Spartan_Marine88
|
|
« Reply #40 on: December 01, 2010, 03:21:48 pm » |
|
And again you are not reading what I'm saying. I've said it twice already, three times now - I UNDERSTAND HOW DOCTRINE SPECIALIZATIONS AND DOCTRINE UNLOCKS WORK PERFECTLY. Will caps get it through this time? We'll see.
Doctrine specializations are not passive abilities. Even if they were, by the twisted meaning you'd be using doctrine unlocks would be too, because COST has nothing to do with if something is PASSIVE.
(PS If you are fluent in English and have to look up either passive or ability in a dictionary, kill yourself)
Passive - something thats always there that you don't have to pay for unlock - something new that needs to be payed for |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Yes that's me, the special snowflake.
|
|
|
Artekas
Donator
 Posts: 784
|
|
« Reply #41 on: December 01, 2010, 03:23:54 pm » |
|
Now you're just making definitions up, if you really need to look up what passive means, I can guarantee you there will be no mention of "that you don't have to pay for" or anything resembling a cost.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #42 on: December 01, 2010, 03:24:24 pm » |
|
Yep, you are essentially complaining about the choice of words we used to describe the 2 doctrine tables. Honestly we have bigger fish to fry than to care about people complaining about this kind of stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
 |
|
|
| NightRain
|
|
« Reply #43 on: December 01, 2010, 03:25:05 pm » |
|
It is still better tier 1 than +3 m more detection for all vehicles, or -10% more recieved accuracy. Hell its better than some Blitzkrieg's tier 2s. Free MG on a Sherman armored flammenwerfer that now ensures that escape is futile as it can suppress and effectively cut down infantry.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because a forum post should be like a woman's skirt. Long enough to cover the subject material, but short enough to keep things interesting.
 |
|
|
Artekas
Donator
Posts: 784
|
|
« Reply #44 on: December 01, 2010, 03:26:48 pm » |
|
If you have bigger fish to fry, I wonder why you spent 40 minutes trying to argue it into your favour...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #45 on: December 01, 2010, 03:28:25 pm » |
|
I'm not arguing. I'm just trying to explain facts to you.
And to get back ontopic yes Nightrain, we'll look what we can do about it. It honestly seems to be really out of place as a T1 ability.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Artekas
Donator
Posts: 784
|
|
« Reply #46 on: December 01, 2010, 03:29:42 pm » |
|
And by explaining facts you mean trying to justify why you call doctrine specializations something that they're not, and in the end giving up because you know that your choice of wording was completely wrong.
tbh I think this is quite funny, I have time to kill so it doesn't matter to me but apparently you have bigger fish to fry, yet you spend all this time desperately trying to defend the fact that your wording was bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Killer344
The Inquisitor
 Posts: 6904
|
|
« Reply #47 on: December 01, 2010, 03:31:01 pm » |
|
ffs, so much drama for semantics.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I get shot and it's a gay medic fixing me up, he's not gonna be fondling my balls while he does it. You can't patch a chest wound and suck a cock at the same time.
|
|
|
Artekas
Donator
Posts: 784
|
|
« Reply #48 on: December 01, 2010, 03:31:37 pm » |
|
It's not really drama so much as bantering. (more semantics  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Killer344
The Inquisitor
Posts: 6904
|
|
« Reply #49 on: December 01, 2010, 03:32:38 pm » |
|
/face
Then you qq about pointless posts on the balance forum, maybe you should try helping instead of throwing more wood into the fire.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #50 on: December 01, 2010, 03:32:51 pm » |
|
We could care less to be honest, everybody who got into the mod understands how this system works. If you want to keep complaining about that talk to the boss all the way up there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Artekas
Donator
Posts: 784
|
|
« Reply #51 on: December 01, 2010, 03:35:32 pm » |
|
Killer, there is no balance discussion going on here. It is unanimously agreed that this is a ridiculous t1 and that it will be changed. That's not quite the same as shitting everything up with ad hominem in a balance argument.
EliteGren, now you're just trolling obviously. After "giving up" on the argument earlier in and admitting that you were wrong about the wording, you now just disregard everything I've been saying and say I'm "complaining about the system" when I'm picking on your shitty choice of words, using the term passive ability to describe something that is not a passive ability, which is retarded.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Killer344
The Inquisitor
Posts: 6904
|
|
« Reply #52 on: December 01, 2010, 03:38:11 pm » |
|
We're done here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #53 on: December 01, 2010, 03:40:31 pm » |
|
Aww Party pooper ;(
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
