Raio
|
« on: June 28, 2009, 06:41:31 am » |
|
Can i ask DEVs to add this ability ?
If anybody has the reson why NOT, post it. thx
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
Posts: 3713
|
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2009, 06:42:25 am » |
|
Make it a T4 in royal engineers.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Raio
|
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2009, 06:45:58 am » |
|
Make it a T4 in royal engineers.
not bad idea, but it seem all axis and Us engineers got this ability w/o t4s. Why 2 restrict brits.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Guderian
|
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2009, 06:47:18 am » |
|
Hmm would be fun if we could do 'tank ditches' That considerably slow down tanks (friendlies to) and make them good targets
|
|
|
Logged
|
Eir customer support staff.
|
|
|
Raio
|
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2009, 06:52:01 am » |
|
Gude, stay on topic pls.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mukip
|
« Reply #5 on: June 28, 2009, 06:58:52 am » |
|
Make it a T4 in royal engineers. I hope that was a comedy post. Perhaps they could add it to the Royal Engineers T1 doctrine that allow Tommies to build wire and sandbags, it would additionally let Sappers build tank traps. Alternatively, just let sappers build tank traps full stop.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Armfelt
|
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2009, 06:59:26 am » |
|
As I suggested in a earlier topic. Why not add it as a T1 Royal Engineer, That would be that when tommies can lay wire and build sandbags sappers would get the TT or roadblock ability. IMO as T4 ability it would right out suck... The scenario "woohoo, brits unlocks TT, when germans get german steel and other imba abilities" Hehe, Mukip we thought the same.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Well opinions are like assholes, everybody has one."
|
|
|
spinn72
|
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2009, 07:05:37 am » |
|
Add it to T1 royal Engineers. IMO the doctrine should be about:
Sappers + extra abilities Emplacements (the fact you actually get them) Churchills + a few upgrades Upgrades for Existing British tanks + better health/armour
Tank Traps are needed for brits.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Guderian
|
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2009, 07:07:09 am » |
|
Gude, stay on topic pls.
Ye well i mean it as a ''tank trap '' But to avoid mirroring.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Raio
|
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2009, 07:11:10 am » |
|
"same" as US Inf. t2(?). Not bad idea, but im talkin about sappers only.
just litlb bit more combinating 4 brits (but not only doctrinable)
|
|
« Last Edit: June 28, 2009, 09:44:24 am by Raio »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Guderian
|
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2009, 09:17:39 am » |
|
Well how should the tank traps look like? Like us? That would be dull frankly
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Armfelt
|
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2009, 09:42:17 am » |
|
well does´nt matter much for me how the tank obstacle looks like, as long as the brits in some form gets them. :]
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
acker
|
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2009, 09:47:35 am » |
|
A row of tiny kittens. No tank commander would ever be able to run over a kitten.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tankspirit666
|
« Reply #13 on: June 28, 2009, 09:53:10 am » |
|
LEts all make the uniform army where every army can what the other armies are able also.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Raio
|
« Reply #14 on: June 28, 2009, 10:51:37 am » |
|
sure tankspirit, sure.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Armfelt
|
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2009, 11:36:32 am » |
|
LEts all make the uniform army where every army can what the other armies are able also.
Ye i wanna see Cromwell with P4 stats and the " King Churchill" >:-) Make it a "King Croc churchill" instead >:-D
|
|
« Last Edit: June 28, 2009, 11:44:21 am by Armfelt »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Armfelt
|
« Reply #17 on: June 28, 2009, 11:47:42 am » |
|
Cool :] Could have tiger hp and firefly cannon? Btw, any Dev. opinion about a British Tank obstacle? :]
|
|
« Last Edit: June 28, 2009, 11:51:23 am by Armfelt »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Piotrskivich
|
« Reply #18 on: June 28, 2009, 11:50:41 am » |
|
And while your at it give tommies and pzgrens bags and wire.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
« Reply #19 on: June 28, 2009, 11:53:47 am » |
|
dont' sappers in vcoh get these abilities without having to add it in as docs? Why should we have to pay PP for it? Just put it on the sappers...
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!" "I have proof!" "Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
|