And I already posted my example where ATGs backed up by tanks and rangers/airborne and rifles were useless against a supported jadg
Yeah, and I can just ignore it, you know why? Because it is simply
wrong. It's like saying the sky is not blue.
The theorycrafting you do here is simply way too much. You always set up your scenarios in favour of the jagd.
I tell you to keep sticky support with your At gun and you simply place an ostwind behind the Jagd. So that basically means I am allowed to do that aswell. Well what do you think would happen if the ostwind that magically appeared behind the jagdpanther would have been killed by, lets say a 10% hp m18 that was hiding in some corner.
What im trying to say, supported
Anti tank guns will always be superior to supported tanks unless you are getting outplayed. Claiming you need tank reapers to beat them is simply wrong, it just makes it easier for people who don't want to think.
