CommanderHolt
|
|
« Reply #100 on: July 18, 2009, 02:19:44 pm » |
|
Upgun Churchill really only has about a +.1 increase in penetration overall against Armoured units compared to the unupgunned version.
Overall the most important thing about upgun is that it actually does a decent job against infantry.
Edited for clarification
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 18, 2009, 02:56:25 pm by CommanderHolt »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Jazlizard
|
|
« Reply #101 on: July 18, 2009, 02:29:04 pm » |
|
Well that's cause the radius goes from like .5 to 3
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The MOD is over. The war is over. We're too lazy to restart it. You can all go fuck pickles mom, I hear she's easy. |
|
|
gamesguy2
Honoured Member
 Posts: 2238
|
|
« Reply #102 on: July 18, 2009, 02:45:50 pm » |
|
Upgun Churchill really only has about a .1 increase in penetration overall against Armoured units compared to the unupgunned version.
Overall the most important thing about upgun is that it actually does a decent job against infantry.
6pounder has 40% penetration modifier vs P4s, 75mm sherman has 59%. Thats a lot more than just 10%. Its a 50% increase in penetration against the P4. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CommanderHolt
|
|
« Reply #103 on: July 18, 2009, 02:53:29 pm » |
|
I know gamesguy, I didn't say it as a percentage basis, I meant in a +.1 kind of increase.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Illegal_Carrot
Global Moderator
 Posts: 1068
|
|
« Reply #104 on: July 18, 2009, 09:14:46 pm » |
|
I know gamesguy, I didn't say it as a percentage basis, I meant in a +.1 kind of increase.
Err, the difference between 40% and 59% is closer to .2 than it is to .1? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Rifle87654: Give me reward points.
Brn4meplz: I'm drunk. |
|
|
| DarkSoldierX
|
|
« Reply #105 on: July 21, 2009, 09:43:11 pm » |
|
I want a Russian sniper that is equiped with a VSSK(becauz vss aint good enough) to be brainwashed into my army so he may rain silent death upon the enemy infantry. http://world.guns.ru/sniper/sn72-e.htm |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
two words
atgs and fireflies
Looks who's butthurt |
|
|
| pernik
|
|
« Reply #106 on: August 22, 2009, 04:03:55 pm » |
|
I'm wondering, has been the idea of Jumbo scratched or somethin'? Would be great to have tank that can actually stand up against something  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LeoPhone
Honoured Member
Posts: 0
|
|
« Reply #107 on: August 22, 2009, 04:32:20 pm » |
|
like.... the sherman?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| CrazyWR
|
|
« Reply #108 on: August 22, 2009, 06:17:42 pm » |
|
um, no, the sherman fails without armor doc buffs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
1. New tactics? it's like JAWS, first one in the water dies
RCA-land where shells fall like raindrops and the Captain is an invincible god
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
 Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #109 on: August 22, 2009, 06:21:44 pm » |
|
Jumbo fails vs P4's as well, so meh.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want proof!"
"I have proof!"
"Whatever, I'm still right"
Dafuq man, don't ask for proof if you'll refuse it if it's not in your favor, logic fallacy for the bloody win.
|
|
|
| pernik
|
|
« Reply #110 on: August 22, 2009, 06:35:10 pm » |
|
Jumbo fails vs P4's as well, so meh.
Could use more tweaking then?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tymathee
Donator
Posts: 9741
|
|
« Reply #111 on: August 22, 2009, 06:59:19 pm » |
|
Jumbo fails vs P4's as well, so meh.
Could use more tweaking then? Yes. Then again, I dunno what buffs the guy had so i dunno. I tested it one v one vs a p4 w/ skits and lost. Was supposed to get better penetration resist and dmg but i didn't notice. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
