CafeMilani
Aloha
 Posts: 2994
|
|
« on: July 22, 2009, 08:19:03 pm » |
|
i think you should only get 2 new units per reinforcement instead of 4. and no elite units.
e.g. you have a infantry company with 4 rangers. then you pick mando reinforcement package and get 2 mandos on top of that.
ppl do that because units like mandos are just 1337. why buy rifles when u can get mandos?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Illegal_Carrot
Global Moderator
 Posts: 1068
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2009, 08:24:24 pm » |
|
i think you should only get 2 new units per reinforcement instead of 4. and no elite units.
e.g. you have a infantry company with 4 rangers. then you pick mando reinforcement package and get 2 mandos on top of that.
ppl do that because units like mandos are just 1337. why buy rifles when u can get mandos?
Reinforcement packages are being redone to not include any doctrine-specific units, from what I can tell. Once that's done, I don't see getting for normal units as a problem. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Rifle87654: Give me reward points.
Brn4meplz: I'm drunk. |
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 22, 2009, 08:26:43 pm » |
|
do u agree that 4 AB (maybe more with t4) and 2 mandos(+) is just OPed?
or 4 falls or more+ 2 storms? i really hope they delete that shit out of this mod
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 22, 2009, 08:49:20 pm » |
|
yeaa they should limit all elite troops to 2
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Generalleutnant of The Reichs Wolves  Nevergetsputonlistguy767 |
|
|
| pernik
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2009, 09:00:49 pm » |
|
do u agree that 4 AB (maybe more with t4) and 2 mandos(+) is just OPed?
or 4 falls or more+ 2 storms? i really hope they delete that shit out of this mod
2 mandos suck... shitload of resources and nothing really cool - you can get 2 BARs for their price (MU) (4 BARs/2 mandos) and thats way better... im using mando piats instead >:D |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 22, 2009, 09:09:42 pm » |
|
do u agree that 4 AB (maybe more with t4) and 2 mandos(+) is just OPed?
or 4 falls or more+ 2 storms? i really hope they delete that shit out of this mod
2 mandos suck... shitload of resources and nothing really cool - you can get 2 BARs for their price (MU) (4 BARs/2 mandos) and thats way better... im using mando piats instead  soo... if you bought 4 bar squads and i bought 4 mandos, against KCH... who will win faster  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 22, 2009, 09:11:22 pm by Demon767 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| anthony210
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 22, 2009, 09:59:38 pm » |
|
Its Commando's... When people say Mando, I think Mandalorian from Star Wars lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| pernik
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2009, 12:52:58 am » |
|
do u agree that 4 AB (maybe more with t4) and 2 mandos(+) is just OPed?
or 4 falls or more+ 2 storms? i really hope they delete that shit out of this mod
2 mandos suck... shitload of resources and nothing really cool - you can get 2 BARs for their price (MU) (4 BARs/2 mandos) and thats way better... im using mando piats instead soo... if you bought 4 bar squads and i bought 4 mandos, against KCH... who will win faster man, 4 commandos cost 1400 MP and 660 MU... 4 BARs cost 760 MP and 320 MU... what do you think is cheaper? I was just saying "2 Commandos < 4 BARs" not anything about 4 commandos vs 4 BARs - that's disputable, commandos got smoke, but BARs got suppresion + there's huge price difference  all im saying is - 2 commandos are not worth of those resources they do cost... for me (i got 'em in my R-package and ill rather use BARs - even those on Rifles, not on my AB ) |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 23, 2009, 12:55:55 am by pernik »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mysthalin
Tired King of Stats
 Posts: 9028
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2009, 02:36:53 am » |
|
soo... if you bought 4 bar squads and i bought 4 mandos, against KCH... who will win faster The smart player's sherman will win that engagement. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Talas
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2009, 04:22:05 am » |
|
Don't use mandos as main-force, easy. In my company I had one (!) squad of ranger and I didn't care much about them just used them to flank. Got like 400xp in notime.
Riflemen and Tommies should take the beating and lock-up the enemy for the rangers/mandos to party!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
You could realistically replace all the infantry with different colored gummy bears and the tanks with My Little Ponies and have the same game.
I would like to see that MOD!  |
|
|
| cobol
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2009, 04:51:32 am » |
|
it is really strange that there are actually everywhere a lot of elite infantry is jumping around. elite infantry is ok, but it should be fixed to a few squads and not that anyone can field a whole ranger/mando company with reinforcement package.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 23, 2009, 04:53:51 am by cobol »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Talas
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2009, 07:10:09 am » |
|
If same applies to axis storms and KCH that is. I want to see more volks, grens and rifles!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| cobol
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 23, 2009, 07:22:42 am » |
|
That is what i mean Talas. Not only allies elite infantry , i mean axis elite infantry too. Take out this oversupply for elite infantry and take them out of reinforcement packages. They should be elite not massed on the battlefield.
Atm its really too much of of axis and allies elite inf i think.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CafeMilani
Aloha
Posts: 2994
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 23, 2009, 07:26:31 am » |
|
That is what i mean Talas. Not only allies elite infantry , i mean axis elite infantry too. Take out this oversupply for elite infantry and take them out of reinforcement packages. They should be elite not massed on the battlefield.
Atm its really too much of of axis and allies elite inf i think.
thats it. another good example is unknownz AB company |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #14 on: July 23, 2009, 07:29:15 am » |
|
Yea maximum of 2 elite squads per company, thats it, end of discussion, no buts no iffs, ONLY 2!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| DarkSoldier
|
|
« Reply #15 on: July 23, 2009, 07:48:41 am » |
|
Yes buts and ifs lol, 2 KCH squads are a total of 6-8 people. 2 ranger squads is 12 people >.< keep it even. I would like for there too be a larger limit on elites and yes I also want to see more basic infantry.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #16 on: July 23, 2009, 07:59:42 am » |
|
huh i dont get what you mean
if you mean the squad sizes, they are even in terms of how much dps they duel out and what they are used for.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| Talas
|
|
« Reply #17 on: July 23, 2009, 08:04:51 am » |
|
A sqd of kch and a sqd are pretty equal, although with their differences. kch gets beaten upp in close range by rangers but u have to have greater perspective. That is that wehr is generally better the more distance they got to the enemy, hence don't fight on rangers terms.
Oaksleaves and swords or whatever its called should maybe grant more sqds to make those companys more special.
IMO I would like to see what company people got in the launcher, at the time being only the ones that play regulary remember who play what and then you won't upset if u, for exemple misses one guys sherman more often (due to doc.) etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
| cobol
|
|
« Reply #18 on: July 23, 2009, 08:19:36 am » |
|
Tha squadsize is not the problem i think. Like talas said, each elite infantry has its special, tahts why they are elite, they are special in some kind of warfare. bBut its annoying to see ppl call in a massive amount of ranger/mandos/falls/storms.
I.E. i played once 2 Inf Players, they got like 10 Ranger squads on the field at the same time, that i think shouldnt be.
And you dont have too care much about them, i mean everyone gots lot of elite infantry if you are high lvled.
They just should be limited, its WW2 not some kind of covert ops behind enemy lines. :p
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Demon767
Warmap Betatester
EIR Veteran Posts: 6190
|
|
« Reply #19 on: July 23, 2009, 08:22:57 am » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
