Rangers XP Requirements

[Guest]

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever

Login with username, password and session length

[Sharpshooter824]

Well I haven't played infantry doctrine for awhile and I come back to find they require even more XP to vet up now? (17/67/133)

This is far to much for a squad of units that do a poor job of killing tanks and a pretty decent job of killing infy (If you pay 140 munitions)

The ranger squad is meant to deal with light vehicles and infantry, not heavy tanks therefore not getting a whole lot of XP in a game unless you are a super pro with them and people are just feeding you XP

I think it would be best if it was reverted to old XP requirements of 13/50/100 (as much XP as a sherman for vet) like it used to be..

discuss and don't you dare flame me this is a logical argument that I want discussed

[Scyn]

Cleared. Please respect Sharp's wishes.

On topic... I was surprised to see the increase in vet requirements at first, but it hasn't been an issue for me. I find that rangers still persevere through everything to get the vet.

[Baine]

The exp requirements are fine as they are, rangers are pretty easy to vet up, especially vs PE. They are allrounders.

[Warlight]

Gaining vet is somewhere betwen survivabuility, and killing power. 

Rangers good in both, you don't need it to be any easier to gain vet.

They have 6 men, with good armor, and you should buy them TSMGs.  If its to expensive, then you buy one group guns, vet them, then move the guns to someone else.

Secondly, they don't need to KILL tanks.  That what ATG's are for, rangers are Finishing blow to fleeing axis tanks.  Or for butraping distracted axis tanks.

And thirdly, if its hard for Rangers to vet, please lower the requirments for all PE infantry, because four man frail squad with average killing power (at most) are infinatly more difficult to vet than rangers.

[Sharpshooter824]

but really, this is one squad, its not like the wtfpwning commandos that own 20 infantry a game, these are just light vehicle killers and support tbh, the XP reqs just seem far to high considering a sherman has less XP requirements and does a better job

[Sharpshooter824]

eh Pgrens also have about the same vet reqs as rifles..

actually if im not mistaken they have less XP reqs

[crimsonrabbit]

sorry about that  
So yeah, rangers just need a little boost in XP requirements to vet up, that's all. I still see elite units like rangers and falls filling the leaderboard so you shouldnt have trouble vetting them up because if they can do it, so can you.
Brought to you by crimsonrabbit.

[Sharpshooter824]

hehe those are also mostly the pros with the units on the leaderboards.. saying something on the leaderboards has alot of XP doesn't mean its inline with other unit's vet requirements..

[Warlight]

Well, you got half the argument, pointing out that rifles and PzGrens need the same vet dosn't mean: its easier to vet up PzGrens than Rangers, or that your argument that rangers ned to be easier to vet is correct.

[Mysthalin]

Honestly, rangers are utterly useless vs anyone who has half a brain on how to counter them. Even my volks spam company finds no trouble countering them 

[Freek]

I lol at rangersin my PE company.  Just stick 2 pzGrens w/ g43's in cover, slow, and watch them die impotently.

[Baine]

Go play PE.

[EliteGren]

You know that slow cuts G43 damage output to about nothing right?

[Mysthalin]

It also buffs their dealt suppresion to about double-tripple.