AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #20 on: July 03, 2009, 02:06:52 am » |
|
So you would be happy with BAR Rifles being renamed Support Rifle Section and be a different choice thats limited to 4?
Or Bazooka Rifles being Anti Tank Section and limited?
Just give em a new skin and call it done?
|
|
|
Logged
|
. . . . . . . . . . .
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #21 on: July 03, 2009, 02:09:14 am » |
|
Cut the crap AMPM, you always do this.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Let's talk about PIATs in a car.
|
|
|
Schultz
|
« Reply #22 on: July 03, 2009, 02:15:25 am » |
|
Yeah indeed cut the crap, oh wee take the exact same unit in all aspects as it is now and give them a new name and skin. How cool will it be.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #23 on: July 03, 2009, 02:16:45 am » |
|
Thats EXACTLY what PE have, PG, with weapon upgrades, that are setup in the launcher as different units. They are all EXACTLY the same.
So again, why does Armor need a new elite infantry unit with assault weapons or AT?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
jackmccrack
|
« Reply #24 on: July 03, 2009, 02:18:05 am » |
|
I do not know the answer to your question.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Schultz
|
« Reply #25 on: July 03, 2009, 02:42:25 am » |
|
Why the hell do you even compaire them to pe. I missed the part where someone seriously said lets copy paste the fuckin same unit. It can be a different unit on each own with different stats and on top of that the ability to fly in the sky, land on a moving Haunebu while casually at peace times serves jack burgers and fries.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #26 on: July 03, 2009, 03:48:12 am » |
|
PE line infantry as luftwaffels : Pzgrens and LGI American line infantry as anything : riflemen. More riflemen. Then more riflemen. You may counte engineers as line infantry, but I don't, just like I don't count pios as line infantry. Give US armor some moar line infantry, vei not? It can replace that T2 that gives the 10 percent less recieved accuracy .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lt_Apollo
|
« Reply #27 on: July 03, 2009, 04:01:09 am » |
|
man AMPM what is your beff with my idea, armour needs a buff we all agree on that, this is a way to give them more diversity plus a uniqe mechanized unit that just with the tank buffs alone is like no other american unit. it can not only purchus a varity of upgrades but also do things normal rifles cant. i dont see your point.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
AmPM
Community Mapper
Posts: 7978
|
« Reply #28 on: July 03, 2009, 04:07:19 am » |
|
But Armor does not need a buff, and certainly does not need some special infantry to go with it.
Hell, with the right doctrines a Sherman Upgun will kill a Panther by itself.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lt_Apollo
|
« Reply #29 on: July 03, 2009, 04:08:40 am » |
|
An idea i just got over ventrillo was to let the mech inf be able to buy flamers, i mean in my opinion this would give the squad more versitility and increase the uniqeness of the unit. i personaly like this idea
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Schultz
|
« Reply #30 on: July 03, 2009, 05:12:33 am » |
|
American line infantry as anything : riflemen. More riflemen. Then more riflemen.
Yeah god forbid theres actually a change/addition in the linear american faction. Question not Relic in her infinite wisdom that theres maybe something wrong with the overall lack of variety in the americans.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Guderian
|
« Reply #31 on: July 03, 2009, 05:20:28 am » |
|
Why do we need another line infantry unit?
The riflemen are versatile.
Besides what unit are you looking for - The botb armored riflesquad?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Eir customer support staff.
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #32 on: July 03, 2009, 05:23:15 am » |
|
Riflemen are versatile in the sence that they die to a variety of enemy units.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Guderian
|
« Reply #33 on: July 03, 2009, 05:39:11 am » |
|
Countered with low cost.
And bars to give the ability to suppress - Grens die quite fast to
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tankspirit666
|
« Reply #34 on: July 03, 2009, 05:41:11 am » |
|
man AMPM what is your beff with my idea, armour needs a buff we all agree on that, this is a way to give them more diversity plus a uniqe mechanized unit that just with the tank buffs alone is like no other american unit. it can not only purchus a varity of upgrades but also do things normal rifles cant. i dont see your point.
Armor need s a buff ? ..... So a Pershing - a Tank better than a Panther , faster than a Tiger is not good enough, even with it`s ridiculously low requirements for vet is not overpowered enough ? The Calliope with itīs devestating effectivenes, it`s high speed and thick armor ( a comparision with Hummel in Mind ) is not overpowered enough ? Tier Abilites which enable you to move and fire with your vehicle while itīs repairing is still not good enough ? If you see it that way you should consider playing more PE if you really want to play sth. that needs some buff.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Guderian
|
« Reply #35 on: July 03, 2009, 05:42:39 am » |
|
Well i thought mechanised would not be about buffing the tanks but more buffing combined arms?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lt_Apollo
|
« Reply #36 on: July 03, 2009, 06:34:05 am » |
|
yes gud that is the point
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #37 on: July 03, 2009, 06:43:21 am » |
|
Tier Abilites which enable you to move and fire with your vehicle Only move, not fire. And that's a t4.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Halfling
|
« Reply #38 on: July 03, 2009, 06:51:24 am » |
|
The Pershing is not more powerful than the Panther. If you take the right doctrine abilities the Panther can be a devastating tank. Can someone explain for me how to add qoutes?
|
|
|
Logged
|
just Halfwhining sometimes
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
Posts: 9028
|
« Reply #39 on: July 03, 2009, 06:59:04 am » |
|
Write your text Select itClick the "talk bubble" logo on the toolbar under "subject" and "message icon"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|