Sach
|
|
« Reply #80 on: July 14, 2009, 10:47:18 am » |
|
No mention of the Schwimwagon bug, or did i miss it?
Its literally game breaking.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sach Wins!  Would people please stop killing my AVREs. Not cool.
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #81 on: July 14, 2009, 10:48:17 am » |
|
It got fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
i prefer to no u
Don't knock it til uve tried it bitchface, this isn't anything like salads version. Besides u said a semois conversion would never work, now look that's the most played map, ohgodwhy.jpg r u map lead
 |
|
|
| Armfelt
|
|
« Reply #82 on: July 14, 2009, 10:54:40 am » |
|
Had fatal error, is it because one team mate had commando sniper in battallion? Or what is it about. Others seem to have had the same problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 "Well opinions are like assholes, everybody has one." |
|
|
Baine
Steven Spielberg
 Posts: 3713
|
|
« Reply #83 on: July 14, 2009, 10:55:36 am » |
|
It's the commando sniper, my company with commando sniper in it had fatal error in every game.
Haven't tried to put it out again though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Armfelt
|
|
« Reply #84 on: July 14, 2009, 10:57:05 am » |
|
Ok thanks for the prompt reply.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Malevolence
Donator
 Posts: 1871
|
|
« Reply #85 on: July 14, 2009, 11:00:07 am » |
|
You'd think they would've tested that |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Akranadas' Greatest Hits, Volume 1: Vet has nothing to do with unit preformance. We are serious about enforcing this, and I am sure you all want to be able to have your balance thought considered by the development team with some biased, sensationalist coming into your thread and ruining it. |
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
 Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #86 on: July 14, 2009, 12:12:02 pm » |
|
75 mm isn't working, and isn't stated as working in the doctrine abilities page.
It is working, but you have to buy a separate churchill for that. You can buy the unupgunned churchill MVK IV and the upgunned churchill MVK VI. I had to sell my vet 2 MVK IV  I did buy the MK VI's, but it still gave me the standard 6 pdr. The sound and apparent splash/effectiveness at least looked like it - I thought it should of replaced it with a 75mm sherman gun? Sound, as well as the effectiveness? It still couldn't beat a P4 by far, and it couldn't hit infantry unless stationary, but it did seem to do damage to the entire squad, rather than just one member, like before.... So I'm not sure if it's working or not, not in the least :S |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Lt_Apollo
|
|
« Reply #87 on: July 14, 2009, 12:42:01 pm » |
|
love bren changes. sadly the bang buses have yet to recive there dose of the nerf stick.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Lemures
|
|
« Reply #88 on: July 14, 2009, 01:07:16 pm » |
|
or IHT?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Lt_Apollo
|
|
« Reply #89 on: July 14, 2009, 01:49:13 pm » |
|
huge diffrance, IHT dies in 3 shots from an atg. a bang bus dies from 7 give or take.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CommanderHolt
|
|
« Reply #90 on: July 14, 2009, 01:53:42 pm » |
|
Right, but that Bren Carrier also only needs a few hits from a Pak to take it down as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
|
« Reply #91 on: July 14, 2009, 01:53:59 pm » |
|
He tried to said that its not affecting IHT, infantry in IHT is not taking damage when IHT is, when your bren is loosing health, inft inside is also, and that's gay.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| acker
|
|
« Reply #92 on: July 14, 2009, 01:54:32 pm » |
|
IHT HP: 300
Bren Carrier HP: 215
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| EliteGren
|
|
« Reply #93 on: July 14, 2009, 02:00:29 pm » |
|
Why should they be identical?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| LuAn
|
|
« Reply #94 on: July 14, 2009, 02:03:26 pm » |
|
He tried to said that its not affecting IHT, infantry in IHT is not taking damage when IHT is, when your bren is loosing health, inft inside is also, and that's gay.
I also dont quite understand why this was implemented? I mean it would have been ok if units in transporters are affected by fire? The units inside tanks(there obviously some) also arent affected by penetration shots e.g.? @Elitegren: I think they shouldnt be but their statistical balance proportions should fit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
aka UckY  |
|
|
Draken
Chess master
EIR Veteran Posts: 1850
|
|
« Reply #95 on: July 14, 2009, 02:04:16 pm » |
|
He tried to said that its not affecting IHT, infantry in IHT is not taking damage when in bren it is, when your bren is loosing health, inft inside is also, and that's gay.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| acker
|
|
« Reply #96 on: July 14, 2009, 02:04:27 pm » |
|
Why should they be identical?
If you were responding to my post...I was responding to LtApollo. huge diffrance, IHT dies in 3 shots from an atg. a bang bus dies from 7 give or take.
If you were responding to Warlight... * Units in open port (bren/IHT) transports will take damage as the carrier is damaged.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Lemures
|
|
« Reply #97 on: July 14, 2009, 02:05:58 pm » |
|
My Kangaroos die in 3 hits....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| acker
|
|
« Reply #98 on: July 14, 2009, 02:08:02 pm » |
|
Forgot to add this in response to Apollo's quote that I embedded in the above post.
IHT HP: 300
Bren Carrier HP: 215
A Kangaroo has 14 more HP than a Cromwell, and uses Cromwell armor.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Lemures
|
|
« Reply #99 on: July 14, 2009, 02:32:11 pm » |
|
I thought they used Sherman stats :S
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
