately not worth it.

So that is why this is one of the least popular units of british forces. In order to make it viable a change has to be made.
Logged

spinn72 Offline
EIR Veteran
Posts: 1802



« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2009, 02:26:23 am »

A Speed boost would definitely make it worthwhile.  It's only meant to be used for Infantry transport but i'd like the speed of it to be somewhere between an Infantry Halftrack and a Jeep, then it would be at least a decent scout or transport and worth it's money.

Or else reduce the cost quite a bit, probably at least 10 off fuel.
Logged
Mysthalin Offline
Tired King of Stats
*
Posts: 9028


« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2009, 02:42:46 am »

A 10 off fuel cost would mean it still costs 10 more MP than an IHT does...
The bren carrier needs to cost at most 40 MP more and 5 fuel more than a Jeep does(150 MP and 15 fuel) with a popcap cost of 3 - then it would actually be somewhat worth it. No changes to MMG carrier, though ^^.
Logged

RikiRude Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 4376



« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2009, 08:20:11 pm »

A 10 off fuel cost would mean it still costs 10 more MP than an IHT does...
The bren carrier needs to cost at most 40 MP more and 5 fuel more than a Jeep does(150 MP and 15 fuel) with a popcap cost of 3 - then it would actually be somewhat worth it. No changes to MMG carrier, though ^^.

I actually think this price balance is pretty on the money, I don't see anyone field these, and if I did, I'd call them crazy!
Logged



Quote from: Killer344
Killer344: "Repent: sory no joke i just had savage diorea"
... or a fat ass cock sucking churchill being stupid
Malevolence Offline
Donator
*
Posts: 1871



« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2009, 09:05:31 pm »

Regular bren carrier needs a buff. I bought one in my brit army to parade my lieutenant around in because I had extra money, but otherwise they're pointless.
Logged

Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1:

Quote from: Akranadas
Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance.

Quote from: Akranadas
We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it.
skyblazer Offline
EIR Regular
Posts: 36


« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2009, 04:44:39 am »

I've done rangers in bren carrier combo's before that worked semi well depending on what u were going after. If the bren had more speed to it it would be a much more effective tactic
Logged
Unkn0wn Offline
No longer retired
*
Posts: 18379


« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2009, 05:55:35 am »

Don't worry, we're on it!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

TinyPortal v1.0 beta 4 © Bloc
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.9 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 36 queries.